Envoy
#1893
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 178
Upgrade times
I was doing some napkin math on upgrade times and was curious where the numbers are coming from.
If Envoy is hiring 60 or so per month as they have the past five months, that is roughly 720 per year. If the numbers on APC of 1850 pilots is accurate, I would guess slightly more than half of those are captains, or say 950, leaving 900 first officers. At the rate of 60 per month, it will only be 15 months to hire 900 new first officers. I'm reasonably certain not all of the attrition is captains, but even adding 20 percent to that should mean someone hired in this wave could make it to captain in 18 months.
Or am I missing part of the equation?
If Envoy is hiring 60 or so per month as they have the past five months, that is roughly 720 per year. If the numbers on APC of 1850 pilots is accurate, I would guess slightly more than half of those are captains, or say 950, leaving 900 first officers. At the rate of 60 per month, it will only be 15 months to hire 900 new first officers. I'm reasonably certain not all of the attrition is captains, but even adding 20 percent to that should mean someone hired in this wave could make it to captain in 18 months.
Or am I missing part of the equation?
#1894
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Posts: 854
I was doing some napkin math on upgrade times and was curious where the numbers are coming from.
If Envoy is hiring 60 or so per month as they have the past five months, that is roughly 720 per year. If the numbers on APC of 1850 pilots is accurate, I would guess slightly more than half of those are captains, or say 950, leaving 900 first officers. At the rate of 60 per month, it will only be 15 months to hire 900 new first officers. I'm reasonably certain not all of the attrition is captains, but even adding 20 percent to that should mean someone hired in this wave could make it to captain in 18 months.
Or am I missing part of the equation?
If Envoy is hiring 60 or so per month as they have the past five months, that is roughly 720 per year. If the numbers on APC of 1850 pilots is accurate, I would guess slightly more than half of those are captains, or say 950, leaving 900 first officers. At the rate of 60 per month, it will only be 15 months to hire 900 new first officers. I'm reasonably certain not all of the attrition is captains, but even adding 20 percent to that should mean someone hired in this wave could make it to captain in 18 months.
Or am I missing part of the equation?
#1895
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2016
Posts: 1,609
I was doing some napkin math on upgrade times and was curious where the numbers are coming from.
If Envoy is hiring 60 or so per month as they have the past five months, that is roughly 720 per year. If the numbers on APC of 1850 pilots is accurate, I would guess slightly more than half of those are captains, or say 950, leaving 900 first officers. At the rate of 60 per month, it will only be 15 months to hire 900 new first officers. I'm reasonably certain not all of the attrition is captains, but even adding 20 percent to that should mean someone hired in this wave could make it to captain in 18 months.
Or am I missing part of the equation?
If Envoy is hiring 60 or so per month as they have the past five months, that is roughly 720 per year. If the numbers on APC of 1850 pilots is accurate, I would guess slightly more than half of those are captains, or say 950, leaving 900 first officers. At the rate of 60 per month, it will only be 15 months to hire 900 new first officers. I'm reasonably certain not all of the attrition is captains, but even adding 20 percent to that should mean someone hired in this wave could make it to captain in 18 months.
Or am I missing part of the equation?
#1896
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2016
Posts: 1,609
There are two seniority numbers. One gets updated every six months on the master seniority list and the other gets updated slightly more frequently. This number is found in DECS and can be very different than the master seniority list since we have high attrition.
#1897
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 579
Students going to Paris would most likely be the Qualified upgrades....more prepared and less affected by the distractions.
For Instructors it will most likely be only check airman since they can teach and do the checking events....the company doesn't want to send over more people than they have to. Plus I heard it is only one sim.
For Instructors it will most likely be only check airman since they can teach and do the checking events....the company doesn't want to send over more people than they have to. Plus I heard it is only one sim.
#1899
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,523
Not necessarily. The FMS units will need to be installed anyway to be compliant with ADS-B requirements even if they go to PDT. AAG pays for it so it doesn't matter who of the two carriers are operating the planes when the FMS's get installed. And from what I've heard, the latest is that WIFI isn't going to happen as originally indicated.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post