![]() |
Originally Posted by Sink r8
(Post 1184224)
Three posts back... isn't that technically overboob? Or do you call it undershirt? I appreciate any illustrated answer(s).
I think we should examine this more closely. Regards, Sink r8. I think you could almost call that one; Stealth Boob! :eek: |
Originally Posted by orvil
(Post 1184229)
Wow, I think it's a trifecta. Over, under and dare I say it aero.....nip...naw, can't do it, but you get the idea.
|
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1184158)
So let ME get this straight. You come to an "anonymous" web forum for information to help form YOUR thinking...
I come here mostly to hang out with fellow breast enthusiasts. |
Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
(Post 1184214)
I know that I have changed some minds. Guys have told me that. But I realize I will never change your mind as it is already made up.
DAL 88 Driver, I don't agree with some of what you say, and I don't agree with the suggestion the other union would get the job done, but I think your motivations are to better our circumstances, and that's good. I only see one problem with what you post, and it's not related not a lack of reasoning or consistency. You have zero apparent interest in any viewpoint that doesn't fully conform to yours. You're very clever at using a person's post, but only for the purpose of crafting another version of your own argument. You know how to dissect, and you know how to read; you just refuse to actual consider. It's like having a religious "discussion" with a born-again christian. You might think you're discussing something with them, but when you think back on it, you realize that you were just on the receiving end of an attempt to convert. Nothing you ever say could possibly matter, or change their outlook. Makes you a great master-debater, but a lousy person to have a conversation with. It's a little like trying to arguing LBP with TSquare, when he's in that mood. |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1184237)
If that were the state of florida, all but Miami is visible. :)
|
Originally Posted by orvil
(Post 1184173)
Elvis,
Your apology is accepted. Your punishment is to go over to ACL's house and help spread mulch:) I am 2/3rds of the way though 13 cu yds. Yes, doing it all by myself. |
Originally Posted by orvil
(Post 1184173)
Elvis,
Your apology is accepted. Your punishment is to go over to ACL's house and help spread mulch:) I am 2/3rds of the way though 13 cu yds. Yes, doing it all by myself. |
Originally Posted by Sink r8
(Post 1184224)
Three posts back... isn't that technically overboob? Or do you call it undershirt? I appreciate any illustrated answer(s).
I think we should examine this more closely. Regards, Sink r8.
Originally Posted by orvil
(Post 1184229)
Wow, I think it's a trifecta. Over, under and dare I say it aero.....nip...naw, can't do it, but you get the idea.
Originally Posted by Timbo
(Post 1184231)
I think you could almost call that one;
Stealth Boob! :eek: Sorry Timbo, but your wrong on this one. The accepted terminology here is Omni-Boob. |
Originally Posted by Sink r8
(Post 1184240)
Fascinating comment.
DAL 88 Driver, I don't agree with some of what you say, and I don't agree with the suggestion the other union would get the job done, but I think your motivations are to better our circumstances, and that's good. I only see one problem with what you post, and it's not related not a lack of reasoning or consistency. You have zero apparent interest in any viewpoint that doesn't fully conform to yours. You're very clever at using a person's post, but only for the purpose of crafting another version of your own argument. You know how to dissect, and you know how to read; you just refuse to actual consider. It's like having a religious "discussion" with a born-again christian. You might think you're discussing something with them, but when you think back on it, you realize that you were just on the receiving end of an attempt to convert. Nothing you ever say could possibly matter, or change their outlook. Makes you a great master-debater, but a lousy person to have a conversation with. It's a little like trying to arguing LBP with TSquare, when he's in that mood. The only place I disagree with your post is when you say that I do not consider other viewpoints. I do listen, and I do critically think about what's being said. If I see something that merits a change in my thinking, I adjust accordingly. If you'll remember, I have compromised on the idea that we should expect to get C2K+COLA all in one bite. I would accept SWA+ as a minimum level of compensation for this contract. I think that's reasonable. And part of the way I got there was some of the other opinions I have read here. |
Originally Posted by Check Essential
(Post 1184238)
Nah. Any information I manage to absorb is secondary.
I come here mostly to hang out with fellow breast enthusiasts. Have a wonderful day. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:05 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands