Search
Notices

Details on Delta TA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-16-2015, 09:22 AM
  #9221  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by Professor View Post
I am not being paid.
Yes, you are. Can't imagine what you hope to gain by lying about it:

Originally Posted by Professor View Post
I will give you a current account of my FPL.
21 hours.
For the new folks here, FPL is Flight Pay Loss.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Old 06-16-2015, 09:22 AM
  #9222  
Super Moderator
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DAL 330
Posts: 6,881
Default

Originally Posted by Professor View Post
I think that everyone comes into a TA with their entire life's history. It informs their viewpoint on the TA and its validity in the scope of their airline experience.

The question everyone has to ask, I think, is this: are the pay increases worth the concessions? And only you can answer that.

IF this TA passes in 2018 Delta pilot pay will have increased 82% in a decade. So while the past may inform everyone's decision it is important to keep in mind the reality of our contract improvements (and give backs) of the last decade are NOT normal to the history of the industry.

So you wonder why guys are critical? You conveniently pick the time frame (decade) that makes your point but does not tell the full story.

How about we go to back to 2004?

If you want to gain some credibility how about the whole truth? Or do you have to stick with the DALPA talking points?

Scoop
Scoop is offline  
Old 06-16-2015, 09:23 AM
  #9223  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,184
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler View Post
Yes, you are. Can't imagine what you hope to gain by lying about it:



Carl
Prove it then, and I will agree with your side. Other than that it is more of your patented union busting tactics.
BenderRodriguez is offline  
Old 06-16-2015, 09:23 AM
  #9224  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 618
Default

Originally Posted by TheManager View Post
Of course it does.





You posted this:





AA has just published new comparison pay charts for their pilots.



In case you do not trust DALPA's pay analysis.



Attached Images

AA comparison paycharts.pdf (71.7 KB, 9 views)











Helping people to understand the TA would have been something like this- first, strike out your editorial comment:



"In case you do not trust DALPA's pay analysis."









Then post something like this:







Here are some recently released charts by AMR and the APA that compare our TA pay to their pay. Our pay exceeds theirs in many areas, but pay attention to the differences on both sides of the scale as details are important. A330 pay is not on an apples to apples comparison due to the difference in bands.



Those are facts. That would have been truly "helping people understand a TA that has lots of changes (that) isn't all that easy to decipher"



So, what did you say again about confirmation and information bias???




I don't agree. My point was to show that we are trying and put out third party info. Separate and apart from delta.

You are extrapolating a lot from a benign post about numbers. That is rhetorical and biased.

Not once have I ever disagreed with your point on 330 rates. Ever.

But if I were to mention anything positive in those charts, like 190 rates being by far this highest in the industry, you would have labeled me a sycophant.

I do understand your points though and will incorporate it into my communications. Thanks.
Professor is offline  
Old 06-16-2015, 09:23 AM
  #9225  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TheManager's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,503
Default

Originally Posted by BenderRodriguez View Post
You mean "facts" like these?:
Of course.

Are you refuting that a fast negotiation, where the company controlled the pace, did not work to our advantage?
TheManager is offline  
Old 06-16-2015, 09:24 AM
  #9226  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,184
Default

Originally Posted by TheManager View Post
Of course.

Are you refuting that a fast negotiation, where the company controlled the pace, did not work to our advantage?
Your parable is not remotely a "fact". You are seriously trying to defend it as such?
BenderRodriguez is offline  
Old 06-16-2015, 09:25 AM
  #9227  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sounds's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2014
Posts: 168
Default

Originally Posted by SayAlt View Post
I have now put "Professor" on ignore. I'd like to invite the rest of you to join me.

Edit: I have included BenderRodriguez as well. I hope you will join me.
.
.
Visual representation of your tips:
Sounds is offline  
Old 06-16-2015, 09:26 AM
  #9228  
Super Moderator
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DAL 330
Posts: 6,881
Default

Originally Posted by BobZ
bender....this pilot group has a history of the company not having to 'take' anything from us.....

we simply give it away....because dalpa tells us if we don't something even worse will happen....

sound familiar?





Originally Posted by BenderRodriguez View Post
Care to discuss the issue or are you just going to interject hyperbole?

Are you serious? Hyperbole?

So you don't remember the Pilot group taking a voluntary 32% pay cut to avoid BK? Remember do it once do it right?

Oh by the way, how did they honor our voluntary sacrifice - thats right they used the BK tool on us anyway taking another 14% via the 1113 process.

Scoop
Scoop is offline  
Old 06-16-2015, 09:26 AM
  #9229  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Posts: 329
Default

I've read thru most of this TA. For me it feels like a give back TA, it's almost like we were bargaining with an airline just barely making it. Our raises are coming from our PS give back. Our sick verification process for an aging pilot group that may in the near future go to 68. There should of been no give back period in this TA, PERIOD!
MOTOJOE is offline  
Old 06-16-2015, 09:26 AM
  #9230  
Gets Weekends Off
 
qball's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: Cockpit speaker volume knob set to eleven.
Posts: 1,410
Default

Originally Posted by BenderRodriguez View Post
I agree also, but is it really that important? It doesn't change how I am reading the TA, and how I will decide. Does it affect you in that way? It's minutiae, and really not worth getting spun up over imho.
True, but it calls in to question whether our MEC is an honest broker of information "the facts".
qball is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kilroy
ExpressJet
10671
01-11-2016 06:49 AM
FastDEW
Major
201
09-03-2011 06:42 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
ksatflyer
Hangar Talk
10
08-20-2008 09:14 PM
INAV8OR
Mergers and Acquisitions
66
05-15-2008 04:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices