Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

scambo1 03-25-2012 04:57 PM


Originally Posted by Scoop (Post 1157911)
Scambo,

I am for that as long as we incorporate this into our hiring selection process:

Right Stuff - selection testing clip - YouTube

Scoop :)

I'm with you, I just can't figure out what Gordo saw in Nurse Murch. She had a pretty burly 'stache. Coulda been an ALPA nurse.

acl65pilot 03-25-2012 05:14 PM


Originally Posted by newKnow (Post 1157908)
If "they" don't already know who the major players are on here, I'd be very surprised.

I am sure they do., or least assume the know who most are.

newKnow 03-25-2012 05:15 PM


Originally Posted by buzzpat (Post 1157806)
Actually, Johnso, IMHO, bringing smaller jets to the company and getting giddy is shortsighted. Do we want to become a regional carrier or do we want to play on the big playground? I understand where you guys are coming from. You are a product of the regionals. Yes, let us absolutely recapture our scope. But, no, let us not get comfortable with settling for that. Again, growing small is not growing big. We should shoot for growing big.

Buzz,

I think the problem with your argument is you assume a recapture of small jet flying necessarily comes at the expense of growing large jets.

I don't think having Delta pilots fly 70 seaters will cost us too many 777 orders. But, on the other hand, when we lobby for approval of slot swaps in LGA, and the company put's 70 seaters on the majority of the routes, we don't scream so much.

If you're worried about the pay, you should probably see by now, it's easier to control pay in negotiations, than it is to reel in scope. I'm willing to bet those 70 seaters have cost mainline pilots way more money than any cut we've ever taken in our pay-rates.

Finally, I think the main advantage of recapturing that smaller flying is we avoid the potential whip-saw between pilot groups whenever a new route is opened. Plus, it's some serious furlough protection.

Personally, I'd take every 70 seater we could get.

contrails 03-25-2012 05:16 PM

2005

http://cdn-www.airliners.net/aviatio.../7/0794705.jpg



Originally Posted by buzzpat (Post 1157806)
Actually, Johnso, IMHO, bringing smaller jets to the company and getting giddy is shortsighted. Do we want to become a regional carrier or do we want to play on the big playground?

2010

http://cdn-www.airliners.net/aviatio.../1/1716102.jpg

acl65pilot 03-25-2012 05:17 PM


Originally Posted by buzzpat (Post 1157827)
No Sink, I'm not kidding. And, once again, I get it. What I am saying is that bringing smaller jets to the company is fine. It certainly behooves the junior guys. I'm not opposed to it, I actually applaud it. HOWEVER, if anybody thinks that it means we are thriving is sorely mistaken. We are a huge international airline. We pride ourselves on being the best pilots in the industry. And, in my opinion, we are. The company can't grow and WE can't grow if we don't aspire to build our WB fleet. I saw an Aeroflot 777 take off from LA last night on its way to Moscow. Do you know how many 777s we have? Frikkin Aeroflot? Which we now code share by the way. We are quickly becoming a ticket brokering regional carrier. Not what I have in mind.

You have a very important point. We need to fix CS's and JV's in a big way. Anyone of those in the Pacific market with our current language and the deal not being a profit sharing venture and all growth is capped.

Scope is not just small jet but all jet flying Dal engage in. It all matters.

newKnow 03-25-2012 05:20 PM


Originally Posted by acl65pilot (Post 1157921)
I am sure they do., or least assume the know who most are.

We probably provide a lot of entertainment for them. :D

forgot to bid 03-25-2012 05:30 PM


Originally Posted by newKnow (Post 1157908)
If "they" don't already know who the major players are on here, I'd be very surprised.

OH ####


Originally Posted by newKnow (Post 1157927)
We probably provide a lot of entertainment for them. :D

Whew.

Wilbur Wright 03-25-2012 05:33 PM


Originally Posted by buzzpat (Post 1157806)
Actually, Johnso, IMHO, bringing smaller jets to the company and getting giddy is shortsighted. Do we want to become a regional carrier or do we want to play on the big playground? I understand where you guys are coming from. You are a product of the regionals. Yes, let us absolutely recapture our scope. But, no, let us not get comfortable with settling for that. Again, growing small is not growing big. We should shoot for growing big.

Include me with the peeps who disagree with you Buzz. Even though those seats are well below my seniority and I would prefer 86 more 747/777s, any new iron on the property is good iron.

Bucking Bar 03-25-2012 05:35 PM


Originally Posted by Superpilot92 (Post 1157907)
I'd venture to say that expressjet and Asa had the highest numbers of new hires with NWA/DAL than any other groups fwiw.

Obviously, because they are the best of the best.

Originally Posted by scambo1 (Post 1157274)
Rumor alert!

The wierdest: ASA (expressjet) pilots being told by their Flt Ops chief that they will be "stapled" to the bottom of the DAL list. Apparently ASA (expressjet's) interview process is conducted by DAL now, including 73N sim time at DAL.


For some reason a tired Trojan Horse with "one list" or "brand scope" emblazoned across it flying a "unity" flag gets trotted out right about now. Usually it is a distraction for a scope sale, going back to MidAtlantic, the "anyone but a NWA subsidiary" scope concession, Compass, and even recently revived via back room chatter during Moak's secret 76 seat grievance settlement (although no one correlated it then ... Moak can keep a secret). Supporting rumors of high pilot attrition, the need for stability and potential staffing shortages fill the logical cracks.

I don't know why this Trojan Horse is pushed across the field whenever scope officially isn't in play. My guess is that mainline fears interference with more outsourcing and uses the distraction to negotiate in the clear. After all, the bulk of our outsourcing goes to union breaking carriers and the folks most likely harmed (or at least diluted) are fellow union members.

Of course, my hope is always is that there is some seriousness to the rumors, but when accompanied by false statements like "the Company decides the list." When this rumor is accompanied by a Single Carrier Petition with the NMB, then I'll take notice.

Bucking Bar 03-25-2012 05:46 PM


Originally Posted by contrails (Post 1157923)



What changed?

Two votes to allow more outsourcing, a grievance settlement and a decline in ALPA membership.

Here's to hoping that reverses course.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:06 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands