New PSA Pilot Pay Agreement
#271
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 4,177
Likes: 160
#274
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,510
Likes: 0
Looking at the Piedmont forum, it sounds like their MEC might have pushed back against an initial offer. I wonder if the companies are bound by the same NDAs? I would think with AA involved they would have to know what is going on with each other’s discussions.
#275
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
You’d think so. You’d also think AAG would have PDT & ENY proposing parity in rates with PSA. It should be that simple.
#277
#278
Line Holder
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
PDT is rejecting because they were only offered 50 seat rates. They don’t have a 76 seater plane so they feel it’s not fair. They know if PSA and Envoy have 76 seat rate PDT will never fill classes. All signs point to merger sooner rather than later.
#279
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,510
Likes: 0
I have always said it would make sense based on size on location to merge PSA and PDT. But the argument for PDT and ENY is the commonality of the 145. If you factor keeping PDT at a 50 seat rate, that certainly adds fuel to the ENY-PDT argument. Putting another 50ish 145s in the ENY system with PDT’s bases would really increase that suck factor for the fleet.
#280
Line Holder
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
I have always said it would make sense based on size on location to merge PSA and PDT. But the argument for PDT and ENY is the commonality of the 145. If you factor keeping PDT at a 50 seat rate, that certainly adds fuel to the ENY-PDT argument. Putting another 50ish 145s in the ENY system with PDT’s bases would really increase that suck factor for the fleet.
New/better management? Better value lines? More bases? Stronger union? More flow?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



