Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > Retired Regionals > ExpressJet
What's the Latest at ASA/Expressjet? >

What's the Latest at ASA/Expressjet?

Search

Notices
ExpressJet Regional Airline

What's the Latest at ASA/Expressjet?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-12-2012 | 07:05 PM
  #801  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by xjtguy
Don't just take the word of the usual suspects like Tony, JoeMerchant, Southerner, or whom ever else THINKS they have a good handle on what the L-XJT wants out of this whole thing.
Don't throw me into the mix with those two. I may not say things that you agree with, but I do want a JCBA and SLI that we can all agree to. I haven't formed any opinions of ERJ guys from online. All of my opinions come from those that I know in the "real world." For the most part, they are good people, with a slightly distorted view of the reality of the XJT purchase, and lack of experience with the SkyWest Inc management.

That combination has led them to believe that if they just hold their breath and stomp like a child in WalMart, management will cave in and give them whatever pay rates they want if they will only just start breathing again. Unfortunately, that isn't the case.

In my posts, I've tried to impart some of my experience since the SkyWest purchase of ASA with the SkyWest management. I'm looking out for your best interests, because if you dig in and vote no to a contract that is reasonable, SkyWest management will punish you for it. I'm just a line pilot, but that's my take on this whole deal. I don't want the CRJ side to grow at the expense of the ERJ side, but I would bet my regional jet paycheck that it will happen if they determine you aren't reasonable people to work with.

I'm not a regional "lifer," and I'm not willing to vote yes on just anything or any rate that comes along. I think there are several sections of the contract that need significant improvement, for the CRJ side at least. I'm willing to vote no for a contract that isn't reasonable.
Old 08-12-2012 | 07:59 PM
  #802  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 929
Likes: 0
From: e190
Default

Originally Posted by Southerner
Don't throw me into the mix with those two. I may not say things that you agree with, but I do want a JCBA and SLI that we can all agree to. I haven't formed any opinions of ERJ guys from online. All of my opinions come from those that I know in the "real world." For the most part, they are good people, with a slightly distorted view of the reality of the XJT purchase, and lack of experience with the SkyWest Inc management.

That combination has led them to believe that if they just hold their breath and stomp like a child in WalMart, management will cave in and give them whatever pay rates they want if they will only just start breathing again. Unfortunately, that isn't the case.

In my posts, I've tried to impart some of my experience since the SkyWest purchase of ASA with the SkyWest management. I'm looking out for your best interests, because if you dig in and vote no to a contract that is reasonable, SkyWest management will punish you for it. I'm just a line pilot, but that's my take on this whole deal. I don't want the CRJ side to grow at the expense of the ERJ side, but I would bet my regional jet paycheck that it will happen if they determine you aren't reasonable people to work with.

I'm not a regional "lifer," and I'm not willing to vote yes on just anything or any rate that comes along. I think there are several sections of the contract that need significant improvement, for the CRJ side at least. I'm willing to vote no for a contract that isn't reasonable.
This is the brainwashing coming out of the ASA mec that is perfectly willing to give away whatever negotiating leverage they have. The company can and will make money off of us and management will be compensated well for their time. Why are we the ones fighting for pennies and being abused by poor contract language? Pay rates mean nothing if the work rules aren't there and this negotiation is a two way street. Your mentality of play ball or we upset mom is exactly why the pilot whipshaw continues. No backbone or knowledge of how to negotiate.
Old 08-12-2012 | 10:08 PM
  #803  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 145
Likes: 23
From: Bus Driver
Default

Originally Posted by newarkblows
This is the brainwashing coming out of the ASA mec that is perfectly willing to give away whatever negotiating leverage they have. The company can and will make money off of us and management will be compensated well for their time. Why are we the ones fighting for pennies and being abused by poor contract language? Pay rates mean nothing if the work rules aren't there and this negotiation is a two way street. Your mentality of play ball or we upset mom is exactly why the pilot whipshaw continues. No backbone or knowledge of how to negotiate.
Wow, no knowledge of how to negotiate? So I take it you have been to every negotiating meeting , that you have a long list of actions that the mec has blundered. ASA's mec negotiated one of the better contracts in 07, a contract that most regional pilots would happily trade for. And here's the greatest irony of it all, mainline continental essentialy negotiated your last contract, not to mention the fact that it was negotiated with the parent company of the flying you were performing. it's a different game now , ask the Airtran pilots how playing "hardball" worked out.
Old 08-13-2012 | 06:26 AM
  #804  
Leroy Smith's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ysslah
65 hours of min line credit I think.
Thank you.

Originally Posted by Vertisch
Minus the 28 you get from vacation so you need to find 37 hours from pairings.
Thank you.

Originally Posted by Hoser
If you want an excellent PBS guide get ahold of Russ Vaugh's Q&A guide. It's on the ALPA web board under PBS.

Hoser
And thank you. I havent seen him in a while to pick his brain about this stuff.
Old 08-13-2012 | 06:30 AM
  #805  
Leroy Smith's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by skigambia
it's a different game now.
Quoted for truthiness. The problems are not with the CBAs. They are being negotiated well for the most part. The moving of the cheese is what is really fracking things up. Its the unknown unknowns.....
Old 08-13-2012 | 06:49 AM
  #806  
Vertisch's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
From: Catching breathe
Default

Originally Posted by Leroy Smith
Thank you.



Thank you.



And thank you. I havent seen him in a while to pick his brain about this stuff.
I think he transfered to Detroit.
Old 08-13-2012 | 10:15 AM
  #807  
Gets Weekends Off
20 Years
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,047
Likes: 20
From: 7ER B...whatever that means.
Default

This has been stewing and simmering and bothering me over the last few years, and this isn't just an ASA/XJT thing but: somehow, somewhere along the line management was able to brainwash every airline employee in America into thinking that their paycheck was the difference between a profit and a loss; the difference between a sustainable operation and a catastrophic shutdown. Now, while that was going on, management pay and benefits, especially at the upper echelons, has skyrocketed to many many many times what your average rank and file employee takes home. And what does that premium get you? Destructive mergers and revolving-door bankruptcies. My issues with this are twofold:

1.) One only has to look at Southwest, FedEx, Delta and any of the large, established foreign carriers to see that this is total BS. Your paycheck is NOT the difference between a profit and and loss.

2.) IF employee compensation is part of the problem, lets take a top-down approach. Cutting pay 2-6% from the top is like cutting pay 50-60% at the bottom. So rather than coming after my pay and benefits with a cleaver, why not go after those at the top with a paring knife?

Now, I think the blame rests squarely in OUR laps for allowing this group-think to fester and perpetuate itself in this industry since deregulation. Fool us once, shame on you. Fool us for 40 years, well... The reality is that truly sustainable profitability can only be had from organizational efficiencies. Again, look at the most consistently profitable companies both inside this industry and out. They aren't profitable because they pay their people chump change. They are profitable because they are EFFICIENT. Without getting specific, I think we can all agree that current tactics used by managements do nothing to foster willingness among employees to operate efficiently. So what I say to management is this: Only through efficiency is there profitability. Motivate me to be efficient. The first step towards that end is to keep your grubby mitts off my meager paycheck! What I would say to employees is this: Only when we stop being the low-hanging fruit will the cycle be broken.

Last edited by freezingflyboy; 08-13-2012 at 10:34 AM.
Old 08-13-2012 | 10:55 AM
  #808  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by freezingflyboy
This has been stewing and simmering and bothering me over the last few years, and this isn't just an ASA/XJT thing but: somehow, somewhere along the line management was able to brainwash every airline employee in America into thinking that their paycheck was the difference between a profit and a loss; the difference between a sustainable operation and a catastrophic shutdown. Now, while that was going on, management pay and benefits, especially at the upper echelons, has skyrocketed to many many many times what your average rank and file employee takes home. And what does that premium get you? Destructive mergers and revolving-door bankruptcies. My issues with this are twofold:

1.) One only has to look at Southwest, FedEx, Delta and any of the large, established foreign carriers to see that this is total BS. Your paycheck is NOT the difference between a profit and and loss.

2.) IF employee compensation is part of the problem, lets take a top-down approach. Cutting pay 2-6% from the top is like cutting pay 50-60% at the bottom. So rather than coming after my pay and benefits with a cleaver, why not go after those at the top with a paring knife?

Now, I think the blame rests squarely in OUR laps for allowing this group-think to fester and perpetuate itself in this industry since deregulation. Fool us once, shame on you. Fool us for 40 years, well... The reality is that truly sustainable profitability can only be had from organizational efficiencies. Again, look at the most consistently profitable companies both inside this industry and out. They aren't profitable because they pay their people chump change. They are profitable because they are EFFICIENT. Without getting specific, I think we can all agree that current tactics used by managements do nothing to foster willingness among employees to operate efficiently. So what I say to management is this: Only through efficiency is there profitability. Motivate me to be efficient. The first step towards that end is to keep your grubby mitts off my meager paycheck! What I would say to employees is this: Only when we stop being the low-hanging fruit will the cycle be broken.
I nominate this for Post of the Century... Could not agree more, I'm tempted to copy and paste this to every thread that even hints that we ask for too much as pilots.
Old 08-13-2012 | 11:06 AM
  #809  
Red97Vette's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
From: UniCal 737 FO
Default

Originally Posted by MaxPowerSet
I nominate this for Post of the Century... Could not agree more, I'm tempted to copy and paste this to every thread that even hints that we ask for too much as pilots.
Very well said!
Old 08-13-2012 | 11:09 AM
  #810  
Red97Vette's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
From: UniCal 737 FO
Default

Originally Posted by newarkblows
This is the brainwashing coming out of the ASA mec that is perfectly willing to give away whatever negotiating leverage they have. The company can and will make money off of us and management will be compensated well for their time. Why are we the ones fighting for pennies and being abused by poor contract language? Pay rates mean nothing if the work rules aren't there and this negotiation is a two way street. Your mentality of play ball or we upset mom is exactly why the pilot whipshaw continues. No backbone or knowledge of how to negotiate.
Sounds like you are upset management is making money from its hard working employees? It also sounds like any money that is made should be going into your check because you "deserve" it? Ever wonder why companies exist? (hint: it's not to maximize your paycheck and not turn profits). Sounds like you need a reality check or go find a government job.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
12579
Career Questions
44
12-02-2015 11:46 AM
aircraftdriver
Major
15
03-07-2008 09:59 AM
threegreen
Regional
22
02-22-2008 05:33 PM
worldliner777
Major
13
02-22-2008 07:11 AM
skywarrior
Regional
3
11-02-2005 01:16 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices