What's the Latest at ASA/Expressjet?
#7642
Banned
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Correction: The only reason we are discussing this is because the ERJ side walked into June negotiations without authorization to move off their opener, and insisted instead, to negotiate SmartPref PBS work rules, which completely undermine the current ASA PBS system and work rules, without the ASA MEC's presence.
Ok, so lets say they do, would that be good enough for you? I'm looking for your specific opinion on it. To me, it seems like a very reasonable compromise, especially in order to get a JCBA done sooner rather than later.
Correction: This is so far out the realm of reality, I don't even know where to start. The issue of which PBS to use isn't what's in the already scheduled arbitration. Nothing in the JCBA can be determined by an arbitrator, as laid out in the TPA. What can be arbitrated are TPA and PPA disputes. An arbitrator can not and will not be asked to force one side or another into a PBS system. Is that REALLY what your reps are telling you???
I'm looking forward to this finally being put to bed. But somehow I don't believe it will be put to bed if the arbitrator rules in favor of the pbs process agreement. Am I right?
Actually, SmartPref is not capable of generating lines of "pure" CDOs. in other words, any pilot, whether they want CDOs or not, could get a line with a mix of day trips and CDOs. No pilot could get a line of just CDOs. It is a problem in the algorithm, and Crewing Solutions can't seem to make it work.
I just qualified that statement because its what I thought I heard the scheduling committee chairman say. I could've easily misinterpreted.
My whole point in this is that both MECs are just doing what they feel is best for their respective pilot groups, as they should. So everyone needs to stop taking it personal when an mec does something that does not agree with the other side! There is a process in place to get this all resolved in due time. So lets see what happens. If fit starts to hit the shan, well, its the erj side who is going to take the brunt of it anyway, at least thats what is insinuated here over and over again. So whats the problem? We voted no by 83% knowing that they were going to do to the erj side what they are currently doing. So this shouldn't be a surprise to anyone.
#7643
#7644
Banned
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Yes! I can see how that came out the wrong way. Management told us all that we would have a stagnant fleet plan until we have a jcba. On the erj side, we've known that the schedule of lease expiration and subsequent parking of the aircraft was already past due. This wasn't a secret. Personally, I think most of us knew that our aircraft were going to be parked regardless.
#7645
Line Holder
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Looks like a E145 cabin trainer is going into Flight Safety in ATL. I hear a 145 sim is going in as well. Getting it pulled out of IAH and sent to ATL. What gives with that? CRJ pilots flying ERJ's now?
#7647
Banned
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Did you call Capt. Tony yet? He can explain it you. Let us know what you think after you talk to him.
#7648
Banned
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
I know they've been talking about selling one of the sims for years. Makes sense now since the fleet is shrinking. Eventually it won't make sense to continue leasing the training center in IAH from UAL anymore and all the sims will be sold. Training will be done through FSI just as the ASA pilots do now.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




