Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

tomgoodman 08-04-2011 09:59 AM

Beware the Curse!
 

Originally Posted by slowplay (Post 1033718)
We're not going down the "hiding money" path again, are we?:rolleyes:

Ah, that path! According to Delta lore, it led from the G.O. to a vacant lot near the cargo ramp. Hooded figures would creep along it at midnight once per quarter, carrying pickaxes, shovels, and a heavy footlocker. Many have set out to find the path, but none have returned. BwaaHaaHaa! :eek:

N9373M 08-04-2011 10:04 AM


Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy (Post 1033488)
Not to be a one upper. Slow speed rejected takeoff in ATL in a MD88. After MEL procedures, were restricted to FLAPS 5. We were now overweight for 26L and 28 though we were sitting in between 26L and 26R at the time. So we taxied over to 27R. Our Vspeeds ... 163, 168, 175. And of course a HW5 required. Giddy up!

what speed are the tires rated for?

80ktsClamp 08-04-2011 10:10 AM


Originally Posted by N9373M (Post 1033971)
what speed are the tires rated for?

The ones on the 737-800 are 220... and that airplane is a runway hog for sure. Typical approach speed is in the mid 150's. Rotation is usually near 160.

We did a heavy takeoff out of MEX a few weeks ago and our takeoff roll was over 10,000 feet!

cni187 08-04-2011 10:18 AM

Could oil actually close under $90 a barrel? Whoa!

cni187 08-04-2011 10:19 AM


Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp (Post 1033975)
The ones on the 737-800 are 220... and that airplane is a runway hog for sure. Typical approach speed is in the mid 150's. Rotation is usually near 160.

We did a heavy takeoff out of MEX a few weeks ago and our takeoff roll was over 10,000 feet!

Is this why the 73 has surpassed the 88 this year in the number of unstabilized visual approaches? Just did recurrent and the instr said the Mad Dog is no longer the sloppy messy kid in the cafeteria

Rather B Fishin 08-04-2011 10:24 AM


Originally Posted by cni187 (Post 1033979)
Is this why the 73 has surpassed the 88 this year in the number of unstabilized visual approaches? Just did recurrent and the instr said the Mad Dog is no longer the sloppy messy kid in the cafeteria

We're #1, we're #1!!!!!!!!!!!

80ktsClamp 08-04-2011 10:29 AM


Originally Posted by cni187 (Post 1033979)
Is this why the 73 has surpassed the 88 this year in the number of unstabilized visual approaches? Just did recurrent and the instr said the Mad Dog is no longer the sloppy messy kid in the cafeteria

I really don't get it.. the 73N is very easy to slow down compared to the 757. I typically come down final at idle and flaps 5 or flaps 10...at about 1500 feet go gear down and straight to flaps 30. The thing slows down like a brick.


Oh, and the age old excuse of "cannot fart with confidence" will no longer work with crew scheduling:

http://failblog.files.wordpress.com/...oduct-fail.jpg

buzzpat 08-04-2011 10:35 AM


Originally Posted by cni187 (Post 1033979)
Is this why the 73 has surpassed the 88 this year in the number of unstabilized visual approaches? Just did recurrent and the instr said the Mad Dog is no longer the sloppy messy kid in the cafeteria

Its us by a long shot. Not really sure why. I agree with 80, the jet slows down just fine.

Check Essential 08-04-2011 10:38 AM


Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp (Post 1033975)
The ones on the 737-800 are 220... and that airplane is a runway hog for sure. Typical approach speed is in the mid 150's. Rotation is usually near 160.

We did a heavy takeoff out of MEX a few weeks ago and our takeoff roll was over 10,000 feet!

Riddle me this??? Did you use reduced thrust?

It is for this exact reason that I have somewhat changed my philosophy on the use of assumed temperature and derated thrust on the 737-800. I think the AWABS people have been overdoing it a bit lately. There's no reason we have to be using the whole runway on every takeoff. This whole balanced field thing is OK but there are some airports I'd prefer to get up and out of there or have a little more cushion if we ever do have to abort at high speed.
I used to automatically use the top line. No longer. Now I give a closer look to the RATOW and climb limits.

Did a takeoff out of ATL the other day with a double de-rate and geez...
Southwest taxis with more thrust than we had.
Used up the whole 27R and we weren't even that heavy.

PastV1 08-04-2011 10:56 AM


Originally Posted by hitimefurl (Post 1033925)
I'd say UPS does win but FedEX has an unlimited amount of feeder aircraft allowed. The Mountain Air Cargo types have no cap unless I'm reading challenged today. LUV has no regional planes but they are selling flights to Mexico by using Volaris via some kind of "connecting" arrangement. I don't know the details but I assume SWAPA signed off on this?

Here's our scope: FDX (There is more that deals with some relief)


The Company’s revenue flights (including Company revenue charter flights), conducted with aircraft owned, leased, or operated within the domestic or international operations described below, conducted with aircraft over 60,000 lbs. MTOGW, shall be flown only by pilots whose names appear on the Federal Express Master Seniority List in accordance with the terms of the Agreement.


There are some exceptions such as Morningstar that does our intra-Canadian flying in FDX owned 757's. Also some charter relief for Peak etc.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:48 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands