What's the Latest at ASA/Expressjet?
08-09-2012 | 09:00 PM
#771
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 5
From: 737 Left
I was surprised it came out early. I expected a crew message at the last minute apologizing for it being late.
08-10-2012 | 07:20 AM
#772
Line Holder
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,412
Likes: 12
From: A320
The one and only time I had to urgently take the controls from another pilot other than back in flight instructing. Come to think of it I felt like an instructor all over again. Her personality has gotten better but the flying skills......wow!
08-10-2012 | 07:21 AM
#773
Line Holder
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,412
Likes: 12
From: A320
If you're gonna tell a story, AT LEAST tell a complete story.
If the JCBA is in ANY form concessionary, then YES, let it drag out as long as possible.
If the SLI is in ANY form unfair to EITHER pilot group, they YES, let it drag out as long as possible.
Don't just take the word of the usual suspects like Tony, JoeMerchant, Southerner, or whom ever else THINKS they have a good handle on what the L-XJT wants out of this whole thing.
You know, the senior "I got mine so screw everybody else" crowd
If the JCBA is in ANY form concessionary, then YES, let it drag out as long as possible.
If the SLI is in ANY form unfair to EITHER pilot group, they YES, let it drag out as long as possible.
Don't just take the word of the usual suspects like Tony, JoeMerchant, Southerner, or whom ever else THINKS they have a good handle on what the L-XJT wants out of this whole thing.
You know, the senior "I got mine so screw everybody else" crowd
Good post man!
08-10-2012 | 08:02 AM
#774
Banned
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Forget the exact number but staffing was heavy for a period of time there.
This is just my take on it and I could be wrong. If that rumor about United kickin 145's to the curb and bringin in bigger CRJ's is true that will be pretty sick! Hopefully it is true. Get some movement and get the L-Xjet of their high horse. I know that's immature but they are annoying.
08-10-2012 | 08:05 AM
#775
Underpaid...
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,101
Likes: 0
From: French-Canadian
And you do realize that United SCOPE is unlimited 70 seaters and they still have you guys fly ERJs around, are they waiting to stack up on CRJ 900 or E175 is the question. Just because you have replacement rights don't mean a thing, your company will have to play ball if they wish to continue business past your current contract with United!
08-10-2012 | 09:20 AM
#776
Line Holder
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,044
Likes: 2
Reading B.3 and B.4 of the TPA, I think it depends on what form the flying takes (an extension of a current CPA or a new CPA) -- Could mgmt. agree to cancel their current CPA with United and sign a new one to fly 70s and place them wherever they wanted? (Not scaremongering, just trying to understand the contract language).
08-10-2012 | 03:10 PM
#778
Line Holder
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
And you do realize that United SCOPE is unlimited 70 seaters and they still have you guys fly ERJs around, are they waiting to stack up on CRJ 900 or E175 is the question. Just because you have replacement rights don't mean a thing, your company will have to play ball if they wish to continue business past your current contract with United!
08-10-2012 | 04:46 PM
#779
Banned
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
And you do realize that United SCOPE is unlimited 70 seaters and they still have you guys fly ERJs around, are they waiting to stack up on CRJ 900 or E175 is the question. Just because you have replacement rights don't mean a thing, your company will have to play ball if they wish to continue business past your current contract with United!
Reading B.3 and B.4 of the TPA, I think it depends on what form the flying takes (an extension of a current CPA or a new CPA) -- Could mgmt. agree to cancel their current CPA with United and sign a new one to fly 70s and place them wherever they wanted? (Not scaremongering, just trying to understand the contract language).
No, but the entity they made that agreement with, with clear intent and in good faith might.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
