Delta Hiring News
#9581
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
Agree. If say hypothetically we paid cash for the 321s and the 88s were on lease, would we be parking the 321s? In one post SF says that marketing (which I'm sure he means network) decides what and where we fly but here he contradicts himself and it's all of a sudden what we have lease payments on? Doesn't make any sense. The 88s are being parked because they are maintenance intensive gas guzzling junk, not because they happen to be paid for.
As to the start of this discussion airlines rarely park aircraft they have ongoing leases or mortgages. They will try and get out of leases however that tends to be difficult when capacity is declining. The only other options is a chapter 11 filing. They are more than willing to park aircraft with low or no monthly costs.
Last edited by sailingfun; 07-11-2018 at 08:12 AM.
#9582
#9584
If they don’t hire in the fall they will need to restructure aircraft deliveries or park airframes and tell marketing they can’t fly the business plan. 250 displacements is not the big deal some are claiming. A much smaller training department handled massive displacements and retirements in the early 2000 era. Hiring will be driven by the block hour plan for next summer not by training.
Far more important will be the price of jet fuel in determing hiring. Jet fuel will directly drive marketing’s block hour plan.
Far more important will be the price of jet fuel in determing hiring. Jet fuel will directly drive marketing’s block hour plan.
As for personal insults, I disagree. You stated that you're just repeating what management has said, that is the very definition of a mouthpiece. If you don't like the accurate characterization then change the behavior that earned it.
#9585
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
[QUOTE=Han Solo;2632423]No, you just choose to pick and choose what you respond to. First you claim the block hour program is driven by marketing and that jet fuel prices drive marketing.
But now apparently a leased plane vs. a paid for plane is what's important in the decision on which planes to park and which to fly.
Can you tell me how these two statements contradict each other? One deals with why a airline might want to slow growth or reduce capacity and the other with how they would do it.
As far as managements mouthpiece I am simply stating what they publically put out. In fact at one of the road shows they had a PowerPoint slide saying “MD88, the accumulator fleet”. I suspect you were not around when they used it that way.
As far as the start of this discussion Delta can make more rapid capacity changes the UAL or American. When you decrease capacity you incur a rise in cost per seat mile. Delta can do it for a lower increase by virtue of our fleet makeup.
But now apparently a leased plane vs. a paid for plane is what's important in the decision on which planes to park and which to fly.
Can you tell me how these two statements contradict each other? One deals with why a airline might want to slow growth or reduce capacity and the other with how they would do it.
As far as managements mouthpiece I am simply stating what they publically put out. In fact at one of the road shows they had a PowerPoint slide saying “MD88, the accumulator fleet”. I suspect you were not around when they used it that way.
As far as the start of this discussion Delta can make more rapid capacity changes the UAL or American. When you decrease capacity you incur a rise in cost per seat mile. Delta can do it for a lower increase by virtue of our fleet makeup.
#9586
No, I definitely see that as advantageous. What I don't understand is why it is not MORE advantageous than is reflected in enterprise value. Institutional investors, while mostly having a herd mentality are not stupid. DAL trades in a $5 channel.. has for months. If, as you say, the fleet makeup is advantageous, and we can draw down gas guzzlers easily whereas UAL and AAL are running up debt with new airplanes, why is that not reflected in value? Your argument makes no sense when comparing legacy airlines. We have (something like)$4B in debt. AAL has close to $30B and a highly leveraged fleet. Oil is going up and Wall Street doesn't see the difference. Makes zero sense.
#9587
[QUOTE=sailingfun;2632430]
Please fix the quote
No, you just choose to pick and choose what you respond to. First you claim the block hour program is driven by marketing and that jet fuel prices drive marketing.
But now apparently a leased plane vs. a paid for plane is what's important in the decision on which planes to park and which to fly.
Can you tell me how these two statements contradict each other? One deals with why a airline might want to slow growth or reduce capacity and the other with how they would do it.
As far as managements mouthpiece I am simply stating what they publically put out. In fact at one of the road shows they had a PowerPoint slide saying “MD88, the accumulator fleet”. I suspect you were not around when they used it that way.
As far as the start of this discussion Delta can make more rapid capacity changes the UAL or American. When you decrease capacity you incur a rise in cost per seat mile. Delta can do it for a lower increase by virtue of our fleet makeup.
But now apparently a leased plane vs. a paid for plane is what's important in the decision on which planes to park and which to fly.
Can you tell me how these two statements contradict each other? One deals with why a airline might want to slow growth or reduce capacity and the other with how they would do it.
As far as managements mouthpiece I am simply stating what they publically put out. In fact at one of the road shows they had a PowerPoint slide saying “MD88, the accumulator fleet”. I suspect you were not around when they used it that way.
As far as the start of this discussion Delta can make more rapid capacity changes the UAL or American. When you decrease capacity you incur a rise in cost per seat mile. Delta can do it for a lower increase by virtue of our fleet makeup.
#9588
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
No, I definitely see that as advantageous. What I don't understand is why it is not MORE advantageous than is reflected in enterprise value. Institutional investors, while mostly having a herd mentality are not stupid. DAL trades in a $5 channel.. has for months. If, as you say, the fleet makeup is advantageous, and we can draw down gas guzzlers easily whereas UAL and AAL are running up debt with new airplanes, why is that not reflected in value? Your argument makes no sense when comparing legacy airlines. We have (something like)$4B in debt. AAL has close to $30B and a highly leveraged fleet. Oil is going up and Wall Street doesn't see the difference. Makes zero sense.
UAL market value: 19.0 billion
Delta market value: 34.5 billion.
Seems like wall street thinks there is a difference.
#9589
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2018
Posts: 2,987
Han Solo is right. You fly whatever aircraft you can make the most money on. If I had two houses for rent, one paid off that earned 3000 a month cash flow and another with a mortgage that earned 2000 a month cash flow, and I can only have one tenant, am I going to let the paid off house sit empty or the mortgaged house?
The reason md88s will be parked is because of higher operating costs due to fuel/mx, not because of how the debt is structured.
The reason md88s will be parked is because of higher operating costs due to fuel/mx, not because of how the debt is structured.
#9590
Market cap does beg the question though as to what determines the 'world's largest airline'.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post