![]() |
Originally Posted by iceman49
(Post 624329)
The relationship should not be warm and fuzzy, but rather a professional relationship...where we both need each other.
|
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 624345)
1. Acted like a union and not sold everyone's unity and job protection as "bargaining credits" to offset concessions to a few members retirement and pay packages (and I'm not just talking about D-ALPA). A union's top priority must be unity. Outsourcing is absolute poison to the association.
When resolutions calling for study at the LEC level are responded to at the MEC level with votes of acclimation crushing the action requested by members, what are members to do? The next step is very destructive and truthfully, as an ALPA supporter, I'll blink 10 out of 10 times before stabbing my Rep in the back, or trying to undermine my bargaining agent. The representational relationship has to be based on mutual support to work effectively. So, if our association mows over us, does it benefit us to go nuts and set up USAPA Chapter 2? The best we can do is continue to support our association and hope that it finds a representational and moral compass to update its position from. 2. Wrote and got resolutions passed, did committee work, walked a few hundred miles in circles carrying signs, made presentations to my LEC and MEC, wrote the association's President. Exhausted all internal remedies and stopped short of suing the union. Slowplay - The truth is, his union does legally speak for him, but has forgot it has a representational duty to consider his input and act accordingly. Basically your question challenges those of us who want reform to seek relief through external mechanisms like decertification, or litigation. Before you corner people with that question, first think about whether the answer is going to be your desired outcome. Your very question is the issue that got the hot heads on the phone to Mike Haber. Carl |
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 624352)
You are correct.
Carl |
Originally Posted by bigdaddie
(Post 624353)
Agreed. But the company loves Maok. What do we make of that?
Those stairs are a pain, come over to the dark side. |
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 624343)
The funny thing is that during the BK negotiations there was a proposal out there that had us keeping the Pension. Neither side wanted to hear it, so they removed that author of that proposal from the room.
It still miffs me that AIG has effectively ran their company into bankruptcy four times now and still everyone has their very generous pension plans. Most of the Execs left the Company for better jobs elsewhere when the ship sank, yet they keep their rights to benefits. |
Originally Posted by iceman49
(Post 624368)
BD...that in itself should be worrisome to the membership, he works for the membership, not the other way around.
Those stairs are a pain, come over to the dark side. Did that make any sense? |
Completely.
BB.. NWA paid a very high price to keep what they preserved and now, unfortunately, you and I get that bill despite being two airlines removed from where that deal took place. What was the high price you were talking about? Thx. |
BigDaddie - Lets give Moak credit where credit is due:
Where he differs from the "unionists" is that he thinks like a senior manager, a hedge fund analyst and a Marine. When it comes to scope he thinks tactically instead of strategically. He does not see ALPA as a union. He sees many divisions within ALPA, not all of them friends and not all deserving of the same representation. Not that I've spent a lot of time with our Chairman, but I do really appreciate 95+% of what he has done to make this airline a better place to work. I have no doubt is heart and head are in the right place. |
Originally Posted by iceman49
(Post 624373)
Completely.
What was the high price you were talking about? Thx. |
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 624343)
The funny thing is that during the BK negotiations there was a proposal out there that had us keeping the Pension. Neither side wanted to hear it, so they removed that author of that proposal from the room.
btw, how does this help us look forward?:mad: |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:03 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands