![]() |
Originally Posted by PinnacleFO
(Post 1120715)
Pinnacles crj 200 contract with Delta includes 141 200's that expire in 2017. The 900 contract is for 57 900's that go to 2023. 16 of those airplanes are owned by pinnacle and we expect them to be sold back to delta soon so that they can 2 for 1 them with "another DCI carrier" to park 32 more 200's. Our q400's are not making money for continental nor are our saabs so if those rates are not changed those planes are gone too.
Leads me to the following question, if those things happen we are left with 141 200s and 41 900s all flying for delta, could that be a good opportunity at that point for Delta to repurchase a bankrupt regional carrier and basically absorb them over time through a flow type situation as they park 200's in an attempt to eliminate a regional carrier and bring more flying back into mainline? Its not me saying hey just buy us so that i get a mainline job, its more saying, if delta wants to park 200's, here is 141 of them right here and with the upcoming retirements as pilots retire, you retire 200's as well and bring those pilots onto a bigger plane (on probation for a year since they didnt have to interview) It would also make sense if they wanted to bring on the c series because that plane will pay less anyways. Ok i just woke up, but what if......... Absorbing PCL would trigger a couple of things. First of all they would have to pay DAL rates for those A/C to the current PCL pilots (who would become DAL pilots) which they won't want to do. DAL rates for 10yr CRJ-900 CA - $114/hr 10yr FO - $78/hr. Your current CRJ-900 10yr rates (according to this site) are $88/$45 respectively. Secondly, I realize they have done flow through in the past with Compass but that was a remnant from Northwest. With a flow through DAL loses control over who they interview/hire. I'm not saying anything negative about either pilot group I just think the DAL hiring folks like to have that control. I wish we could fold in all the RJ flying to mainline, it would be better in the long run for all of us but you have to follow the money since that's what this business is all about. It's cheaper to operate the aircraft at a separate carrier at lower wage rates. What will be key in the coming years is where the next order of 100 seat jets is placed. JetBlue and USAir have set a nice precedent having that size aircraft operated at a mainline carrier and I know most guys I fly with and talk to agree we have to protect/tighen scope first and foremost. Without an aircraft to fly there is no job and all the other aspects of our contract are irrelevant. Best of luck to you.:) |
Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg
(Post 1120767)
Rumor alert. Just had a DL jumpseater tell me he recently had a linecheck and the checkairman said he just went to some big linecheck meeting in Mecca and a VERY high up guy stated we were looking to maybe buy back the DFW hanger and maybe get some gates back. Aren't we getting some MD90s this year?
|
I miss Tebow.
There's just something about how an underdog can inspire the unexceptional. :D |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1120781)
I miss Tebow.
There's just something about how an underdog can inspire the unexceptional. |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1120749)
Bingo!
fwiw, on ATL88B 43 out of 49 pilots available tomorrow or 5 days or less have a raw score < 80. If you take into account that each pilot sits 2 SCs by now, then even by adding 10 points to each pilot you have 40 out of 49 with raw scores below 80. Meanwhile today a weekend, 0 pilots. 2 pilots are on the list but they're probably flying. Daily coverage shows 5 out of 8 trips today were GS. Like Orvil said, no. No "selling of vacations", it's one of those provisions DALPA has in the PWA to protect ourselves from... ourselves. |
Originally Posted by iaflyer
(Post 1120783)
Isn't that what we have the Maddog pilots for? Inspire Boeing and Airbus folks? ;)
|
Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
(Post 1120789)
Stop pointing that out to people. We have a good thing going here in ATL88B on reserve. I don't want to jinx it.
Just trying to keep the buckets fair. |
A C-5 fly over is pretty cool.
|
Originally Posted by JetFlyer06
(Post 1120774)
Absorbing PCL would trigger a couple of things. First of all they would have to pay DAL rates for those A/C to the current PCL pilots (who would become DAL pilots) which they won't want to do. DAL rates for 10yr CRJ-900 CA - $114/hr 10yr FO - $78/hr. Your current CRJ-900 10yr rates (according to this site) are $88/$45 respectively.
Secondly, I realize they have done flow through in the past with Compass but that was a remnant from Northwest. With a flow through DAL loses control over who they interview/hire. I'm not saying anything negative about either pilot group I just think the DAL hiring folks like to have that control. I wish we could fold in all the RJ flying to mainline, it would be better in the long run for all of us but you have to follow the money since that's what this business is all about. It's cheaper to operate the aircraft at a separate carrier at lower wage rates. What will be key in the coming years is where the next order of 100 seat jets is placed. JetBlue and USAir have set a nice precedent having that size aircraft operated at a mainline carrier and I know most guys I fly with and talk to agree we have to protect/tighen scope first and foremost. Without an aircraft to fly there is no job and all the other aspects of our contract are irrelevant. Best of luck to you.:) |
Originally Posted by PinnacleFO
(Post 1120802)
At the end of our contract in 2015 our CRJ 900/200 rates are 115 and 108 respectively for year 15 and 99/90 for year 10. What they could do which I am sure about 90% of pinnacle would be happy with is lock in our current rates until the end of the collective bargaining agreement 2015, at which time new rates negotiated with DALPA or DPA would take affect. It seems like a perfect opportunity to take back flying thats why i am bringing it up. I know what you are saying about DAL controlling the hiring and understand, however when the numbers start to creep up to over 500 pilots a year you cant be that selective.
Even if management were to entertain the concept we would have to show we could operate the aircraft and be competitive with other airlines. We have tried on two different occasions to show that on aircraft under 70 seats and sadly we could not even make the numbers remotely close. Managements numbers showed a even bigger gap. You also have to question if Pinnicle management would want their airline to cease to exist along with their jobs. The last problem is seniority integration. Pilots will say almost anything to get on a mainline list or to move their list to a solvent carrier when they are bankrupt but when the dust settles and they have arrived all that is forgotten. The lawsuits soon follow. Anything that goes against the spirit of the new federal law would have a chance in court. I suspect SW has not heard the end of their integration. Once the airtran pilots are on the SW side of the fence watch how fast the lawsuits start flying. In that case I think they have a real chance unlike most situations in the past. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:43 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands