Details on Delta TA
#9051
Carl
#9053
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: CA
Haven't spoken to either councils about this, but I can tell you that there was serious discussion during C2012 at the MEC administration level of putting Council 20 (DTW) under receivership via Article 8 of the ALPA constitution. That would have meant the elected leadership removed and ALPA national running the council. That's how angry that MEC administration was at council 20 for producing con papers and dissenting views. That could very well be happening again. If so, I hope those councils speak up anyway.
Carl
Carl
#9054
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,184
Likes: 0
I'm not sure that is much of a selling point frankly. It means we will, once again, be pattern bargaining off of ourselves. I don't expect any help from SWA. FDX is a darkhorse, and UAL is um. Yeah.
#9055
That's what makes profit sharing so important. During bad times, the company doesn't pay it. During good times, we don't have to negotiate for it.
I'm honest too, but I've had some bad health luck in my career. During that bad luck, I've never had to turn over my privacy rights. Now I will...if I want to be paid that is.
OK.
Carl
#9057
Straight QOL, homie
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,202
Likes: 1
From: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
#9059
Carl
#9060
I am a yes but what happens when the company cant afford these 20% raises? Now what? Profit sharing wont matter cause will headed towards BK. I actually like the sick call procedures, keeps people honest, and dont mind the LCA. Why should anybody be payed to sit at home. Pretty sure nobody gets paid to sit on their a$$ at HQ's. I am proudly voting yes but with reservations.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




