|
Originally Posted by GivemeVSP
(Post 1895907)
So what's on chit chat? I too tried to sign up about a month ago, and nothing...
The general consensus is these numbers are ridiculous, with some saying wait and see what they tell us officially. There are some who seem willing to defend it w/o coming out and saying it, but that could just be my take from scanning too quickly. |
what i heard while checking in this afternoon
7/3/3/3 2 more dc but taken from profit sharing loss of 40 hours of sick verification at 80 per year no more oe bumps no change to vacation or cq pay no per diem increase aint no way this piece of crap can possibly be our next cba. definitely no |
Originally Posted by GunshipGuy
(Post 1895917)
Someone quoted a rumor they said they got from APC (9/6/1/1 partially funded with PS cuts and concessions). The latest rumor over there is 8/6/3/3 (8/.25/3/3 if you consider the PS funding to pay for it); scope change regarding 76 seater, change to FO LCA OE trips, and sick leave change to mention the big stuff.
The general consensus is these numbers are ridiculous, with some saying wait and see what they tell us officially. There are some who seem willing to defend it w/o coming out and saying it, but that could just be my take from scanning too quickly. |
Originally Posted by pilotjockey
(Post 1895925)
what i heard while checking in this afternoon
7/3/3/3 2 more dc but taken from profit sharing loss of 40 hours of sick verification at 80 per year no more oe bumps no change to vacation or cq pay no per diem increase aint no way this piece of crap can possibly be our next cba. definitely no |
And just like that, the pathetically inadequate JV grievance settlement is buried. An afterthought.
RA played Donatelli like a fiddle. Donatelli is playing us like a Stradivarius. "World's best airline contract." |
Originally Posted by GunshipGuy
(Post 1895917)
Someone quoted a rumor they said they got from APC (9/6/1/1 partially funded with PS cuts and concessions). The latest rumor over there is 8/6/3/3 (8/.25/3/3 if you consider the PS funding to pay for it); scope change regarding 76 seater, change to FO LCA OE trips, and sick leave change to mention the big stuff.
The general consensus is these numbers are ridiculous, with some saying wait and see what they tell us officially. There are some who seem willing to defend it w/o coming out and saying it, but that could just be my take from scanning too quickly. |
Originally Posted by Rowdy320
(Post 1895893)
And the same 5 alpa-holics are right there to defend to the end. Its a 2 way street on the boards so your attempt to portray chitchat as a pro-dpa board is totally on sided.
Every single thread gets hijacked by the same people. I think the moderator is trying to manage an impossible situation, and vindicating the Delta MEC's unanimous decision to shut down their version of Hangar Talk. I never claimed, nor do I believe, that the current moderator of chitchat is supportive of DPA. It's more like a 5-2 furball. And it's high school. The wackaloons over there would get banned in a week from APC. |
We are always shocked at how small the raises are. Alpa will explain time value of money and tell us how this is the best offer we are going to get. There will be yelling in the crew rooms just like last time. It will pass just like it always does. It's the same thing everytime. I'm a no vote as always.
|
Apparently this is what the LA reps meant when they referred to a "punch in the face."
It's pretty clear that when RA demanded an audience with the MEC, he told them they could either accept the scraps he offered now, or he would string out the process as long as he could. And that's your sales pitch: TVMv2.0 I'm happy to string this mofo out. |
Originally Posted by gloopy
(Post 1895631)
Sort of. Its a blended figure that includes raises as well as the monetization of concessions elsewhere rolled into the over all "raise".
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:17 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands