Envoy
12-05-2017 | 12:57 PM
#6041
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,523
Likes: 0
12-05-2017 | 03:19 PM
#6043
On Reserve
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Depends on if we, PSA, can staff the aircraft. We're having issues with MX, their contract and crew efficiencies on the pilot side.
Personally, I think they will stay with y'all a bit longer then planned. Plus we're getting the hanger queens. Not that I blame y'all for keeping the good tails till last.
AAG wants them over at PSA ASAP. But PSA is throttling the transfers and AAG is slowly getting more annoyed from what I've heard via union all calls and MX guys.
Personally, I think they will stay with y'all a bit longer then planned. Plus we're getting the hanger queens. Not that I blame y'all for keeping the good tails till last.
AAG wants them over at PSA ASAP. But PSA is throttling the transfers and AAG is slowly getting more annoyed from what I've heard via union all calls and MX guys.
Thanks for the insight. My class date is this summer. Got my eyes on the 700 (already CL-65 typed) ORD is an easy commute for me.
12-05-2017 | 05:28 PM
#6044
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Not a troll post. Envoy is getting additional airplanes and the CRJ pilots will go on to the new aircraft. PSA has had full classes for a couple months and has more than enough pilots.
Last edited by daOldMan; 12-05-2017 at 05:40 PM.
12-05-2017 | 06:12 PM
#6046
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 674
Likes: 0
Depends on if we, PSA, can staff the aircraft. We're having issues with MX, their contract and crew efficiencies on the pilot side.
Personally, I think they will stay with y'all a bit longer then planned. Plus we're getting the hanger queens. Not that I blame y'all for keeping the good tails till last.
AAG wants them over at PSA ASAP. But PSA is throttling the transfers and AAG is slowly getting more annoyed from what I've heard via union all calls and MX guys.
Personally, I think they will stay with y'all a bit longer then planned. Plus we're getting the hanger queens. Not that I blame y'all for keeping the good tails till last.
AAG wants them over at PSA ASAP. But PSA is throttling the transfers and AAG is slowly getting more annoyed from what I've heard via union all calls and MX guys.
12-05-2017 | 06:20 PM
#6047
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 674
Likes: 0
Expect PSA to start taking planes at 2 or more a month starting early 2018. It will accelerate as there are fewer and fewer left. There are 27 700s left at Envoy now. They will all be at PSA in 2018.
Not a troll post. Envoy is getting additional airplanes and the CRJ pilots will go on to the new aircraft. PSA has had full classes for a couple months and has more than enough pilots.
Not a troll post. Envoy is getting additional airplanes and the CRJ pilots will go on to the new aircraft. PSA has had full classes for a couple months and has more than enough pilots.
Btw if you want rumors, I've heard from several reliable sources a very different story from what you posit. I've also heard from separate reliable sources that your information is accurate. Seems like no one knows what's really going on, eh?
12-05-2017 | 06:39 PM
#6048
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
[QUOTE=Ijustlikeflying;2478013]
Actually, you must be new because to think that AAG cares about feelings and where they want their planes flying is ridiculous. Just because they were supposed to originally come to us, doesn’t mean they are rightfully ours. AAG will place any of their aircraft with the most cost effective/profitable option. Maybe that’s us, maybe it’s not. Last I checked, the pilots at Envoy don’t sit in on fleet planning meetings, so how would you know anyways. All I’m saying is we are more likely to open probably 5other bases before we go opening LA.
Why would AA keep those 175s with compass when envoy can do that flying? A WO
Actually, you must be new because to think that AAG cares about feelings and where they want their planes flying is ridiculous. Just because they were supposed to originally come to us, doesn’t mean they are rightfully ours. AAG will place any of their aircraft with the most cost effective/profitable option. Maybe that’s us, maybe it’s not. Last I checked, the pilots at Envoy don’t sit in on fleet planning meetings, so how would you know anyways. All I’m saying is we are more likely to open probably 5other bases before we go opening LA.
Why would AA keep those 175s with compass when envoy can do that flying? A WO
12-05-2017 | 06:45 PM
#6049
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 0
Actually, you must be new because to think that AAG cares about feelings and where they want their planes flying is ridiculous. Just because they were supposed to originally come to us, doesn’t mean they are rightfully ours. AAG will place any of their aircraft with the most cost effective/profitable option. Maybe that’s us, maybe it’s not. Last I checked, the pilots at Envoy don’t sit in on fleet planning meetings, so how would you know anyways. All I’m saying is we are more likely to open probably 5other bases before we go opening LA.
12-05-2017 | 06:54 PM
#6050
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 674
Likes: 0
Why would AA keep those 175s at Compass when Envoy, a WO, can do that flying? Not to mention all the rumors of failed attempts at trying to end that contract early by AMR. Also you sound very adamant and against a LAX base, at least from your tone. Why? Who cares if they open one or not.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
