What's the Latest at ASA/Expressjet?
#6711
Banned
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Quote:
Originally Posted by motormadness
I believe these are simply aircraft that were being parked this year regardless. The article also states: "The company said it is grounding the planes because of high fuel prices, larger replacement jets and pilot shortages and could ground its nine remaining Embraer ERJ 135 planes in the fourth quarter."
United can say anything they want to save face but it's no secret INC is under a lot of pressure to cut Expressjet's money loosing cpa's they negotiated. Correct me if I'm wrong but I believe INC has made it known (threatened) that they plan to park 145's early (100 of them)?
Originally Posted by motormadness
I believe these are simply aircraft that were being parked this year regardless. The article also states: "The company said it is grounding the planes because of high fuel prices, larger replacement jets and pilot shortages and could ground its nine remaining Embraer ERJ 135 planes in the fourth quarter."
United can say anything they want to save face but it's no secret INC is under a lot of pressure to cut Expressjet's money loosing cpa's they negotiated. Correct me if I'm wrong but I believe INC has made it known (threatened) that they plan to park 145's early (100 of them)?
#6712
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 200
Likes: 0
From: Ablue320
Anyone else here the latest on Big D wanting all DCI flying wholly owned by the end of 2015? Pressing INC hard to cut LXJT and sell back ASA...
#6713
Banned
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
If they want to buy ASA to keep all DCI flying wholly owned, then why would they care what Skywest does with LXJT? That doesn't make sense whatsoever.
#6714
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
United can say anything they want to save face but it's no secret INC is under a lot of pressure to cut Expressjet's money loosing cpa's they negotiated. Correct me if I'm wrong but I believe INC has made it known (threatened) that they plan to park 145's early (100 of them)?
Over 100 come off contract by March 2015....
#6715
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
From: emb-145 ca
Inc cannot unilaterally park ERJs early. Each aircraft has a specific time line of when they are no longer under the CPA between Skywest and United. Of course they could mutually agree to something. But it's not going to be at the cost of Skywest continuing to operate them at a loss. Eventually ALL ERJs WILL be parked, regardless.
#6716
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
That would be a pretty large undertaking.. they would have to shift all the flying currently done by CP, S5, G7, RP, and OO to just EV and 9E... that's just not gonna happen.
#6717
Banned
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevets
Inc cannot unilaterally park ERJs early. Each aircraft has a specific time line of when they are no longer under the CPA between Skywest and United. Of course they could mutually agree to something. But it's not going to be at the cost of Skywest continuing to operate them at a loss. Eventually ALL ERJs WILL be parked, regardless.
Eventually ALL 787s WILL be parked too. What's your point?
Originally Posted by Nevets
Inc cannot unilaterally park ERJs early. Each aircraft has a specific time line of when they are no longer under the CPA between Skywest and United. Of course they could mutually agree to something. But it's not going to be at the cost of Skywest continuing to operate them at a loss. Eventually ALL ERJs WILL be parked, regardless.
Eventually ALL 787s WILL be parked too. What's your point?
#6719
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,301
Likes: 2
Not to mention SkyWest owns some gates in ATL.. (20 i think).... Thats a huge leverage..
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




