Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
From: SLC ERB
Yes, but there are published hold downs on the STAR's and we all know that the AIM is well, guidance. I have been cleared to 350 out of there and queried about the hold down, and they emphatically stated they wanted us to follow the published altitudes on the STAR.
SLC is the airport he flew out of and for that reason, I stated what I did. We have seen a bunch of issues with just that out of SLC. That is why out of there, I always ask.
SLC is the airport he flew out of and for that reason, I stated what I did. We have seen a bunch of issues with just that out of SLC. That is why out of there, I always ask.
They even give an example-
EXAMPLE-
1. A departure flight receives a clearance to destination airport to maintain FL 290. The clearance incorporates a DP which has certain altitude crossing restrictions. Shortly after takeoff, the flight receives a new clearance changing the maintaining FL from 290 to 250. If the altitude restrictions are still applicable, the controller restates them.
Seriously, If they want you to obey the hold downs, then they need to specifically restate them when they issue you a new altitude clearance.
Again, if you're not sure, ask - but this is standard ATC stuff so it's no wonder that the controllers might be a bit put off by pilots always asking them for clarification.
At the beginning of the month we're all 0 and it's seniority based. No problem with that. If a pilot wants to go up 15 or down 15, have at it.
But this is the deal, I think for those sitting 50% or below which is the full or partial weekend crowd, they'll fly the same as they do now. I think for those sitting 50% on reserve who are the bottom or plugs of the weekends off crowd, they'll double their work and that may extend right up to the 25 percentile doubling their work.
Somewhere in the single digits they'll fly 0.
But it's all where the threshold is set as to how much is skewed from the middle to top to pay the very top. That's my angst. On ATL88B, I think 80 points is way too high.
It honors seniority as it needs to. I will be getting a lot more SC"s and many more of the less desirable trips, but that is the way seniority works. The current system abrogates the entire seniority system. The current system works well if you game it, but the new system will allow seniority to play a significant part as it did pre CH11. I suspect it will go more senior, but not as senior as it did prior to CH11.
Also, FtB, given that the M88 block hrs are going to be going up by about 20% over the next few months, reaching a 80 on your raw will happen with two four day trips. Prior to this fall it took no time to get to 80 and I was generally timed out by the end of the second week. As more move in to 2013 and beyond, we will not see the over staffing that we do now. Just remember how much we generally were used prior to this latest pull down.
I might actually have to go bid a line somewhere because we know that the 14 hr SC limit on International Categories will be the last thing implemented as part of the FT/DT
Of course, YMMV
Also, FtB, given that the M88 block hrs are going to be going up by about 20% over the next few months, reaching a 80 on your raw will happen with two four day trips. Prior to this fall it took no time to get to 80 and I was generally timed out by the end of the second week. As more move in to 2013 and beyond, we will not see the over staffing that we do now. Just remember how much we generally were used prior to this latest pull down.
I might actually have to go bid a line somewhere because we know that the 14 hr SC limit on International Categories will be the last thing implemented as part of the FT/DT

Of course, YMMV
What I see is if you could hold weekends off (50%-ish on reserve) you basically had the same QOL as the top 3% but you just flew earlier in the month. Now top 5% get the month off the remaining top 45% will work a lot more. Give or take %s. I'd rather have more getting more than substantially less getting it all - and it makes no appreciable difference then what they have now.
Hence, lower the bucket thresholds.
Or else....
underboob becomes undertestes.
Southwest Drive-By Posting -
For the sake of all, let's not speak of under-testes again.

For the sake of all, let's not speak of under-testes again.

Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
From: One with wings
You called my bluff.
That brings to mind this LJ:
it's not the most graphic, it just ends the best in this new TOS world.
BTW, I think I saw a picture of 80's wife holding a machine gun. 80?
it's not the most graphic, it just ends the best in this new TOS world.
BTW, I think I saw a picture of 80's wife holding a machine gun. 80?
Last edited by johnso29; 01-20-2012 at 03:36 AM.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
From: A-320/A
Note to self: Next time, only load one chamber.
I like raw score. I like the fairness it presents because I think it provides a large % of the group with a high QOL whereas a seniority based system provides a much smaller % with nearly the same high QOL they'd gotten anyways.
At the beginning of the month we're all 0 and it's seniority based. No problem with that. If a pilot wants to go up 15 or down 15, have at it.....
At the beginning of the month we're all 0 and it's seniority based. No problem with that. If a pilot wants to go up 15 or down 15, have at it.....
FtB,
I'm gonna wait to see how it all plays out, and I admit I had to skim all of you guys analysis on what you think is gonna happen with the new reserve changes. But, if your goal is to stay at home, I think you should be ok.
Here's how I look at it. The company and union saw a lot of people complaining about being forced to commute to reserve. These changes probably address those concerns by not allowing a difference of 1 point in RAW score to be the cause of someone who doesn't want to fly to have to fly when there is someone out there who want's to fly. Make sense? (I know, probably not.
) Ok. Maybe an example is better. Let's say you are a reserve pilot who lives in base and you want to stay at home. You've got a raw score of 0, but there is a guy who has to commute to reserve who has vacation at the end of the month, so he has a RAW score of 16. Both of you start your reserve days on the 1st, and a trip comes up for the second. (Of course, he's in base because he had to sit SC his first day.) He want's to get out of there because he burning up hotel expenses, or his crash pad buds are in town and they don't take baths, or something. Under the old system, even though he wants the trip to escape the funk, he can't get it, and he's stuck and unhappy, while you get the the trip that takes you away from home.
I'm thinking the buckets and increased seniority honoring provisions will even themselves out and allow people to fly when they want to based on seniority. If I'm on reserve and someone gets a trip I wanted because he's more senior to me, at least I know he wanted it and it's not a situation where he has to go fly and I have to sit in a hotel room just because of a point or two.
I think the changes assume that there are a certain percentage of people in every category on reserve who want to fly. For the people who want to stay at home, they should be able to do so, up to a point.
Well, that's how I see it.
New K
I'll concur, something is happening with reserve... category with 90ish people in it, last line holder went 9 lower than last month, and quite a few senior guys bid reserve in Feb. Can't think why, as nothing to stay home for but SBowl, and that can't be a bigger pull than Xmas and Thanksgiving. Let me bid 7 places higher than I did last month for PBS. I was surprised.
FtB,
I'm gonna wait to see how it all plays out, and I admit I had to skim all of you guys analysis on what you think is gonna happen with the new reserve changes. But, if your goal is to stay at home, I think you should be ok.
Here's how I look at it. The company and union saw a lot of people complaining about being forced to commute to reserve. These changes probably address those concerns by not allowing a difference of 1 point in RAW score to be the cause of someone who doesn't want to fly to have to fly when there is someone out there who want's to fly. Make sense? (I know, probably not.
)
Ok. Maybe an example is better. Let's say you are a reserve pilot who lives in base and you want to stay at home. You've got a raw score of 0, but there is a guy who has to commute to reserve who has vacation at the end of the month, so he has a RAW score of 16. Both of you start your reserve days on the 1st, and a trip comes up for the second. (Of course, he's in base because he had to sit SC his first day.) He want's to get out of there because he burning up hotel expenses, or his crash pad buds are in town and they don't take baths, or something. Under the old system, even though he wants the trip to escape the funk, he can't get it, and he's stuck and unhappy, while you get the the trip that takes you away from home.
I'm thinking the buckets and increased seniority honoring provisions will even themselves out and allow people to fly when they want to based on seniority. If I'm on reserve and someone gets a trip I wanted because he's more senior to me, at least I know he wanted it and it's not a situation where he has to go fly and I have to sit in a hotel room just because of a point or two.
I think the changes assume that there are a certain percentage of people in every category on reserve who want to fly. For the people who want to stay at home, they should be able to do so, up to a point.
Well, that's how I see it.
New K
I'm gonna wait to see how it all plays out, and I admit I had to skim all of you guys analysis on what you think is gonna happen with the new reserve changes. But, if your goal is to stay at home, I think you should be ok.
Here's how I look at it. The company and union saw a lot of people complaining about being forced to commute to reserve. These changes probably address those concerns by not allowing a difference of 1 point in RAW score to be the cause of someone who doesn't want to fly to have to fly when there is someone out there who want's to fly. Make sense? (I know, probably not.
) Ok. Maybe an example is better. Let's say you are a reserve pilot who lives in base and you want to stay at home. You've got a raw score of 0, but there is a guy who has to commute to reserve who has vacation at the end of the month, so he has a RAW score of 16. Both of you start your reserve days on the 1st, and a trip comes up for the second. (Of course, he's in base because he had to sit SC his first day.) He want's to get out of there because he burning up hotel expenses, or his crash pad buds are in town and they don't take baths, or something. Under the old system, even though he wants the trip to escape the funk, he can't get it, and he's stuck and unhappy, while you get the the trip that takes you away from home.
I'm thinking the buckets and increased seniority honoring provisions will even themselves out and allow people to fly when they want to based on seniority. If I'm on reserve and someone gets a trip I wanted because he's more senior to me, at least I know he wanted it and it's not a situation where he has to go fly and I have to sit in a hotel room just because of a point or two.
I think the changes assume that there are a certain percentage of people in every category on reserve who want to fly. For the people who want to stay at home, they should be able to do so, up to a point.
Well, that's how I see it.
New K
Yes, but there are published hold downs on the STAR's and we all know that the AIM is well, guidance. I have been cleared to 350 out of there and queried about the hold down, and they emphatically stated they wanted us to follow the published altitudes on the STAR.
SLC is the airport he flew out of and for that reason, I stated what I did. We have seen a bunch of issues with just that out of SLC. That is why out of there, I always ask.
SLC is the airport he flew out of and for that reason, I stated what I did. We have seen a bunch of issues with just that out of SLC. That is why out of there, I always ask.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




