Search

Notices

Wolf Pack

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-24-2024, 07:29 AM
  #91  
Aspiring PSA Captain
 
Merle Haggard's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2020
Posts: 840
Default

Originally Posted by Stan446
Lots of things have changed, USPS contract gone. But I'll keep saying this, plenty of pilots worked extra during negotiations and here we are. For some reason our pilot group thinks helping the company during a boom period helps the pilots trying to get a contract. So day flying disapperaing in October. New bid in the fall, guess what, dump and flush. Lots of junior guys getting realainged with where they should be, 75 FO. But hey, they majors are hiring, or are they? TA1 is going to be a dream you wish you could have now. And Josie is your worst enemy. This guy is in it for himself.
This is moron logic. The compensation portions of our contract with a profitable company haven't got a damn thing to do with their decisions about routes, schedules, number of flights, number of airplanes, etc.

Get that out of your tiny head. The company will/would/does manage those things the same way regardless of our contract. The only exception to that is scope. See what's happening here? The only issue that has anything to do with your premise was one of, if not the biggest problem with TA1. SCOPE is the only contract area that can have a material effect on staffing and it was completely lacking in TA1. You are arguing with yourself and don't even know it.

The rest of the contract is not at all connected to the company's pilot needs. Our contract DOES NOT DRIVE THOSE DECISIONS!!!
Merle Haggard is offline  
Old 05-24-2024, 08:11 AM
  #92  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Nov 2023
Posts: 84
Default

Originally Posted by Huck
Your ignorance has cost me $78,236 so far. Destined to be far more.
That money was never yours. But if you want to talk about who cost you TA1, look squarely at the MEC/NC who brought it to you. The MEC/NC and yes voters were hoping to get a decent bump in pension at ANY cost. Which included industry and inflation lagging pay, laughable APRP, QOL gives, weak(er) scope, etc. If TA1 had been ANYWHERE close to fair to any pilots remaining for the NEXT round of negotiations, it would have passed. Instead you/they tried to make up for 20 years of failed attempts to raise the pension on the backs of your fellow pilots.
FedUpWilson318 is offline  
Old 05-24-2024, 08:45 AM
  #93  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Anthrax's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Posts: 635
Default

Originally Posted by FedUpWilson318
That money was never yours. But if you want to talk about who cost you TA1, look squarely at the MEC/NC who brought it to you. The MEC/NC and yes voters were hoping to get a decent bump in pension at ANY cost. Which included industry and inflation lagging pay, laughable APRP, QOL gives, weak(er) scope, etc. If TA1 had been ANYWHERE close to fair to any pilots remaining for the NEXT round of negotiations, it would have passed. Instead you/they tried to make up for 20 years of failed attempts to raise the pension on the backs of your fellow pilots.
The most pressing matter concerning the TA had to do with a member of the previous NC retiring. The company used this to their advantage, and the NC pushed a laughable TA onto the membership so that this dude could get a bump in retirement. Had the NC taken a pass on the company’s last proposal, the dates set forth for further negotiations would have been past his retirement date, hence no bump. ultimately, he never got that bump, and the NC got flushed.

and yet guys like Stan still want to blame the NO voters, when blame rests solely with the previous NC. When you see these dudes at AOC, thank them.

The previous NC agreed on one too many concessions. And while they should have agreed on none, the TA would have ratified with little if any change in scope.

Greed.
the company, the previous NC, and Stan.

and Rock, yes, it’s true, I am reliable, stale and stagnant, just like your mom.

peace.
Anthrax is offline  
Old 05-24-2024, 09:00 AM
  #94  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sluggo_63's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Posts: 1,275
Default

Originally Posted by Anthrax
The most pressing matter concerning the TA had to do with a member of the previous NC retiring. The company used this to their advantage, and the NC pushed a laughable TA onto the membership so that this dude could get a bump in retirement. Had the NC taken a pass on the company’s last proposal, the dates set forth for further negotiations would have been past his retirement date, hence no bump.
Isn’t JG older than PM is? Like, isn’t JG 63+?
Sluggo_63 is offline  
Old 05-24-2024, 09:05 AM
  #95  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Anthrax's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Posts: 635
Default

Originally Posted by Sluggo_63
Isn’t JG older than PM is? Like, isn’t JG 63+?
I’m not talking about PM.
Anthrax is offline  
Old 05-24-2024, 09:15 AM
  #96  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sluggo_63's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Posts: 1,275
Default

Originally Posted by Anthrax
I’m not talking about PM.
I know you weren’t. But you were intimating that NC members close to retirement will negotiate a CBA that is overly beneficial to their own retirement. So, we got a crappy TA because a NC member (PW) was close to retirement and that was a problem. But there’s no problem now with the chairman of the NC being as close (or closer) to retirement than PW was?
Sluggo_63 is offline  
Old 05-24-2024, 10:22 AM
  #97  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Anthrax's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Posts: 635
Default

Originally Posted by Sluggo_63
I know you weren’t. But you were intimating that NC members close to retirement will negotiate a CBA that is overly beneficial to their own retirement. So, we got a crappy TA because a NC member (PW) was close to retirement and that was a problem. But there’s no problem now with the chairman of the NC being as close (or closer) to retirement than PW was?
I implied no such thing. I don’t believe this is a universal truth. You can infer whatever you like. It became a problem because the previous NC was short sighted and ignorant of the union’s positions, among other things.
Anthrax is offline  
Old 05-25-2024, 06:51 AM
  #98  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 98
Default A plan bump

I regularly encounter admitted 'yes' voters who are fixated on the A plan bump which they would have recieved in TA 1, most of whom have 20+ years on property. It's the sole reason driving their vote, becasue a pension bump has never happened before! It's a miracle! Give praise! They are completely fixated and cannot hear anything else, kind o like tunnel vision where a crew is so fixated on a problem they run out of gas and crash.
Idaho is offline  
Old 05-25-2024, 11:27 AM
  #99  
China Visa Applicant
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Midfield downwind
Posts: 1,923
Default

Originally Posted by Huck
Your ignorance has cost me $78,236 so far. Destined to be far more.
Is that the amount you would have lost if you'd been working for the rates in TA1 compared to the current industry-standard rates created by the Delta, American, United, and Southwest contracts that have been signed in the last two years?
Hacker15e is offline  
Old 05-25-2024, 02:01 PM
  #100  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: May 2024
Posts: 4
Default

Originally Posted by Huck
Did you hear that boys? The monkey can talk.

Your ignorance has cost me $78,236 so far. Destined to be far more.
Allowing your selfishness to blind you into voting yes on a doomed TA cost you (and everyone else) even more. Then instead of opening your eyes to reality, you sought haven in the “safety” of the Screaming Minority WhatsApp group, only to get played like a fiddle by the founder who created it to divide this pilot group even further in order to show her loyalty to management so that she could secure a management promotion…

Placing your trust in her and her minions ended up costing all of us even more.

Originally Posted by Idaho
I regularly encounter admitted 'yes' voters who are fixated on the A plan bump which they would have recieved in TA 1, most of whom have 20+ years on property. It's the sole reason driving their vote, becasue a pension bump has never happened before! It's a miracle! Give praise! They are completely fixated and cannot hear anything else, kind o like tunnel vision where a crew is so fixated on a problem they run out of gas and crash.
“Us 20yr pilots don’t need the ship anymore, let’s crash it into the rocks, loot it, and let the new pilots deal with the wreckage next cycle”
SkabbySnakey is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fussydutchman
Endeavor Air
76
12-02-2019 03:35 PM
Auger In
FedEx
324
05-26-2017 04:30 PM
kfahmi
Hangar Talk
54
01-15-2015 07:18 PM
Sniper
Major
2
12-30-2011 07:50 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices