Search

Notices
Envoy Airlines Regional Airline

New Envoy Information

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-14-2016 | 10:48 PM
  #5361  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,576
Likes: 20
Default

Originally Posted by MD-11Loader
it would be better off to select an older plane with first officers who are upgrading off of it, and an easier commute with 14 flights to ORD and 3 to MDW per day, as opposed to a newer plane that won't have upgrades coming
Originally Posted by leica typ240
...again, this is misinformation. just because the 175 is a newer plane, it doesn't mean you or anyone recently hired will have a faster
upgrade than potential new hires choosing the "older" jets!!!

GRR to ORD is a much better option, than holding out for that 175 in dfw!

enjoy
Not what he meant. What he's saying is that the upward movement from relatively junior to relatively senior on that jet should be faster due to the more senior FO's who fly it upgrading up and out. Senior FO's moving up and out means upward movement up the FO list on that jet, leading to potentially better quality of life.
Reply
Old 10-15-2016 | 05:48 AM
  #5362  
MD-11Loader's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,138
Likes: 0
From: Pawn
Default

Originally Posted by 450knotOffice
Not what he meant. What he's saying is that the upward movement from relatively junior to relatively senior on that jet should be faster due to the more senior FO's who fly it upgrading up and out. Senior FO's moving up and out means upward movement up the FO list on that jet, leading to potentially better quality of life.
Exactly. I've been in this business for 16 years, I know how it works. I will upgrade when my number says I can. With all of the upgrades coming off off the ERJ and CR7, it is logical to me that my position seniority will improve faster on those aircraft due to the upgrades coming from them as opposed to the 175 which is all new hires so there is little movement from above.
Reply
Old 10-15-2016 | 06:40 AM
  #5363  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
From: middle seat in the back
Default

Originally Posted by MD-11Loader
Exactly. I've been in this business for 16 years, I know how it works. I will upgrade when my number says I can. With all of the upgrades coming off off the ERJ and CR7, it is logical to me that my position seniority will improve faster on those aircraft due to the upgrades coming from them as opposed to the 175 which is all new hires so there is little movement from above.
^^^^^^This guy gets it
Reply
Old 10-15-2016 | 07:21 AM
  #5364  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 894
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by MD-11Loader
Exactly. I've been in this business for 16 years, I know how it works. I will upgrade when my number says I can. With all of the upgrades coming off off the ERJ and CR7, it is logical to me that my position seniority will improve faster on those aircraft due to the upgrades coming from them as opposed to the 175 which is all new hires so there is little movement from above.
Just to clarify.. The 175 isnt "all" new hires. There is still quite a few more mid to senior FO's on it. I dont have a list in front of me to say exact numbers.. But a lot of our current guys bid/displaced into it initially. After "that" its been all new hires but the others are still there and will be upgrading.

2nd thing is the fleet is only at about 60% of it's planned size and with guy in training scheduled through the end of the year probably staffed to about 70% or so? Just a guess. So if you got in now there would still be a lot of relative movement as its staffed all the way up to 40 acft. You would get a relative bump of about 30% with people below you and about 20-30% from people above you upgrading over the next year. So it would put you somewhere in the middle. 8-10 months from now, you are correct though and getting on the bottom of that list will be much slower moving than the other fleets as there will be no more growth. (That we know of).

But you are better off with ORD anyway so it doesn't really matter.
Reply
Old 10-15-2016 | 07:22 AM
  #5365  
banana380's Avatar
Standing by to Stand By
 
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: Holding
Default

Any chance we can start a new thread to fix all the empty pages, and/or have the mods make separate forums for each regional like the major list?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 10-15-2016 | 08:07 AM
  #5366  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,413
Likes: 0
From: forever fo
Default

I'm not sure how ord will shake out with the current realignment at envoy. Lga just took 150 pilots mostly ord and now we talk about Miami. Also if psa is coming to ord with a base and the 700s go it leaves a much much much smaller ord. That relative seniority theory is gone. Also we are taking deliverers of the 175 so it's still a growing fleet.
Reply
Old 10-15-2016 | 08:20 AM
  #5367  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 271
Likes: 3
Default

Originally Posted by lakehouse
I'm not sure how ord will shake out with the current realignment at envoy. Lga just took 150 pilots mostly ord and now we talk about Miami. Also if psa is coming to ord with a base and the 700s go it leaves a much much much smaller ord. That relative seniority theory is gone. Also we are taking deliverers of the 175 so it's still a growing fleet.
SkyWest is transitioning around 30 700s from our UA flying over to the AA side for a total of around 37 aiframes I believe since we already had 7 in LAX. A little over half of those planes are going to be based in ORD from what we're told. Not sure how that impacts PSA's potential 700 base plans in Chicago.
Reply
Old 10-15-2016 | 08:21 AM
  #5368  
Icaruss's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
From: Pilot
Default

Just curious, if Envoy is filling up 50 guys a month for the next six months. That's about 300 pilots, will they be needing that many pilots lets say for the next 12 monts (600 pilots)? I'm new at this, so I'm not sure what is the attrition rate or flow rate per year.
Reply
Old 10-15-2016 | 08:59 AM
  #5369  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,413
Likes: 0
From: forever fo
Default

Originally Posted by Icaruss
Just curious, if Envoy is filling up 50 guys a month for the next six months. That's about 300 pilots, will they be needing that many pilots lets say for the next 12 monts (600 pilots)? I'm new at this, so I'm not sure what is the attrition rate or flow rate per year.
All indications say 600 for 2017 is the goal and the moves have been made to make it very realistic. They are setup for 25/class and 50/Mo for the next few months. Most likely with the positive feedback loop it won't be hard to continue that indefinitely.
Reply
Old 10-15-2016 | 09:22 AM
  #5370  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 894
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Icaruss
Just curious, if Envoy is filling up 50 guys a month for the next six months. That's about 300 pilots, will they be needing that many pilots lets say for the next 12 monts (600 pilots)? I'm new at this, so I'm not sure what is the attrition rate or flow rate per year.
We will lose between 450-500+ pilots easily next year through flow and other airline attrition. Flow number alone is predicted at 300 in 2017 by AA right now. We only have around 1700ish active pilots on property so losing around 500 is a big impact. 6+ year upgrades will be ancient history soon.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
satpak77
Envoy Airlines
82
03-25-2020 05:55 AM
heading180
Regional
6398
08-18-2014 01:11 PM
bernoulli1129
Regional
2045
07-17-2014 12:05 PM
DFWEMB
Envoy Airlines
53
02-03-2014 10:02 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices