Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > Retired Regionals > ExpressJet
What's the Latest at ASA/Expressjet? >

What's the Latest at ASA/Expressjet?

Search

Notices
ExpressJet Regional Airline

What's the Latest at ASA/Expressjet?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-02-2014 | 06:04 AM
  #7641  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
From: The right seat
Default

Originally Posted by gojo
How many pages of this thread are about PBS?
Dunno. Why you askin me?
Old 10-02-2014 | 07:53 AM
  #7642  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Default

Originally Posted by Captain Tony
Correction: The only reason we are discussing this is because the ERJ side walked into June negotiations without authorization to move off their opener, and insisted instead, to negotiate SmartPref PBS work rules, which completely undermine the current ASA PBS system and work rules, without the ASA MEC's presence.
How can it undermine flight line when the work rules for smartpref havent even been negotiated yet? Anyway, what I'm specifically talking about is the pbs process agreement because someone asked specifically why we are still talking about PBS. The two MECs can agree to use any section of the failed ta, including things like alpa dues check off, filling of vacancies, leaves of absence. The ASA MEC decided to NOT agree to the previously agreed upon pbs process agreement. Thats the reason why we are still talking about pbs. Thats different than not having another TA yet.

Originally Posted by Captain Tony
Correction: The ERJ MEC proposed it, the ASA MEC considered it, the ASA MEC said it "may" be acceptable, then ALPA Legal told both sides it is a violation of the Association Constitutions and Bylaws. Please stop trumpeting this falsehood, Luis.
You know that the two mecs can do whatever they want regardless of attorneys. Attorneys just give opinions. They do NOT have veto power over any MEC. The ONLY entity that has the authority to interpret the by-laws is the EC and NOBODY else. Its just an excuse. If the two parties agree to it, then there is no grieved or harmed party. Who is going to sue who and on what grounds since no one was harmed?


Originally Posted by Captain Tony
Correction: The Company has not agreed to this.
Ok, so lets say they do, would that be good enough for you? I'm looking for your specific opinion on it. To me, it seems like a very reasonable compromise, especially in order to get a JCBA done sooner rather than later.

Originally Posted by Captain Tony
Correction: The ASA pilot group has told their MEC clearly that the dual tracks in the failed TA are not acceptable.
And why is that? Really? What's the big deal? If we can get a JCBA with dual tracks, then whats the problem? They should just grandfather us so that no one has to take a concession!

Originally Posted by Captain Tony
Correction: This is so far out the realm of reality, I don't even know where to start. The issue of which PBS to use isn't what's in the already scheduled arbitration. Nothing in the JCBA can be determined by an arbitrator, as laid out in the TPA. What can be arbitrated are TPA and PPA disputes. An arbitrator can not and will not be asked to force one side or another into a PBS system. Is that REALLY what your reps are telling you???
Maybe I didn't explain it well enough. What I'm trying to say is thats its my belief that if the arbitrator rules against the pbs process agreement, then the only viable choice for the erj mec is to go with flight line since the asa mec isn't willing to consider anything else. But who knows, they may have some other idea.

Originally Posted by Captain Tony
The arbitration takes place in November.
I'm looking forward to this finally being put to bed. But somehow I don't believe it will be put to bed if the arbitrator rules in favor of the pbs process agreement. Am I right?

Originally Posted by Captain Tony
Actually, SmartPref is not capable of generating lines of "pure" CDOs. in other words, any pilot, whether they want CDOs or not, could get a line with a mix of day trips and CDOs. No pilot could get a line of just CDOs. It is a problem in the algorithm, and Crewing Solutions can't seem to make it work.
Ok, I must have misheard what was said. Or maybe they weren't talking about pure CDO lines. But I don't see why anyone couldn't get pure CDO lines if they are senior enough anyway?

Originally Posted by PeezDog
Almost positive doesn't sound convincing to me
I just qualified that statement because its what I thought I heard the scheduling committee chairman say. I could've easily misinterpreted.


My whole point in this is that both MECs are just doing what they feel is best for their respective pilot groups, as they should. So everyone needs to stop taking it personal when an mec does something that does not agree with the other side! There is a process in place to get this all resolved in due time. So lets see what happens. If fit starts to hit the shan, well, its the erj side who is going to take the brunt of it anyway, at least thats what is insinuated here over and over again. So whats the problem? We voted no by 83% knowing that they were going to do to the erj side what they are currently doing. So this shouldn't be a surprise to anyone.
Old 10-02-2014 | 08:13 AM
  #7643  
ross9238's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
From: Grounded
Default

Originally Posted by Nevets
We voted no by 83% knowing that they were going to do to the erj side what they are currently doing. So this shouldn't be a surprise to anyone.
I don't want to read this the wrong way so just want to make sure that when you mean "We" you are referring to both the ASA and XJT pilot group, right?
Old 10-02-2014 | 08:23 AM
  #7644  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Default

Originally Posted by ross9238
I don't want to read this the wrong way so just want to make sure that when you mean "We" you are referring to both the ASA and XJT pilot group, right?
Yes! I can see how that came out the wrong way. Management told us all that we would have a stagnant fleet plan until we have a jcba. On the erj side, we've known that the schedule of lease expiration and subsequent parking of the aircraft was already past due. This wasn't a secret. Personally, I think most of us knew that our aircraft were going to be parked regardless.
Old 10-02-2014 | 08:58 AM
  #7645  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Default

Looks like a E145 cabin trainer is going into Flight Safety in ATL. I hear a 145 sim is going in as well. Getting it pulled out of IAH and sent to ATL. What gives with that? CRJ pilots flying ERJ's now?
Old 10-02-2014 | 08:58 AM
  #7646  
PeezDog's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
From: CRJ
Default

Originally Posted by gojo
How many pages of this thread are about PBS?
Countless. This is why I don't get it. They've had 4 years to figure this out and they are still fighting over it. I'm all for looking out for your own pilot group, but this is ridiculous now.
Old 10-02-2014 | 09:08 AM
  #7647  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by PeezDog
Countless. This is why I don't get it. They've had 4 years to figure this out and they are still fighting over it. I'm all for looking out for your own pilot group, but this is ridiculous now.
Did you call Capt. Tony yet? He can explain it you. Let us know what you think after you talk to him.
Old 10-02-2014 | 09:36 AM
  #7648  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Default What's the Latest at ASA/Expressjet?

Originally Posted by Redundant Guy
Looks like a E145 cabin trainer is going into Flight Safety in ATL. I hear a 145 sim is going in as well. Getting it pulled out of IAH and sent to ATL. What gives with that? CRJ pilots flying ERJ's now?

I know they've been talking about selling one of the sims for years. Makes sense now since the fleet is shrinking. Eventually it won't make sense to continue leasing the training center in IAH from UAL anymore and all the sims will be sold. Training will be done through FSI just as the ASA pilots do now.
Old 10-02-2014 | 10:35 AM
  #7649  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 503
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Redundant Guy
Looks like a E145 cabin trainer is going into Flight Safety in ATL. I hear a 145 sim is going in as well. Getting it pulled out of IAH and sent to ATL. What gives with that? CRJ pilots flying ERJ's now?

Also pulling the 700 for 2 new 900 sims.
Old 10-02-2014 | 11:12 AM
  #7650  
somertime32's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
From: I can fly.....I'm a pilot
Default

Originally Posted by Redundant Guy
Looks like a E145 cabin trainer is going into Flight Safety in ATL. I hear a 145 sim is going in as well. Getting it pulled out of IAH and sent to ATL. What gives with that? CRJ pilots flying ERJ's now?

Also pulling the 700 for 2 new 900 sims.
Schoolhouse rumor?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
12579
Career Questions
44
12-02-2015 11:46 AM
aircraftdriver
Major
15
03-07-2008 09:59 AM
threegreen
Regional
22
02-22-2008 05:33 PM
worldliner777
Major
13
02-22-2008 07:11 AM
skywarrior
Regional
3
11-02-2005 01:16 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices