Any "Latest & Greatest" about Endeavor?
10-08-2016, 05:39 AM
#7191
Property of Scheduling
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Bus driver
Posts: 2,525
The -200 is a Miata and the -900 is the Expedition. One is maneuverable, but not powerful and the other is able to climb and can carry more.
In the end, it's the same type rating and eventually it will be dual-qual anyway.
In the end, it's the same type rating and eventually it will be dual-qual anyway.
10-08-2016, 06:27 AM
#7192
spin 2
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: the big one
Posts: 437
Originally Posted by higney85
The -200 is a Miata and the -900 is the Expedition. One is maneuverable, but not powerful and the other is able to climb and can carry more.
In the end, it's the same type rating and eventually it will be dual-qual anyway.
In the end, it's the same type rating and eventually it will be dual-qual anyway.
10-08-2016, 06:43 AM
#7193
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Posts: 728
Originally Posted by stillcantfly
I agree, I think we will be flying both when ever the company wants. PSA, Skywest and I think expressjet fly all three in a trip! Like the others have said who cares the wheels go up and they come back down and they all land on a black peice of pavement some where other then home. I'd go with easiest commute or where you can stand to live.
Isn't it down more to the FSDO approving it? That was my understanding at least.
10-08-2016, 06:44 AM
#7194
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: the right side
Posts: 1,373
Originally Posted by stillcantfly
I agree, I think we will be flying both when ever the company wants. PSA, Skywest and I think expressjet fly all three in a trip! Like the others have said who cares the wheels go up and they come back down and they all land on a black peice of pavement some where other then home. I'd go with easiest commute or where you can stand to live.
Every original DC9 operator did it and it was never an issue there.
10-08-2016, 07:16 AM
#7195
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: CRJ FO
Posts: 4,599
It isn't a big deal if you've been flying both of the jets for a while. Some issues arose with our DECs who didn't have any time on the airplanes and brand new FOs who didn't have much experience were paired together on reserve and they could potentially fly the 2/7/9 in one day... However those days are pretty much gone because our airframes are more segregated by base (not totally but much more than they used to be) and we don't really have a lot of inexperienced crew being paired together like we did during our rapid growth period.
10-08-2016, 07:21 AM
#7196
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Posts: 728
Originally Posted by chrisreedrules
It isn't a big deal if you've been flying both of the jets for a while. Some issues arose with our DECs who didn't have any time on the airplanes and brand new FOs who didn't have much experience were paired together on reserve and they could potentially fly the 2/7/9 in one day... However those days are pretty much gone because our airframes are more segregated by base (not totally but much more than they used to be) and we don't really have a lot of inexperienced crew being paired together like we did during our rapid growth period.
I'm not keen on dual qual unless they make it worth it. Much better QOL on the 200 than 900 for me, and the trailing link gear helps me get that "nice landing" ego boost when giving 'buh-byes'.
10-08-2016, 09:39 AM
#7197
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Position: 6 Train - Panhandler
Posts: 2,001
16-05 is out. The upgrades appear to come to a screeching halt. Word on the street is that we are totally equipped until next spring in terms of aircraft count. I speculate that all hiring now until then will be to cover attrition.
Argument? Corroboration? Rumor mill?
Argument? Corroboration? Rumor mill?
10-08-2016, 10:03 AM
#7198
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 480
Originally Posted by TalkTurkey
16-05 is out. The upgrades appear to come to a screeching halt. Word on the street is that we are totally equipped until next spring in terms of aircraft count. I speculate that all hiring now until then will be to cover attrition.
Argument? Corroboration? Rumor mill?
Argument? Corroboration? Rumor mill?
Probably smart to hire a little in advance of any more aircraft come calling. Ive heard more 200s next year starting march from management but it's tough to tell what they mean sometimes.
10-08-2016, 10:09 AM
#7199
Banned
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Position: 6 Train - Panhandler
Posts: 2,001
Originally Posted by JesuitValen
Well attrition will be constant so check one.
Probably smart to hire a little in advance of any more aircraft come calling. Ive heard more 200s next year starting march from management but it's tough to tell what they mean sometimes.
Probably smart to hire a little in advance of any more aircraft come calling. Ive heard more 200s next year starting march from management but it's tough to tell what they mean sometimes.
10-08-2016, 10:22 AM
#7200
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,648
Originally Posted by TalkTurkey
I spoke to a techOps guy who was formerally domiciled in Kingman. He said they've all packed up and left there. No more coming out from there.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
