Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > Retired Regionals > ExpressJet
What's the Latest at ASA/Expressjet? >

What's the Latest at ASA/Expressjet?

Search

Notices
ExpressJet Regional Airline

What's the Latest at ASA/Expressjet?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-25-2014 | 10:26 AM
  #8171  
l1011's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by IrishNJ
My 2 cents: At this point if we ever want a JCBA I don't see what's wrong with having different pay rates, QOL items and bidding systems whether you fly an ERJ or a CRJ. Then you can choose not to bid from erj to crj etc.

The well has been so poisoned by now that the ERJ side will never accept any loss of retirement, LTD coverage etc to "help out" the ASA side to improve the overall contract like the TA proposed.

Attrition is so high that hiring and upgrades are starting up again. It's time to agree to disagree and move on, otherwise we stay as we are, I think most ERJ guys are comfortable with that.
Agreed! I am sick of this BS. I could care less about which PBS we use. I am happy with the contract we have now on the ERJ. If we cant get something better, keep it the way it is.

This has just turned into a d*** measuring contest between the MEC's.
Old 11-25-2014 | 12:15 PM
  #8172  
PeezDog's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
From: CRJ
Default

I'll agree that we'll agree to disagree lol. If you don't see the problem with having separate contracts in the new contact after its been explained over and over here, then you guys will never understand it. We shall see what is proposed and go from there.
Old 11-25-2014 | 12:53 PM
  #8173  
New Hire
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: Lav Cart, driver
Default

I want a divorce.
Old 11-25-2014 | 12:57 PM
  #8174  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 2,934
Likes: 0
From: EMB 145 CPT
Default What's the Latest at ASA/Expressjet?

Originally Posted by PeezDog
Wow Nevets, I'm am speechless and out of patience trying to explain this to you. Now I know how our union guys feel working with you guys. I keep telling you what my objections are to your idea, then you repeat yourself and ask me what's the problem. You're nuts man

You tell me you object but done give a reason other than you don't want it or you say that it's obvious.


Originally Posted by AtlCSIP
Nevets,



I believe the reason most of us keep "beating this dead horse" is because we want to pas a reasonable contract that is better for us now, as well as those coming after us. Anything that supports a continued lack of unity, such as separate PBS, is not better for us. Also, we don't want Management to agree to an unrealistic contract now as the beginning point for a bankruptcy filing, which will end up worse for everybody. Also, eliminating certain things in the current contracts and gaining other things in a unified contract is not concession, it is compromise through negotiation. Regardless of the changes if the vast majority of pilots are better compensated and have a better quality of life after the signing of any new contract it isn't concession; it's compromise. Most people here, according to my interpretation of their responses, don't believe you are open to compromise, which is why your argument breaks down. We are not going to get everything good in both existing contracts, so let's figure out the most important things and stand firm there, then make everything else as good as we can get it for now.

You keep beating this dead horse PBS issue all out of the blue though. This conversation had died a few times on this thread and it's always you guys coming back with your club.

But at least you make your points clear. The problem, as I see it, is that you want a reasonable contract. So do we, but we believe that a reasonable contract doesn't include concessions. We don't believe either pilot group should take concessions. And I wholeheartedly agree that the majority of pilots should be better compensated and better QOL. Wit that in mind and the fact that the majority of pilots operate on the better compensated and QOL contract, then we shouldn't settle for less than what's going to make the majority of pilots pay and QOL better. I don't agree that the majority of pilots should lose pay and or QOL in order to complete the merger because you think we can't do any better. After the TA failed, management said that they are no longer asking for concessions. And just two days ago, they said that the last TA was unrealistic. Now we see that MULTIPLE regionals are offering more money and QOL improvements. The tide is turning in our favor so don't sell us short. Admittedly, I would rather stay separate if the alternatives means concessions.

Also, don't do management's job for them. It's not up to us to tell management to not agree to a contract because we think it's going to cause a bankruptcy. This is another thing we take issue with. It's smells of Stockholm syndrome. Skywest inc pays MILLIONS to F&H to advice them on this. So just stop acting like we need to worry about that already.

Lastly, I honestly don't see disunity in having two separate bidding systems. We already have three separate bidding systems in the erj side and there is no disunity. Also, after integration, pilots will be able to bid to different aircraft regardless. I don't believe that this unity issue is the reason why you are fighting the PBS process agreement.

Originally Posted by PeezDog
I'll agree that we'll agree to disagree lol. If you don't see the problem with having separate contracts in the new contact after its been explained over and over here, then you guys will never understand it. We shall see what is proposed and go from there.

I'm not talking about separate contracts. I'm talking about neither pilot group having to concede what they currently have while having a process where the erj pilots have the opportunity to try their bidding system while the CRJ side keeps theirs for the duration of the JCBA. Seems simple so what's the problem with that, especially since your MEC had already previously agreed to such an arrangement on bidding systems?

Last edited by Nevets; 11-25-2014 at 01:17 PM.
Old 11-25-2014 | 06:46 PM
  #8175  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 5
From: 737 Left
Default New flying for Delta

Can somebody explain the new contract we got to fly 200's for Delta? I don't understand what Alex means by '3 lines' or '4 lines'. What does that mean as far as aircraft or pilot numbers?
Old 11-25-2014 | 09:11 PM
  #8176  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 479
Likes: 0
From: crj-200 FO
Default

Originally Posted by AtlCSIP
Can somebody explain the new contract we got to fly 200's for Delta? I don't understand what Alex means by '3 lines' or '4 lines'. What does that mean as far as aircraft or pilot numbers?
doesn't mean crap. It's not a new delta contract, it's just us agreeing to cover some more crj flying next year. Same stuff we have been doing for years. She just put a spin to it for it to sound like yesterdays announcement for the ERJ guys. if it is a new contract then it's a one year contract, still pretty pointless, one airplane growth of flying for one year.
Old 11-26-2014 | 02:14 AM
  #8177  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 622
Likes: 0
From: PNF
Default

Originally Posted by USMC3197
doesn't mean crap. It's not a new delta contract, it's just us agreeing to cover some more crj flying next year. Same stuff we have been doing for years. She just put a spin to it for it to sound like yesterdays announcement for the ERJ guys. if it is a new contract then it's a one year contract, still pretty pointless, one airplane growth of flying for one year.
Although it is a spin of information, it's still better than the information conveyed by BH. When we got an additional 2k block hours from endeavour, there was little said. No positive attitude, just collect the 400k paycheck and stock incentives and let the company run it's course. It's sad I first found it out from the union when we started bidding. They are not the messengers on flight operations.
Old 11-26-2014 | 04:57 AM
  #8178  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by AtlCSIP
Can somebody explain the new contract we got to fly 200's for Delta? I don't understand what Alex means by '3 lines' or '4 lines'. What does that mean as far as aircraft or pilot numbers?
A line is one aircraft flown for one full day (6-10 legs in an RJ). One aircraft line flown for a full month typically generates 5 pilot lines per month.
Old 11-26-2014 | 05:12 AM
  #8179  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 5
From: 737 Left
Default

Originally Posted by ASAnotASAP
A line is one aircraft flown for one full day (6-10 legs in an RJ). One aircraft line flown for a full month typically generates 5 pilot lines per month.
Thank you.
Old 11-26-2014 | 07:32 AM
  #8180  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Default

To match the CRJ new hire procedure there will be No more sharing a hotel room for ERJ new hires beginning with the Dec 03rd class in IAH.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
12579
Career Questions
44
12-02-2015 11:46 AM
aircraftdriver
Major
15
03-07-2008 09:59 AM
threegreen
Regional
22
02-22-2008 05:33 PM
worldliner777
Major
13
02-22-2008 07:11 AM
skywarrior
Regional
3
11-02-2005 01:16 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices