Search

Notices
Envoy Airlines Regional Airline

New Envoy Information

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-10-2016 | 10:31 AM
  #2841  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by highflyer1980
I agree with this statement. I've noticed more "where should I go?" threads have popped up again. More about asking of making lateral moves. In my experience the key to a better success in the regional world is that quote. I started in Mesa then had enough and moved to Eagle. Even though the seniority lost during that transition was substantial, I still believe it was a smart move. Contract was a great IMPROVEMENT. (2007)

Today? I really don't know. I have lost touch with any Mesa buddies. But this is great advice for any prospective pilot. I do slightly sympathize with the "waiters" because I also did my time in turboprops. That was one of my key reasons why I left Mesa as well. Tired of either being completely frozen during winter, or losing 10lbs of water weight during the summer. (Dash8-100s) Pax always freaking out and complaining because it's a flying boat. (I had an American guy call us a "mosquito" on JFK ground freq. LOL)

However, passing up the 145, because it's a 50 seater is ludicrously dumb. If you want to complain about an airplane, fly a turboprop that is as old as the MD80. Or better yet, a C172!! LOL.... Be happy you at least got hired.
But 145s don't look as good as 175s on their Instagram accounts!
Reply
Old 05-10-2016 | 11:22 AM
  #2842  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by boiler07
But 145s don't look as good as 175s on their Instagram accounts!
That ATR looked pretty BA on my Motorola Razr
Reply
Old 05-10-2016 | 11:31 AM
  #2843  
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 787
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by DilsonWic
That ATR looked pretty BA on my Motorola Razr
Day off at JetBlue?
Reply
Old 05-10-2016 | 11:52 AM
  #2844  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 501
Likes: 0
From: A320 FO
Default

Originally Posted by boiler07
But 145s don't look as good as 175s on their Instagram accounts!


Actually, I like how cool the 145 looks after takeoff. Especially when some guys rotate a little slower than normal with the gear up. Plus, I really like the simplicity of the airplane as well. So easy to hand fly out of the sim and IOE.
Reply
Old 05-10-2016 | 12:49 PM
  #2845  
N927EV's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 771
Likes: 0
From: Qualified to carry liquids through security.
Default

Originally Posted by highflyer1980
Actually, I like how cool the 145 looks after takeoff. Especially when some guys rotate a little slower than normal with the gear up. Plus, I really like the simplicity of the airplane as well. So easy to hand fly out of the sim and IOE.

They've all got their positives and negatives. I honestly always enjoyed the variety of flying on the 145. Small airports, big airports, Caribbean flying, and actually having to shoot something other than an ILS! But, I digress. I guess it's just not the same without the engines under the wings. ☹️
Reply
Old 05-10-2016 | 01:17 PM
  #2846  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
From: CRJ F/O
Default

Is the current contract available online? I've googled it, but no luck.
Reply
Old 05-10-2016 | 01:28 PM
  #2847  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 501
Likes: 0
From: A320 FO
Default

Originally Posted by N927EV
They've all got their positives and negatives. I honestly always enjoyed the variety of flying on the 145. Small airports, big airports, Caribbean flying, and actually having to shoot something other than an ILS! But, I digress. I guess it's just not the same without the engines under the wings. ☹️


That's true. Nothing like doing two 15 minute flights, then doing a 2.5 to 3 hour flight.
Reply
Old 05-10-2016 | 02:13 PM
  #2848  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by highflyer1980
Actually, I like how cool the 145 looks after takeoff. Especially when some guys rotate a little slower than normal with the gear up. Plus, I really like the simplicity of the airplane as well. So easy to hand fly out of the sim and IOE.
But it doesn't have slats, you cannot stand up completely in it and most importantly, you can't puff your chest out as much when you say, "I'm an airline pilot" (especially to chicks).

Size DOES matter to the airline pilot.
Reply
Old 05-10-2016 | 05:08 PM
  #2849  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Default

Wow, are pilots really giving up seniority based on equipment type? That is completely ridiculous. New pilots considering working here, please understand: seniority is everything. Your initial equipment assignment as a new hire can easily change because of future displacements and vacancies. The only thing that matters is to get as early a seniority number as possible. Period.
Reply
Old 05-10-2016 | 06:25 PM
  #2850  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 894
Likes: 0
Default

The 145 is actually a lot more fun to fly than the 175 and the new hires would be much better off learning in it to be honest. If it was up to me they would all start out in it and would all become better pilots because of it. THEN, move up to the 175 auto-jet after they mastered that. You actually got to fly the 145, it's very forgiving, like a trainer, hard to get yourself into trouble, can go as slow as you want, decent like a rock if you need too, its very basic and you learn a lot about flying simple basic jet aircraft with large margins of error built in and a huge safe speed range to play with, and you are regularly hand flying different things in all kinds of conditions, very short runways, uncontrolled at night, crappy weather hand flying approaches, actually flying stars and crossing restrictions manually, fun visual approaches into podunk fields with no tower, and it teaches you a lot.

The CRJ 700 is a step up, it is more advanced, more of a critical wing, slats, less forgiving up at high altitudes, less forgiving with speeds, harder to slow down, more powerful, it will bite you in the a ss if you screw up and get too slow up high, heavy or hot, it's harder to land, you do WAY less non precision approaches, less fun visual approaches, mostly all you do is controlled field, big airport, straight in ILS type of crap just due to the nature of where we fly it.

Where the E175 you don't really "fly" it at all anymore with auto throttles and VNAV, you're just an automation monitor, you program the FMS to do EVERYTHING, then just sit back and make sure it actually does it, no more pushing buttons on the overhead or using judgement to make a crossing restriction, no more trying to slow down and maintain speed in gusty winds on an approach, no more thinking about what do I need to do now to make this happen, it does it all for you until you click off the autopilot at 50' for landing. Hand flying it is discouraged. Then you don't even pull the thrust levers back to land, it even does that for you at 30'. You really don't do anything anymore. Yeah, it's nicer and bigger, and way better for the passengers, but flying it isn't even flying anymore. This is from someone that has been on all 3 of our jets now.

Honestly the Saab was the most fun plane here I flew and glad I did it. The 175 is boring compared to the others and will make you lose all your skills, your scan will go to hell and you will become lazy since you are no longer even required to fly it at all once you learn to program the box on this thing. The one thing actually beneficial about the 175 is it is a good transition aircraft to a 737/Airbus or similar mainline aircraft because the FMS/auto-throttles and VNAV is about the same.

Funny thing is if you were to click off the autopilot and auto throttles on a new hire on the 175, take away his VNAV info and tell him to fly the STAR into DFW with all the between altitude step downs with speed restrictions, he would be completely screwed because he has no experience or skills to do it because of this jet normally doing everything for you, and that is how we are trained to operate it. It's not their fault, they never learned to actually fly a jet without all the higher level automation.. just the way it is now.

Nothing wrong with flying a 145 or a CRJ7, both are way the hell better than a C-172 or a Seminole.

Last edited by RyanP; 05-10-2016 at 07:02 PM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
satpak77
Envoy Airlines
82
03-25-2020 05:55 AM
heading180
Regional
6398
08-18-2014 01:11 PM
bernoulli1129
Regional
2045
07-17-2014 12:05 PM
DFWEMB
Envoy Airlines
53
02-03-2014 10:02 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices