What's the Latest at ASA/Expressjet?
#8171
My 2 cents: At this point if we ever want a JCBA I don't see what's wrong with having different pay rates, QOL items and bidding systems whether you fly an ERJ or a CRJ. Then you can choose not to bid from erj to crj etc.
The well has been so poisoned by now that the ERJ side will never accept any loss of retirement, LTD coverage etc to "help out" the ASA side to improve the overall contract like the TA proposed.
Attrition is so high that hiring and upgrades are starting up again. It's time to agree to disagree and move on, otherwise we stay as we are, I think most ERJ guys are comfortable with that.
The well has been so poisoned by now that the ERJ side will never accept any loss of retirement, LTD coverage etc to "help out" the ASA side to improve the overall contract like the TA proposed.
Attrition is so high that hiring and upgrades are starting up again. It's time to agree to disagree and move on, otherwise we stay as we are, I think most ERJ guys are comfortable with that.
This has just turned into a d*** measuring contest between the MEC's.
#8172
I'll agree that we'll agree to disagree lol. If you don't see the problem with having separate contracts in the new contact after its been explained over and over here, then you guys will never understand it. We shall see what is proposed and go from there.
#8174
Banned
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
You tell me you object but done give a reason other than you don't want it or you say that it's obvious.
Nevets,
I believe the reason most of us keep "beating this dead horse" is because we want to pas a reasonable contract that is better for us now, as well as those coming after us. Anything that supports a continued lack of unity, such as separate PBS, is not better for us. Also, we don't want Management to agree to an unrealistic contract now as the beginning point for a bankruptcy filing, which will end up worse for everybody. Also, eliminating certain things in the current contracts and gaining other things in a unified contract is not concession, it is compromise through negotiation. Regardless of the changes if the vast majority of pilots are better compensated and have a better quality of life after the signing of any new contract it isn't concession; it's compromise. Most people here, according to my interpretation of their responses, don't believe you are open to compromise, which is why your argument breaks down. We are not going to get everything good in both existing contracts, so let's figure out the most important things and stand firm there, then make everything else as good as we can get it for now.
I believe the reason most of us keep "beating this dead horse" is because we want to pas a reasonable contract that is better for us now, as well as those coming after us. Anything that supports a continued lack of unity, such as separate PBS, is not better for us. Also, we don't want Management to agree to an unrealistic contract now as the beginning point for a bankruptcy filing, which will end up worse for everybody. Also, eliminating certain things in the current contracts and gaining other things in a unified contract is not concession, it is compromise through negotiation. Regardless of the changes if the vast majority of pilots are better compensated and have a better quality of life after the signing of any new contract it isn't concession; it's compromise. Most people here, according to my interpretation of their responses, don't believe you are open to compromise, which is why your argument breaks down. We are not going to get everything good in both existing contracts, so let's figure out the most important things and stand firm there, then make everything else as good as we can get it for now.
You keep beating this dead horse PBS issue all out of the blue though. This conversation had died a few times on this thread and it's always you guys coming back with your club.
But at least you make your points clear. The problem, as I see it, is that you want a reasonable contract. So do we, but we believe that a reasonable contract doesn't include concessions. We don't believe either pilot group should take concessions. And I wholeheartedly agree that the majority of pilots should be better compensated and better QOL. Wit that in mind and the fact that the majority of pilots operate on the better compensated and QOL contract, then we shouldn't settle for less than what's going to make the majority of pilots pay and QOL better. I don't agree that the majority of pilots should lose pay and or QOL in order to complete the merger because you think we can't do any better. After the TA failed, management said that they are no longer asking for concessions. And just two days ago, they said that the last TA was unrealistic. Now we see that MULTIPLE regionals are offering more money and QOL improvements. The tide is turning in our favor so don't sell us short. Admittedly, I would rather stay separate if the alternatives means concessions.
Also, don't do management's job for them. It's not up to us to tell management to not agree to a contract because we think it's going to cause a bankruptcy. This is another thing we take issue with. It's smells of Stockholm syndrome. Skywest inc pays MILLIONS to F&H to advice them on this. So just stop acting like we need to worry about that already.
Lastly, I honestly don't see disunity in having two separate bidding systems. We already have three separate bidding systems in the erj side and there is no disunity. Also, after integration, pilots will be able to bid to different aircraft regardless. I don't believe that this unity issue is the reason why you are fighting the PBS process agreement.
I'm not talking about separate contracts. I'm talking about neither pilot group having to concede what they currently have while having a process where the erj pilots have the opportunity to try their bidding system while the CRJ side keeps theirs for the duration of the JCBA. Seems simple so what's the problem with that, especially since your MEC had already previously agreed to such an arrangement on bidding systems?
Last edited by Nevets; 11-25-2014 at 01:17 PM.
#8175
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 5
From: 737 Left
Can somebody explain the new contract we got to fly 200's for Delta? I don't understand what Alex means by '3 lines' or '4 lines'. What does that mean as far as aircraft or pilot numbers?
#8176
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
From: crj-200 FO
doesn't mean crap. It's not a new delta contract, it's just us agreeing to cover some more crj flying next year. Same stuff we have been doing for years. She just put a spin to it for it to sound like yesterdays announcement for the ERJ guys. if it is a new contract then it's a one year contract, still pretty pointless, one airplane growth of flying for one year.
#8177
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 622
Likes: 0
From: PNF
doesn't mean crap. It's not a new delta contract, it's just us agreeing to cover some more crj flying next year. Same stuff we have been doing for years. She just put a spin to it for it to sound like yesterdays announcement for the ERJ guys. if it is a new contract then it's a one year contract, still pretty pointless, one airplane growth of flying for one year.
#8178
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
A line is one aircraft flown for one full day (6-10 legs in an RJ). One aircraft line flown for a full month typically generates 5 pilot lines per month.
#8180
Line Holder
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
To match the CRJ new hire procedure there will be No more sharing a hotel room for ERJ new hires beginning with the Dec 03rd class in IAH.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




