Search

Notices
Envoy Airlines Regional Airline

Envoy Information

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-29-2015 | 07:30 AM
  #501  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Cujo665
Using contractual requirements as the basis for the math, and what past performance of it has been is going to be the same regardless of who does the math.
The same was essentially said of Letter 3 on September 10, 2001. One needs to truly examine the foundation of the "math" to grasp its validity.

*see my previous two points about why Envoy can make these claims regarding the past flow numbers. The foundation is THEY HAD TO FLOW THESE PILOTS. Once the legal 824 are gone, different dynamics take over and the "6-year" projection (look up that term) is simply that.

A projection based on hypothetical that have YET to be anchored with commitments. UNLESS and UNTIL AAG (NOT Envoy) makes the necessary commitments, that's ALL that will ever be offered;

Projections.
Reply
Old 05-29-2015 | 07:33 AM
  #502  
Realtalk's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly
I think non-Envoy pilots would be smart not to bite at this latest carrot just yet (and if any airline has a history of cultivating enticing carrots to pilots over the last 19 years, it's this one). Again, so far ALL that has occurred regarding the future is PROMISES. Here's some facts;

Envoy has flowed X pilots to AA for the combination of two reasons. First, AA has been hiring (more modestly as of late though) and second, Envoy has been legally REQUIRED to flow the number of pilots it has over the last two years or so as part of the 824 grievance award. If AA is hiring (they are), Envoy management has NO choice to move these pilots to AA. HOWEVER..........once those 824 have flowed (500 or so to go), it becomes more of a contractual flow (the "protected pilots") and then the requirements can be altered or possibly even voided at some point in the future due to any number of scenarios including, but not limited to merger or even liquidation of Envoy.

Soon, it seems obvious that flow-throughs will be standard in the industry as all three legacies will have no choice but to adopt them for competitive reasons to protect their mainline feed.
Eaglefly thanks for putting this in perspective. Cujo, one question, why would anyone want to even work for aa?
Reply
Old 05-29-2015 | 07:33 AM
  #503  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Cujo665
They don't publish their fleet plan. You have to figure it our based on transfer schedules, SEC filings and other data. The reason for that is obvious. The CRJ transfer schedule on the PSA website is already the second transfer schedule, and now it's changed again such that Envoy needs to begin upgrading FO's to Captain. The upgrades are flow driven, not growth driven, and will continue long after other places stagnate, especially non-wholly owneds that don't have the flow to add to regular CA attrition.

What do you mean, you see no Commitment?
The commitment is 50% of every AA new hire class; and as you've seen we're doing well above that the past few years. Hate them all you like; their plan is working exactly as they said it would.

It's a good time to be an Envoy pilot
Ah !

So if the used car lot down the street has offered their cars at 10% discounts for the last 6 months, that means they will for the next 6 months ?

[laughter]

No........it's a good time to be an Envoy SALESMAN !
Reply
Old 05-29-2015 | 07:36 AM
  #504  
Cujo665's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 3,578
Likes: 48
From: Semi-Retired...
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly
I think non-Envoy pilots would be smart not to bite at this latest carrot just yet (and if any airline has a history of cultivating enticing carrots to pilots over the last 19 years, it's this one). Again, so far ALL that has occurred regarding the future is PROMISES. Here's some facts;
Promises?
Having flowed 62% instead of only the requires 50% isn't them keeping their promise to flow more when able? How are they not keeping their promise?

Originally Posted by eaglefly
Envoy has flowed X pilots to AA for the combination of two reasons. First, AA has been hiring (more modestly as of late though) and second, Envoy has been legally REQUIRED to flow the number of pilots it has over the last two years or so as part of the 824 grievance award. If AA is hiring (they are), Envoy management has NO choice to move these pilots to AA. HOWEVER..........once those 824 have flowed (500 or so to go), it becomes more of a contractual flow (the "protected pilots") and then the requirements can be altered or possibly even voided at some point in the future due to any number of scenarios including, but not limited to merger or even liquidation of Envoy.

Soon, it seems obvious that flow-throughs will be standard in the industry as all three legacies will have no choice but to adopt them for competitive reasons to protect their mainline feed.

Which is it big mouth? They're going to void the flow, or are the flows going to become standard?

You can't have it both ways.


It's working exactly as they said it would, better in fact... 12% above required. Guys hired today are looking at a less than 6 year flow to AA.
Just basic math.
Reply
Old 05-29-2015 | 07:36 AM
  #505  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,137
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Realtalk
Eaglefly thanks for putting this in perspective. Cujo, one question, why would anyone want to even work for aa?
AA is the new Southwest.
Reply
Old 05-29-2015 | 07:37 AM
  #506  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,137
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by FirstClass
I heard Republic flying out of MIA is being reduced.
I can't reveal although cujo might be able to.
Reply
Old 05-29-2015 | 07:39 AM
  #507  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Realtalk
Eaglefly thanks for putting this in perspective. Cujo, one question, why would anyone want to even work for aa?
This subject requires differing points-of-view so anyone considering such a move to Envoy can consider all angles. As for going to AA, I think future legacy pilots should also do as much research in what each of the 3 legacies offers their pilots contractually and the culture of how they see their pilots to best determine their goal carrier.
Reply
Old 05-29-2015 | 07:39 AM
  #508  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,137
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Skyvector
What would you like to hear, kiddo?

That Envoy has been over 60% of all new hires at AA for the past 2 years? Or how a new hire at Envoy today will upgrade in less than 2.5 years and flow to American within 6? With no interview, unlike PSA where it takes 20 years just to interview.

We have been saying these things not for PSA trolls like you but for new hires trying to decide where to go. But that's fine. Anybody who goes to PSA or anywhere else today will be making a lateral move to Envoy in about 6 months to a year when the PROOF of all we have been saying begins to materialize.

If new hires don't want to listen that's fine..they will waste their time and potential seniority here at Envoy because they were lured to PSA with false promises of PIC time..as if PIC is what is needed to get to mainline these days. FYI: it's not
I think its funny how both PilotCrusader and Skyvector use the word 'kiddo'. I know he is old and about to retire but these little mental slip ups!

Good Luck (and God Bless)!
Reply
Old 05-29-2015 | 07:41 AM
  #509  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Realtalk
Eaglefly thanks for putting this in perspective. Cujo, one question, why would anyone want to even work for aa?
Why would anyone want to work for AA? $$$$ is why. The only place I would take over AA is Delta.
Reply
Old 05-29-2015 | 07:44 AM
  #510  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,648
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by sublime259
Why would anyone want to work for AA? $$$$ is why. The only place I would take over AA is Delta.
AA pilots lost a lot in other sections of their contract to get that pay raise. I'm not saying AA is a bad place to work, but pay rates aren't everything.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
heading180
Regional
6398
08-18-2014 01:11 PM
bernoulli1129
Regional
2045
07-17-2014 12:05 PM
hoodabundy
United
219
08-18-2013 08:52 PM
scrtlvrby
Piedmont Airlines
11
08-19-2011 07:18 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices