Search

Notices
Envoy Airlines Regional Airline

Envoy

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-17-2018 | 10:40 AM
  #9631  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Default

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/air-canada-pilots-get-permission-to-wear-beards-1.4825104?cmp=rss

This would be nice for us too
Reply
Old 09-17-2018 | 11:46 AM
  #9632  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,510
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by EnyFlyr
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/air-canada-pilots-get-permission-to-wear-beards-1.4825104?cmp=rss

This would be nice for us too
The reason for prohibition of facial hair is so you can get a seal on your oxygen mask. It’s a safety issue, not just a grooming thing.
Reply
Old 09-17-2018 | 11:55 AM
  #9633  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by EnyFlyr
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/air-canada-pilots-get-permission-to-wear-beards-1.4825104?cmp=rss

This would be nice for us too
Yeah, so all the kids who just finished puberty (myself included) can rock a patchy chin-pube look
Reply
Old 09-17-2018 | 11:58 AM
  #9634  
In a land of unicorns
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 103
From: Whale FO
Default

Originally Posted by pitchattitude
The reason for prohibition of facial hair is so you can get a seal on your oxygen mask. It’s a safety issue, not just a grooming thing.
Urban legend. Any quick donning mask seals 100% fine with facial hair, the note on the mask is from a faulty test done in the 80's.
Everywhere else in the world (plus firefighters etc), the mask works fine with facial hair.

http://www.sfu.ca/sfunews/stories/20...n-pilots-.html

Almost every study that has been conducted since the 80's (or actually I think early 70's when this myth first got released) has ended with the same conclusion.

"The report concludes that, “The policy was based on outdated research on obsolete equipment and testing on respirators not intended for aircrew oxygen delivery.” Ferguson adds, “We found no adverse effects on bearded subjects within the two parameters of our study.”"
Reply
Old 09-17-2018 | 12:03 PM
  #9635  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Houpilot2001
Discuss....lol

https://www.inc.com/chris-matyszczyk/a-pilot-for-an-american-airlines-regional-carrier-quit-then-he-made-a-controversial-youtube-video-to-explain-why.html
I get his points, but he’s pretty petty about it. Maybe he should have driven the hour to commute out of Tampa or move to base. Learn how to pack a bag of nuts or spend 5 minutes in line at subway to eat in the cockpit. A 30 minute turn is plenty enough to say, “hey cap, mind if you get the walk around? Im going to poke my head up the jet bridge to grab something to eat.”
Reply
Old 09-17-2018 | 12:06 PM
  #9636  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 2,510
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by dera
Urban legend. Any quick donning mask seals 100% fine with facial hair, the note on the mask is from a faulty test done in the 80's.
Everywhere else in the world (plus firefighters etc), the mask works fine with facial hair.
Then maybe that’s just the military with the chemical masks.

But do you really want to look more like the cabin crew?
Reply
Old 09-17-2018 | 12:06 PM
  #9637  
MD-11Loader's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,138
Likes: 0
From: Pawn
Default

Originally Posted by pitchattitude
The reason for prohibition of facial hair is so you can get a seal on your oxygen mask. It’s a safety issue, not just a grooming thing.
Too bad that AC just funded a study that debunked that myth. It needs to come to the US. Facial hair can be professional. Look at Air France or KLM. They allow their pilots to have a bit of scruff.
Reply
Old 09-17-2018 | 12:12 PM
  #9638  
In a land of unicorns
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 103
From: Whale FO
Default

Originally Posted by pitchattitude
Then maybe that’s just the military with the chemical masks.

But do you really want to look more like the cabin crew?
I _hate_ fake science. That is why this "no beards because of oxygen masks" is a pet peeve of mine.

I'd much rather see a policy that says "since we think clean shave looks more professional, we don't allow hipster beards here", instead of this pseudo-scientific mumbojumbo about oxygen masks.
I'm fine with banning beards, I just don't like when science is abused for that purpose
Reply
Old 09-17-2018 | 01:07 PM
  #9639  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by pitchattitude
The reason for prohibition of facial hair is so you can get a seal on your oxygen mask. It’s a safety issue, not just a grooming thing.

“In the fall of 2016, they placed participants with facial hair ranging from stubble to beards grown to waist-length in a chamber where they simulated altitudes from 10,000 to 25,000 feet above sea level.

The men wore two different models of mask supplied by Air Canada while researchers monitored their blood oxygen saturation levels and tested respirators for protection against carbon monoxide or toxic fumes in the case of smoke in the cabin.

"It was 100 per cent success," she said.

"We had no one fail the study, regardless of beard length."
Reply
Old 09-17-2018 | 02:00 PM
  #9640  
In a land of unicorns
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 103
From: Whale FO
Default

Originally Posted by EnyFlyr
“In the fall of 2016, they placed participants with facial hair ranging from stubble to beards grown to waist-length in a chamber where they simulated altitudes from 10,000 to 25,000 feet above sea level.

The men wore two different models of mask supplied by Air Canada while researchers monitored their blood oxygen saturation levels and tested respirators for protection against carbon monoxide or toxic fumes in the case of smoke in the cabin.

"It was 100 per cent success," she said.

"We had no one fail the study, regardless of beard length."
Europeans have known this for a long time. The whole no-beard movement is from the 70's and has zero scientific base. The FAA AC's etc are complete nonsense with nothing to back them up.

This needs to change - either to accept the fact that it's just a thing of image and use that as an excuse, or stop using oxygen masks as the reason for it.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PilotCrusader
Envoy Airlines
120
05-31-2016 09:02 AM
diva
Envoy Airlines
729
09-19-2015 10:03 AM
somedayillcare
Envoy Airlines
1
12-10-2014 02:30 AM
Romulus
Envoy Airlines
16
10-15-2014 05:47 PM
RJ Pilot
Envoy Airlines
2413
07-16-2014 12:52 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices