Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Frontier
Union is right! Spirit plus 1 >

Union is right! Spirit plus 1

Search

Notices

Union is right! Spirit plus 1

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-19-2018 | 09:35 PM
  #71  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Default

The D.O. at Trans States is boasting that these MRJ's are going to be flown for Frontier. I surly hope not. Scope should be our main concern. If not for anything else, this substandard TA is lacking in every principle pertaining to this issue. Accept nothing less than NO FRONTIER EXPRESS EVER!
Reply
Old 12-20-2018 | 01:31 AM
  #72  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by CantStayAway
Close, but not quite. Indigo will buy Spirit. The merger everyone speculates won’t happen and the whipsaw will ensue. New airplanes go to the cheapest bidder.
So let me get this straight...your theory is that Franke who owned NK in a previous life... than bailed and went out for F9... is now going to come back and buy a publically traded profitable airline??? Good luck with that. Previous poster was correct NK scope won’t allow it
Reply
Old 12-20-2018 | 04:36 AM
  #73  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by nkbux
Previous poster was correct NK scope won’t allow it
I’m mostly just stirring the pot. No real theory. Are you sure about the scope thing? If so this is concerning because our attorney told us at road shows that because Indigo is an investment firm, and not an airlines holding company, that it’s impossible to prevent them from buying multiple airlines and keeping them separate. If your scope truly prevents this then we’ve been lied to by ALPA.
Reply
Old 12-20-2018 | 04:44 AM
  #74  
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ReserveCA
Really?
And who will fly all the shiny new A/C when without a contract the new hires dry up again?
Hiring will not be an issue now. The word is out.
Reply
Old 12-20-2018 | 04:54 AM
  #75  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2017
Posts: 356
Likes: 74
Default

Originally Posted by CantStayAway
I’m mostly just stirring the pot. No real theory. Are you sure about the scope thing? If so this is concerning because our attorney told us at road shows that because Indigo is an investment firm, and not an airlines holding company, that it’s impossible to prevent them from buying multiple airlines and keeping them separate. If your scope truly prevents this then we’ve been lied to by ALPA.
Spirit scope language addresses this exact scenario. An entity that purchases a controlling stake in Spirit and decides to keep the two airlines separate may not then “whipsaw” the two seperate airlines against each other.
Reply
Old 12-20-2018 | 05:13 AM
  #76  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by BKbigfish
Spirit scope language addresses this exact scenario. An entity that purchases a controlling stake in Spirit and decides to keep the two airlines separate may not then “whipsaw” the two seperate airlines against each other.
How do you prevent a whipsaw without a merger? Serious question.
Reply
Old 12-20-2018 | 05:25 AM
  #77  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
Default

Spirit:

5. The Company will not assign or allocate flying or aircraft to
the carriers it controls for the purpose of securing contractual
relief or concessions (i.e. no “whipsawing”).

Frontier TA:

5. The Company, Frontier Airlines Holdings, Inc., and Frontier Group Holdings,
Inc. will not assign or allocate flying or aircraft to other carriers any of them
Controls for the purpose of securing contractual relief or concessions from
the Pilots (i.e. no “whipsawing”).
The rest of Section E. and Section H., respectively, appear to be nearly word-for-word, as well.
Reply
Old 12-20-2018 | 05:37 AM
  #78  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
Default

Here is Spirits paragraph regarding this:
6. The Company shall be excused from compliance with the
foregoing paragraphs 1-4 in the event of a “Circumstance
Beyond The Company’s Control
,” the retirement of aircraft
in the normal course of business
, or requirement by a government
agency
that the Company reduce or cancel service,
as well as from paragraph 1 for economic reasons, not related
to the acquisition transaction
, and one of the foregoing is
the cause of non-compliance.
Paragraph 1 for reference:
1. Spirit pilots will have the right to operate all aircraft on hand
at the Company or on firm order for the use of the Company
as of the date of the closing of the acquisition transaction.
Frontier's:

6. The Company shall be excused from compliance with Paragraphs H.1.-H.4.,
above, in the event of a “Force Majeure” as defined in Paragraph E.8., above,
the retirement of aircraft in the normal course of business, or requirement by
a government agency
that the Company reduce or cancel service, as well as
from Paragraph H.1., above, for economic reasons, not related to the
acquisition transaction
, and one of the foregoing events is the cause of noncompliance.
Force Majeure:
8. “Force Majeure,” as used in this Section 1, means one or more of the
following extraordinary events or circumstances if it is beyond the control of
the Company and if it negatively impacts the Company’s ability to conduct a
portion of its flight operations, but it does not include the price of fuel,
aircraft, or other supplies, the state of the economy, the financial state of the
Company, or the relative profitability or unprofitability of the Company’s
then-current or projected operations:
a. A natural disaster;
b. Grounding by a government agency, loss, or destruction of Company
aircraft;
c. A decrease in available fuel supply or other critical materials due to
either governmental action or commercial suppliers being unable to
provide sufficient fuel or other critical materials for the Company’s
operations;
d. Revocation of a Company operating certificate;
e. A U.S. Government declared national emergency, a war or act of
terrorism on U.S. soil;
f. Any delay, not caused by the Company, in delivery of new aircraft
scheduled for delivery;
g. A strike by one or more groups of the Company’s employees;
h. A health crisis or pandemic.
Reply
Old 12-20-2018 | 05:41 AM
  #79  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
Default

You guys haven’t learned they won’t follow that anyways.

They’ll do what they want.
Reply
Old 12-20-2018 | 05:50 AM
  #80  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 353
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Trowserchilli
You guys haven’t learned they won’t follow that anyways.

They’ll do what they want.

That’s the truth brother... arbitration 101...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
White Cap
Cargo
49
09-26-2019 06:11 PM
Sailor
Spirit
14254
10-09-2015 07:55 AM
cgull
United
127
04-05-2013 03:43 AM
A320Flyer
Major
21
06-18-2010 11:29 PM
A320Flyer
Major
92
06-12-2010 10:02 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices