Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-21-2011, 11:02 AM
  #76051  
Works Every Weekend
 
Check Essential's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: 737 ATL
Posts: 3,506
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
Let me put it this way, pay or jobs?
I say bring on the new hires.

Last edited by acl65pilot; 09-24-2011 at 09:10 AM.
Check Essential is offline  
Old 09-21-2011, 11:05 AM
  #76052  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,534
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
Okay, let's play a game?

1. Pay or scope?

yes

2. If scope, what pay?

SWA pay and scope is a reasonable absolute floor. Any scope less than that equates to extreme pay premiums over and above SWA

3. If pay, or when it comes to pay, what work rules?
This is where we consult the "pilot surveys" keeping in mind that in no case will anything be less than SWA for domestic and we must keep our current 3/4 pilot metrics even if the FTDT regs gut them to try and pay for regional safety improvements.

Last edited by gloopy; 09-21-2011 at 11:25 AM.
gloopy is offline  
Old 09-21-2011, 11:06 AM
  #76053  
At home on the maddog!
 
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: ATL MD-88A
Posts: 2,874
Default

Originally Posted by shiznit
(Bold mine)

I would LOVE to be able to suspend the principles of logic and prove a negative, but that is not possible in the world we live in, sorry.
I'm not asking you to "suspend the principles of logic." I'm just asking you to provide evidence... any evidence... that the predominant view on this MEC is that restoration should be our objective. That's what you keep saying it is, right? Well you must have something to make you think that! Is it something your reps said or wrote to you? If so, what? What did they say that would indicate the predominant view on this MEC (not just your rep's view) is a focus on restoration?

See, I think you can tell a lot about a person's intentions by listening to what they say and looking at what they do. When we emerged from bankruptcy and the "emergency" was over, I started paying a lot of attention to what DALPA was saying and doing. I expected to see an unmistakable focus on restoring what was taken/we lost/we gave up (however you see it) just before and during bankruptcy. I expected to see that our MEC clearly understood that the cuts we took were NOT a permanent reset of how our profession is compensated. What I saw instead was... well.... basically NOTHING. And I interpret that (don't know how else you could interpret it) as a tacit admission that our massive concessions were indeed a permanent reset. And in the 4+ years since, I've seen nothing to indicate otherwise. Again, if you have something, I'd sure love to see it!

Originally Posted by shiznit
Everytime you(or anyone for that matter) posts inaccurate information on what the MEC is trying to do for the pilots, you are attempting to MANAGE EXPECTATIONS. Cut it out! I don't want other posters and the many more lurkers out there to lower their personal bar for the next contract because of your attempts to paint a bleak picture of the leadership!
That's some pretty convoluted logic. If anything, I'm trying to RAISE expectations! We get plenty of LOWERED managed expectations from DALPA. But mostly, I'm trying to get you (and others) to look realistically at this MEC and see what you think their intentions really are. Look. I know you have a high level of trust in ALPA. But sometimes, blind trust can really bite you in the @ss. All I'm asking you to do is to look at what this MEC says and does. Look at it with an open mind. And then tell me what you see. Tell me exactly what you see that would indicate they are working towards restoration. Maybe it's just right in front of me and I'm missing it. Help me out here, Shiz!!!
DAL 88 Driver is offline  
Old 09-21-2011, 11:13 AM
  #76054  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,534
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
Okay, let's play a game?

1. Pay or scope?

2. If scope, what pay?

3. If pay, or when it comes to pay, what work rules?
Originally Posted by newKnow
Let's see. How about, I'M SAFE(R)?

I - International Flying: Why are our code share partners ordering widebody aircraft while we tout an order for 737-900's to replace some of our 757's and 767's? All this while the new United has 100 747-400's and 777's. Delta has 34. We continue to add foreign carriers while we pull down international in most regions.

M - Money: When a Southwest 737 taxi's by, can we honestly say we make enough money? insert joke about SWA taxi speed here

S - Scope: Do we have tight and enforced scope language? (See next two below) should we grant further scope relief just to help the company get fake debt relief while trusting the same lawyers who were outsmarted by the ancient seperate certificate trick at Republic Air Group of getting it right this time?

A - Alaska Airlines: Why are they expanding 5-6% (while we are shrinking)? and in a "supposedly" no revenue sharing agreement no less. Srsly?

F - Frontier Airlines: Why are they touting themselves as the fastest growing major airline (while we are shrinking)? And subsidizing them while we do it!

E (R) - Enriched Retirement: What can we do to get a better retirement plan? Because, like Scambo said, "Without a pension, an airline job is just a job. Pension being the differentiator for me between a career and a job." That just happened!

OMG you're my new best friend call me every 5 minutes!!!!!

I added a little bit in bold, but otherwise you just Chuck Norris'd that into next week!
gloopy is offline  
Old 09-21-2011, 11:24 AM
  #76055  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,534
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid

I say jobs.

Say Delta is fine with status quo, but if you sign off on a b scale they'll order e190s and let's say that was 100% accurate verifie by DALPA, DPA, Embraer, the BOD, ESPN and Carl Spackler. B scale and E190s, no b scale and status quo. Which of those two would you pick?

Let me put it this way, pay or jobs?
I see what you are getting at here, but for the E190 (or equivalent) JB pay scales are the absolute floor in C12K. OK that means contract 12,000 as someone pointed out, but C12 just sounds lame without the K Anyway if we can't profitably operate them here at non union cost slasher ultra low JB rates (as an absolute negotating room floor) then we shouldn't have them. Not to mention the E190 isn't a 100 seater unless you run it all coach, which we wouldn't. We don't even like all coach CRJ-700's anymore. So the E190 is more of a 90 seater anyway.

Sidebar: even the 717, which we call a 117 seater, would seat more in all coach. OTOH they used to be 80 seaters at MidWest airlines.

Anyway: I think where you meant to go with this was that if it came down to status quo on today's outsourcing of the 76 and under seat range, could we rationalize a B scale to get that back, if it was the only way to do so?

Yes. B scales suck, but they suck less than outsourcing. That does not mean you are "advocating" a B scale. It merely means you are willing to accept it to get the work back if that was the only way to get it back.
gloopy is offline  
Old 09-21-2011, 11:32 AM
  #76056  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Space Shuttle PIC
Posts: 2,007
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
this is where we consult the "pilot surveys" keeping in mind that in no case will anything be less than SWA for domestic and we must keep our current 3/4 pilot metrics even if the FTDT regs gut them to try and pay for regional safety improvements.
I agree here. Instead of apparent shooting LOW to hit already managed expectations, let's go after all areas of the SWA contract, and negotiate from there, above it. SWA doesn't have as many scope problems, so we would have to branch off there and focus on specific scope wants and needs. The survey hasn't been completed yet, but some reps already give expectations in the form of head shakes and winces. That has to stop.
Bill Lumberg is offline  
Old 09-21-2011, 11:52 AM
  #76057  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,234
Default

So I heard ALPA has a new proposal from SWA and is going to let the pilots vote on this one. The kicker?!? it is WORSE than the first proposal. Nice job again ALPA
PilotFrog is offline  
Old 09-21-2011, 12:05 PM
  #76058  
*********
 
paxhauler85's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,068
Default

Originally Posted by PilotFrog
So I heard ALPA has a new proposal from SWA and is going to let the pilots vote on this one. The kicker?!? it is WORSE than the first proposal. Nice job again ALPA
Did you expect anything less? I'm a card carrying member and volunteer, but I'm aware enough to realize that the union is nearly worthless, and will ALWAYS disappoint.

This isn't an attack on you, but more me adding my "Atta' boy ALPA, knew you would disappoint, again."

The real victims here are the AT guys, who will never get the settlement they deserve, thanks largely in part to ALPA.
paxhauler85 is offline  
Old 09-21-2011, 12:13 PM
  #76059  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Space Shuttle PIC
Posts: 2,007
Default

Originally Posted by PilotFrog
So I heard ALPA has a new proposal from SWA and is going to let the pilots vote on this one. The kicker?!? it is WORSE than the first proposal. Nice job again ALPA
Then vote NO and take it to arbitration. Is that not an option?
Bill Lumberg is offline  
Old 09-21-2011, 12:18 PM
  #76060  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TenYearsGone's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: 7ERB
Posts: 2,039
Default

Overheard 777 CA (senior, bidding 9 or so<--Dont quote me on the seniority) brag on his beautiful schedule and pay. He also was explaining to my friend that his life was excellent and that his compensation was very good. He looked over 60 but what do I know. I just cringed and decided we needed more Carls at the top of the list.

I have a feeling there are some old timers that do not want to disrupt their final years. Truly Sad because these old timers where the first ones to congratulate the outgoing age 60 retirees.

TEN
TenYearsGone is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices