Search

Notices

Details on Delta TA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-15-2015 | 03:26 PM
  #9051  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by MtEverest
Has anybody heard from Council 1 or 20? Will they provide a proper pro/con paper in the tradition of ALPA that was once trusted with facts?
Haven't spoken to either councils about this, but I can tell you that there was serious discussion during C2012 at the MEC administration level of putting Council 20 (DTW) under receivership via Article 8 of the ALPA constitution. That would have meant the elected leadership removed and ALPA national running the council. That's how angry that MEC administration was at council 20 for producing con papers and dissenting views. That could very well be happening again. If so, I hope those councils speak up anyway.

Carl
Reply
Old 06-15-2015 | 03:32 PM
  #9052  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
I think it was slowplay that thought it. Funny though.

Carl
OK, get those two S's confused.
Reply
Old 06-15-2015 | 03:40 PM
  #9053  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Haven't spoken to either councils about this, but I can tell you that there was serious discussion during C2012 at the MEC administration level of putting Council 20 (DTW) under receivership via Article 8 of the ALPA constitution. That would have meant the elected leadership removed and ALPA national running the council. That's how angry that MEC administration was at council 20 for producing con papers and dissenting views. That could very well be happening again. If so, I hope those councils speak up anyway.

Carl
That's really sad if that happened and is happening. It just further indicts this current MEC as being dishonest. If what they are selling is accurate, it can stand up to a proper pro/con. I used to be a strong supporter of our union. The way they are acting now is outrageous and more like a dictatorship than a union representing the people.
Reply
Old 06-15-2015 | 03:41 PM
  #9054  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,184
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Trip7
And we'll be back to the table in 2018, 2 years before AA's CURRENT deal expires
I'm not sure that is much of a selling point frankly. It means we will, once again, be pattern bargaining off of ourselves. I don't expect any help from SWA. FDX is a darkhorse, and UAL is um. Yeah.
Reply
Old 06-15-2015 | 03:50 PM
  #9055  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Instructordude
I am a yes but what happens when the company cant afford these 20% raises? Now what?
Easy, we help our company if there is true need. We've always done that. The mistake we made was not demanding snap-back provisions in bankruptcy. Our unions did not even ask for that because it was ALPA national's position that snap-back clauses word harm the airline if they became profitable again. Not kidding. Can you imagine the angst this would saved this pilot group once the industry got a hand on how to be profitable?

Originally Posted by Instructordude
Profit sharing wont matter cause will headed towards BK.
That's what makes profit sharing so important. During bad times, the company doesn't pay it. During good times, we don't have to negotiate for it.

Originally Posted by Instructordude
I actually like the sick call procedures, keeps people honest,
I'm honest too, but I've had some bad health luck in my career. During that bad luck, I've never had to turn over my privacy rights. Now I will...if I want to be paid that is.

Originally Posted by Instructordude
and dont mind the LCA. Why should anybody be payed to sit at home. Pretty sure nobody gets paid to sit on their a$$ at HQ's.
As others have said, HQ jobs aren't comparable. Pretty sure HQ guys don't work weekends, holidays and miss much of their children's growing up.

Originally Posted by Instructordude
I am proudly voting yes but with reservations.
OK.

Carl
Reply
Old 06-15-2015 | 03:53 PM
  #9056  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Convenient that you omitted the first part of my post.
That's because I didn't think that part of your post was total BS. The rest was.

Carl
Reply
Old 06-15-2015 | 03:56 PM
  #9057  
Purple Drank's Avatar
Straight QOL, homie
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,202
Likes: 1
From: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Default

Originally Posted by Instructordude
. I actually like the sick call procedures, keeps people honest, and dont mind the LCA. Why should anybody be payed to sit at home. Pretty sure nobody gets paid to sit on their a$$ at HQ's. I am proudly voting yes but with reservations.
Reply
Old 06-15-2015 | 03:57 PM
  #9058  
Purple Drank's Avatar
Straight QOL, homie
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,202
Likes: 1
From: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Default

Originally Posted by ERflyer

Like I said, I am currently undecided on this one however.

First, the money.
Money is not "first" for everyone.
Reply
Old 06-15-2015 | 03:57 PM
  #9059  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by SayAlt
Carl should be recruited to replace Donutbelly. Unfortunately, Carl is too smart and honest to ever take the job.
Appreciate the kind words, I just think we have much smarter people here that would do a great job. But first we'd have to get rid of the antiquated process of electing an MEC chairman. It should be a vote of the full membership.

Carl
Reply
Old 06-15-2015 | 03:59 PM
  #9060  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

Originally Posted by Instructordude
I am a yes but what happens when the company cant afford these 20% raises? Now what? Profit sharing wont matter cause will headed towards BK. I actually like the sick call procedures, keeps people honest, and dont mind the LCA. Why should anybody be payed to sit at home. Pretty sure nobody gets paid to sit on their a$$ at HQ's. I am proudly voting yes but with reservations.
You do realize that the LCA thing cuts into those raises as your earning potential will be less due to less GS and WS due to increased rsvs? If you're right seat, that will directly affect the trip quality you can hold as well.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kilroy
ExpressJet
10796
01-11-2016 06:49 AM
FastDEW
Major
201
09-03-2011 06:42 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
ksatflyer
Hangar Talk
10
08-20-2008 09:14 PM
INAV8OR
Mergers and Acquisitions
66
05-15-2008 04:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices