Search
Notices
Envoy Airlines Regional Airline

New Envoy Information

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-03-2016, 10:39 AM
  #3061  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2015
Posts: 687
Default

Originally Posted by MD-11Loader View Post
While the overnights at home would be nice, for me, it is about getting the 170, so DFW for now, and hopefully ORD in the future.
A 2 leg commute so you can fly the 175? That's craziness! I've been told GRR to ORD is kinda tough. And I know ORD to DFW is really tough. God luck. If I were you I'd just take ORD and be much happier.
moon is offline  
Old 06-03-2016, 10:43 AM
  #3062  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by MD-11Loader View Post
While the overnights at home would be nice, for me, it is about getting the 170, so DFW for now, and hopefully ORD in the future.
Just curious, but I have a couple of questions about what is motivating some to pronounce their love affair with the E-175.

To wit, what is it about it that makes you sacrifice other quality of life issues just to fly it ? What will you do if you're subsequently displaced out of it ? What benefits do you think it will bring you in how it looks on a resume to other carriers ?

Although I understand many have different reasons, what are some of yours ?
eaglefly is offline  
Old 06-03-2016, 10:53 AM
  #3063  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 176
Default

25.84 starting pay 😑
Mistek89 is offline  
Old 06-03-2016, 11:11 AM
  #3064  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,533
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly View Post
Just curious, but I have a couple of questions about what is motivating some to pronounce their love affair with the E-175.

To wit, what is it about it that makes you sacrifice other quality of life issues just to fly it ? What will you do if you're subsequently displaced out of it ? What benefits do you think it will bring you in how it looks on a resume to other carriers ?

Although I understand many have different reasons, what are some of yours ?
I'm also curious.
450knotOffice is offline  
Old 06-03-2016, 12:25 PM
  #3065  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Posts: 894
Default

Originally Posted by MD-11Loader View Post
While the overnights at home would be nice, for me, it is about getting the 170, so DFW for now, and hopefully ORD in the future.
Go to ORD and have a quick 30 minute commute across the lake or drive to work if you absolutely have too. Your life will be exponentially better. Commuting to DFW for the 175 would be the dumbest move ever when you have a base right there. Have you ever sat 3 hours in a CRJ jumpseat? Shove yourself into one of your kitchen cabinets for 3 hours sitting on a bucket, that is what its feels like.. And it's mostly on Mesa, ughhh....

Plus 13 flights a day to ORD vs only 3 a day to DFW.
RyanP is offline  
Old 06-03-2016, 01:32 PM
  #3066  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2016
Posts: 417
Default

Originally Posted by 450knotOffice View Post
I'm also curious.
While I can't say I would chose an airline or a 2 leg commute for a specific aircraft; I can understand those that choose to do so. We are all trying to make our resume look better for the next job, whatever that may be. I think most pilots would agree that an Airbus type would make you more competitive, and of course southwest used to require the 737 type to even be considered. It is possible that the legacies would be more interested in someone with a 170/5 type over a 145 type. Although that is pretty unlikely it is a fact that most of the overseas jobs want a pilot with experience either in a certain type, sometimes a 170/5 or in an aircraft over a certain weight. The 145 and crj200 are both too small to qualify.

So while it may not be the best career decision to defer seniority or qol for a certain type, there is a remote possibility that it could make a difference in some certain circumstances.
SEPfield is offline  
Old 06-03-2016, 01:48 PM
  #3067  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by SEPfield View Post
While I can't say I would chose an airline or a 2 leg commute for a specific aircraft; I can understand those that choose to do so. We are all trying to make our resume look better for the next job, whatever that may be. I think most pilots would agree that an Airbus type would make you more competitive, and of course southwest used to require the 737 type to even be considered. It is possible that the legacies would be more interested in someone with a 170/5 type over a 145 type. Although that is pretty unlikely it is a fact that most of the overseas jobs want a pilot with experience either in a certain type, sometimes a 170/5 or in an aircraft over a certain weight. The 145 and crj200 are both too small to qualify.

So while it may not be the best career decision to defer seniority or qol for a certain type, there is a remote possibility that it could make a difference in some certain circumstances.
I have to disagree, but if so, the possibility is VERY remote. When it comes to RJ's (and like it or not, the E-175 is in the RJ class), they are all equal and "jet time" at the regionals is jet time to the legacies and LCC's, etc. I've yet to hear of anyone reporting the regional E-jets as anything other then a neutral factor over other RJ's. Same goes for the CRJ-900, which is of comparable size and weight. Another thing to consider is that with only 40 aircraft at Envoy, unless you're holding a hard line, you're less likely to fly as much as those in fleets with more aircraft, so what DOES count (flight time) will be a likely disadvantage all other things being equal. The SWA 737 issue is apples vs. oranges to this.

It's just my opinion, but I think the philosophy you bring up here would be rationalizing the irrational curb appeal of a desirable aircraft that essentially offers nothing more then the curb appeal aspects themselves. I suppose if your primary target is a far East job in an E-190, maybe, but anything U.S. wise, an RJ is an RJ is an RJ.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 06-03-2016, 02:23 PM
  #3068  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 176
Default

Skywest e175 has an ORD Jr. base , That would make more sense . Or just move to dfw
Mistek89 is offline  
Old 06-03-2016, 02:44 PM
  #3069  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2015
Posts: 540
Default

An Envoy recruiter was on here a while back posting pictures of the 175. I guess he thinks it's pretty special.
ag386 is offline  
Old 06-03-2016, 03:37 PM
  #3070  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Posts: 130
Default

What's the commute like from Nashville to ORD? I'm currently in DFW but I don't think I will get anything based in DFW. If I end up with ORD I plan on moving back to Nashville.
tall guy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
satpak77
Envoy Airlines
82
03-25-2020 05:55 AM
heading180
Regional
6098
08-18-2014 01:11 PM
bernoulli1129
Regional
1809
07-17-2014 12:05 PM
DFWEMB
Envoy Airlines
48
02-03-2014 09:52 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices