Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > Endeavor Air
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Endeavor? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Endeavor?

Notices
Endeavor Air Regional Airline

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Endeavor?

Old 10-22-2017, 10:09 AM
  #16781  
Gets Weekends Off
 
prex8390's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,145
Default

Originally Posted by PotatoChip View Post
Oh. That's different. Sucks, but different. It would have taken an LOA for them to dual qualify line captains.
If you got any questions about this place shoot me a dm, going off your posts i can see youre pretty unhappy over at commutair
prex8390 is offline  
Old 10-22-2017, 10:16 AM
  #16782  
Layover Master
 
Joined APC: Jan 2013
Position: Seated
Posts: 4,310
Default

Originally Posted by prex8390 View Post
If you got any questions about this place shoot me a dm, going off your posts i can see youre pretty unhappy over at commutair
You ain't lying.
PotatoChip is offline  
Old 10-22-2017, 10:16 AM
  #16783  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2017
Posts: 527
Default

Originally Posted by HighFlight View Post
Well, new company procedure says not to call gatekeeper in ATL any longer. We are to go with what the in range tells us now.
Well, not exactly. It's really unclear what they meant in the memo. It says not to call for a gate assignment, but does that mean not to call for gate confirmation for what you got over ACARS? Also, it clearly says not to call Special Assist about anything routine, but that doesn't mean Gatekeeper.
vessbot is offline  
Old 10-22-2017, 10:29 AM
  #16784  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2016
Posts: 2,559
Default

The release is clearer... do not call gatekeeper, just go to the gate you received during in-range call. (Paraphrasing here, but it’s on the release)

I’ve only seen once where we got to the gate and it was occupied, but I’m not sure if that was before the new system was in place or after. So from now on, no more gatekeeper calls. If we get to a gate and it’s full, I’ll call ops and let them handle it.

Originally Posted by vessbot View Post
Well, not exactly. It's really unclear what they meant in the memo. It says not to call for a gate assignment, but does that mean not to call for gate confirmation for what you got over ACARS? Also, it clearly says not to call Special Assist about anything routine, but that doesn't mean Gatekeeper.
HighFlight is offline  
Old 10-22-2017, 10:49 AM
  #16785  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Posts: 503
Default

Originally Posted by PotatoChip View Post
Are rsv captains dual-Qualified to fly both seats? Do they get called for trips in either seat?

Thanks.
No. And the Union better not LOA this BS either
Slaveaway is offline  
Old 10-22-2017, 02:28 PM
  #16786  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Feb 2017
Posts: 68
Default

So for most people, this TA results in a paycut, but I dont understand why everyone is saying we have to credit 83 hours a month to break even. With the 83 hour [B]diviser[B], we are taking a $2250/annum paycut at min guarantee. That comes out to be 78 hours credit a month for second year FO, and 77 hours credit a month for a 3rd year 900 captain. And no, that's not including the mickey mouse perdiem increase, or the 401k, which again is a joke. Still a paycut at min guarantee, what I want to know is, why are people saying we need to credit 83 hours to break even.
Squak1200 is offline  
Old 10-22-2017, 03:00 PM
  #16787  
Gets Weekends Off
 
teddy3412's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 369
Default

Originally Posted by Squak1200 View Post
So for most people, this TA results in a paycut, but I dont understand why everyone is saying we have to credit 83 hours a month to break even. With the 83 hour [B]diviser[B], we are taking a $2250/annum paycut at min guarantee. That comes out to be 78 hours credit a month for second year FO, and 77 hours credit a month for a 3rd year 900 captain. And no, that's not including the mickey mouse perdiem increase, or the 401k, which again is a joke. Still a paycut at min guarantee, what I want to know is, why are people saying we need to credit 83 hours to break even.
Because they were told the current rate was based on 83 hours a month. So they think it takes 83 hours every month to make the same amount when in reality it takes what you just said to credit the same amount.
teddy3412 is offline  
Old 10-22-2017, 03:53 PM
  #16788  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: CRJ CA
Posts: 72
Default

Originally Posted by teddy3412 View Post
Because they were told the current rate was based on 83 hours a month. So they think it takes 83 hours every month to make the same amount when in reality it takes what you just said to credit the same amount.
Very interesting. I just did the math comparing a 10 year 900 Captain and found the same thing, that there is a difference of about $2,220 comparing the current book with bonus to TA without. In that case, one would have to work a maximum of an extra 1.6 hours per month to make up the difference.

I think what they are saying is that, at 83 hours worked before AND after the TA, there would be no difference in pay. But this is confusing because people think that if they are currently working 75 hours a month that they must now work 83 to break even. For someone like me, if I were currently crediting 75 hours I would have to now credit 76.6 in order to make the same pay, all other variables being the same.

The math:

CR9 10 to 11 year 2018 = $88.21
CR9.TA 10 to 11 year 2018 = $111.3

$88.21 x 75 x 12 = $79,389 (plus $23,000) = $102,389
$111.3 x 75 x 12 = $100,170 (difference of -$2,219)
$111.3 x 76.67 x 12 = $102,389

Last edited by Theoden; 10-22-2017 at 04:14 PM.
Theoden is offline  
Old 10-22-2017, 04:41 PM
  #16789  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2016
Posts: 139
Default

Originally Posted by Squak1200 View Post
So for most people, this TA results in a paycut, but I dont understand why everyone is saying we have to credit 83 hours a month to break even. With the 83 hour [B]diviser[B], we are taking a $2250/annum paycut at min guarantee. That comes out to be 78 hours credit a month for second year FO, and 77 hours credit a month for a 3rd year 900 captain. And no, that's not including the mickey mouse perdiem increase, or the 401k, which again is a joke. Still a paycut at min guarantee, what I want to know is, why are people saying we need to credit 83 hours to break even.
First off its a pay raise for all pilots except 280 who average below 83. Endeavor has tons of soft pay, it's difficult to be below an 83 average. The union emails have broken down every pilot into earning brackets, you should read them.

This may be a tough one for newbies to understand, but endeavor has industry leading soft pay. Only one person found themselves at the 75 hour rate average last year of the entire pilot group (not just voters, the entire pilot group). Judging from my captains, even the 2 yr guys here still haven't opened rainmaker. Unless you're dropping trips and reserve days month after month, you're not at the 75hr rate, which is why you're never going to get it.

Only 280 of us are below the 83 hours average, and I'm not one of them.

Vote yes, vote the pay raise.
PT6flyer is offline  
Old 10-22-2017, 06:21 PM
  #16790  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JSDL's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Round Two
Posts: 371
Default Rainmaker?

When will November's schedules load in rainmaker?

Thanks
JSDL is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
StraightShooter
Endeavor Air
124
06-26-2023 10:23 AM
WARich
Delta
11220
06-10-2020 07:42 AM
Crash
Major
3437
01-30-2013 06:51 PM
shua757
Major
2
02-24-2009 06:44 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices