Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > Retired Regionals > ExpressJet
What's the Latest at ASA/Expressjet? >

What's the Latest at ASA/Expressjet?

Search
Notices
ExpressJet Regional Airline

What's the Latest at ASA/Expressjet?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-01-2013, 06:18 PM
  #3371  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Trip7's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,414
Default

Originally Posted by Southerner:1437792
Originally Posted by Trip7 View Post

Same type of arguements that came out when airlines started transitioning to two man cockpits. Airlines are a business, not a job core. As long as a fair amount of savings is transferred to pilot compensation Dual Qual should be embraced by the pilot group just like PBS was.
Wow. I had no idea you guys were going to dual qual...ERJ & CRJ. That's amazing!

Oh wait...you guys probably mean common category flying between the CR2/CR7/CR9, since they are all the same type, right?


Dual qual = one dude flying two types (ERJ and CRJ, for instance). It wasn't a big deal that it was used incorrectly when there was only one type on property, but now you've got two different types. To call flying a CRJ and a CRJ dual qual is stupid.

I guess I shouldn't care, since ignorant people don't give a sh!t, but I have to try.
Thanks for the tech briefing. I know that already. Over at ASA we call common category dual qual. Even the union uses the same term. Unless I'm presenting a dissertation at an FAA forum, I'll keep calling it dual qual for simplicity's sake
Trip7 is offline  
Old 07-01-2013, 06:30 PM
  #3372  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Posts: 200
Angry

No dual qual!!!!
701EV is offline  
Old 07-01-2013, 06:51 PM
  #3373  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2012
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 279
Default

Originally Posted by 701EV View Post
No dual qual!!!!
While there are some major issues to be ironed out, I can think of about 650 Atl based 200 drivers that would give this serious consideration when compared to what, I believe, will be the consequences of the new FT/DT regs.
gatorhater is offline  
Old 07-01-2013, 08:22 PM
  #3374  
Gets Weekends Off
 
tomgoodman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: 767A (Ret)
Posts: 6,248
Default

FWIW, many years ago Delta had a no-kidding dual qual program, e.g. a 727 S/O also current (barely) as a DC-9 F/O or a L-1011 F/O also current as a DC-9 CA. As you might imagine, safety concerns arose, and the program was eventually abandoned.
tomgoodman is offline  
Old 07-02-2013, 06:50 AM
  #3375  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Captain Tony's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,951
Default

Originally Posted by Redundant Guy View Post
Remember the "doom and gloom" guys that come out of the woodwork every time something new is looked at? Said the same thing about PBS. The only thing that slowed the need for pilots was superficial, not internal. In fact most pilots at ASA today like the PBS system far better than the line bidding process.

Probably not much change in number of crews needed with the new 117 rules. The numbers needed to offset the new rules is fairly significant. However, it should mean less reserves because more people can get completed and one reserve can work anywhere in the system they are needed. With the upcoming flushing of the regionals, reserve should be be fairly short. It will be even shorter for the CRJ side than ERJ with this.
Is that why the company recently asked the union to increase reserve staffing? Hate to be one of those doom and gloom guys, but experience with this company is my guide. They are totally unprepared for the new work rules, are hoping for dual qual as a band aid, and will grossly increase reserves either way to cover for scheduling's incompetence and inability to comply with the new rules.
Captain Tony is offline  
Old 07-02-2013, 08:00 AM
  #3376  
Gets Weekends Off
 
afterburn81's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: A320
Posts: 1,308
Default

Originally Posted by Captain Tony View Post
Is that why the company recently asked the union to increase reserve staffing? Hate to be one of those doom and gloom guys, but experience with this company is my guide. They are totally unprepared for the new work rules, are hoping for dual qual as a band aid, and will grossly increase reserves either way to cover for scheduling's incompetence and inability to comply with the new rules.

It's true. They are barely hanging on with the minimal rules we currently have. Scheduling people for 17hour days and 4 hour overnights. It's happened to me. If the company is having trouble with the current crap rules I feel the transition to the very restrictive new rules will be a Sh*$ Show at the very least.

It's a HUGE difference. Not so much for the majors and legacies. But for the regional carriers, being able to abuse and bank on a certain percentage of the crewmembers not even knowing their own legalities and regulations is their bread and butter.

I see a lot of fines and lost revenue coming.
afterburn81 is offline  
Old 07-02-2013, 10:38 AM
  #3377  
Gets Weekends Off
 
AnchorDown's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2013
Position: Left Seat
Posts: 239
Default

According to latest "what's goin on in July", 1 CRJ and 2 ERJ classes every month for rest of 2013.

AnchorDown
AnchorDown is offline  
Old 07-02-2013, 11:25 AM
  #3378  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,219
Default

Any word on classes at the beginning of 2014? I'm expecting to have ATP mins right around the New Year.
coryk is offline  
Old 07-02-2013, 11:33 AM
  #3379  
Gets Weekends Off
 
AnchorDown's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2013
Position: Left Seat
Posts: 239
Default

Originally Posted by coryk View Post
Any word on classes at the beginning of 2014? I'm expecting to have ATP mins right around the New Year.
They didn't specify in the blurb that's available to all XJT employees. I'm sure they'll worry about that as the Fall approaches and a number of hurdles are behind them (JCBA being the big one), block hours and attrition.

AnchorDown
AnchorDown is offline  
Old 07-02-2013, 03:39 PM
  #3380  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: PNF
Posts: 622
Default

Originally Posted by Captain Tony View Post
Is that why the company recently asked the union to increase reserve staffing? Hate to be one of those doom and gloom guys, but experience with this company is my guide. They are totally unprepared for the new work rules, are hoping for dual qual as a band aid, and will grossly increase reserves either way to cover for scheduling's incompetence and inability to comply with the new rules.
Unless they improve the QOL of reserves drastically, there is no way people will vote to increase reserves. I hope the union follows the same opinion.
yimke is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
12579
Career Questions
44
12-02-2015 11:46 AM
aircraftdriver
Major
15
03-07-2008 09:59 AM
threegreen
Regional
22
02-22-2008 05:33 PM
worldliner777
Major
13
02-22-2008 07:11 AM
skywarrior
Regional
3
11-02-2005 01:16 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices