![]() |
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 965249)
No, thank you I don't text. I think that we need to verify compliance at least on a monthly basis... We are after all trusting the alpa guys and management to ensure that these super secret agreements are being adhered to, a yearly report is nowhere near enough.
|
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 965233)
We have two guys monitoring Domestic and International Code Share Compliance for the MEC. One has been there a while and the other one is a very smart and capable 2001 hire who I have a ton of respect for. Simply put, I trust em to do their jobs.
So, which one of them DISCOVERED the increased gross weight issue? |
Originally Posted by Sink r8
(Post 965253)
Let's say ACL is right, and we have two guys that get the text messages continuously, because they're younger than you, and they have the technology... In that case, whenever there is a MEC meeting, it could be standard practice for the reps to come back and give us confirmation we're in compliance. That would be plenty. I don't need a full report at monthly intervals.
|
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 965240)
Hey ER guys and gals;
Notice the new airports that we have pictorial SAQ for? TYG |
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 965237)
Now you are seeing things. I just answered a question, and I am sorry to report, as much as it would suit you, I have no agenda expect to see us unify under ALPA. Why? Because long term it is in our best interests. No more, no less.
Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
(Post 965049)
Having the structure in place isn't enough. It has to be used effectively to be of any value. You aren't going to get the kind of unity you're looking for with weak leadership and a lack of any real, compelling objective. DAL management went for the throat and tried to destroy our careers during BK. And now that the BK/emergency has been over for several years, they refuse to even lift a finger to try and make it right. Even worse, DALPA refuses to so much as ASK them to make it right. Unity will fall into place nicely when it is clear that we can rally around the objective of correcting this. But it ain't gonna happen with Lee Moak type leaders and with people like yourself, who rationalize every excuse they can find not to fight for it.
|
Originally Posted by Sink r8
(Post 965253)
Let's say ACL is right, and we have two guys that get the text messages contiuously, because they're younger than you, and they have the technolgy... In that case, whenever there is a MEC meeting, it could be standard practice for the reps to come back and give us confirmation we're in compliance. That would be plenty. I don't need a full report at monthly intervals.
|
Originally Posted by scambo1
(Post 965254)
So, which one of them DISCOVERED the increased gross weight issue?
The Chairman. They were working the issue when a few of us brought pictures to them. No kidding.. |
Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
(Post 965264)
I agree that unity is a very important part of the equation (although definitely not the only part). But that brings me right back to the point I was making in my post that prompted the 'if you're so smart, why don't you run for office' question:
DAL88, and that is why I see all of these issues as personnel issues and not a ALPA structure issue. The overall structure of ALPA is just fine, and for those items that need changing, there is a mechanism in place. |
Originally Posted by TenYearsGone
(Post 965261)
HHHMMMMMMMM...Interesting..Borat would be pleased.
TYG |
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 965271)
To say the least. Lots of horse meat served in those parts.
They are divert fields.. nothing to see here except that one is listed.. (I think)... as a recurring charter flight... |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:23 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands