Search
Notices

Frontier Hiring.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-02-2016, 07:08 PM
  #4861  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Narrow/Left Wide/Right
Posts: 3,655
Default

Originally Posted by Trowserchilli View Post
How does the group at Allegiant feel about going to PBS?

My opinion, that's going to be a sticking point at Frontier.
May not be a fair comparison as ALG already uses some magic black box bid system for bidding with little to no transparency so going even to PBS will provide the pilots with some sort of visibility on how their schedules are built.

It would be like if Frontier just randomly assigned you trips now, and then asked to go to PBS, you'd say yes, give me some!
full of luv is offline  
Old 07-02-2016, 08:32 PM
  #4862  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2008
Posts: 879
Default

Originally Posted by RockyMntAV8R View Post
And I would also like to offer a big thank you to all who voted for the concessions over the years and especially LOA 67, that's now the crap starting point where we are negotiating from. 
You think an 1113 would have gone better?
FAULTPUSH is offline  
Old 07-03-2016, 06:33 AM
  #4863  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2015
Posts: 497
Default

Originally Posted by FAULTPUSH View Post
You think an 1113 would have gone better?
At this point, sometimes I have to wonder.
Missed Appch is offline  
Old 07-03-2016, 10:14 AM
  #4864  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2016
Posts: 36
Default

And you'd be flat wrong!
NoCoairbus is offline  
Old 07-03-2016, 10:18 AM
  #4865  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Posts: 71
Default

Originally Posted by FAULTPUSH View Post
You think an 1113 would have gone better?
No way to really tell. It is my opinion that it could have been more painful in the short term but it would be highly unlikely that we would be under the same court ordered concessions going into 2017 (almost 7 years since exiting BK) and who knows how much longer this will extend. We would have had a much earlier date to restore and negotiate a new CBA. I know hindsight is 20/20 and hate to say it but the fact that we are leaps behind everyone, (which includes some pilot groups that went the way of the 1113 before us) is fact. Just because it was our turn get kicked does not mean we had to line up for it with a smile. The company had 2 choices to shed pilot cost, negotiate the savings or, if unsatisfied with the results of the negotiation go to the courts for CBA savings through an 1113 hearing. They took what they considered their best option. If F9 thought they could have secured a better deal in an 1113 hearing, they would have gone that route. Here's your pat on back!
RockyMntAV8R is offline  
Old 07-03-2016, 10:35 AM
  #4866  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2015
Posts: 497
Default

My thoughts exactly RockyMntAV8R.
Missed Appch is offline  
Old 07-04-2016, 06:31 PM
  #4867  
Gets Weekends Off
 
F9 Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2010
Posts: 387
Default

Originally Posted by RockyMntAV8R View Post
No way to really tell. It is my opinion that it could have been more painful in the short term but it would be highly unlikely that we would be under the same court ordered concessions going into 2017 (almost 7 years since exiting BK) and who knows how much longer this will extend. We would have had a much earlier date to restore and negotiate a new CBA. I know hindsight is 20/20 and hate to say it but the fact that we are leaps behind everyone, (which includes some pilot groups that went the way of the 1113 before us) is fact. Just because it was our turn get kicked does not mean we had to line up for it with a smile. The company had 2 choices to shed pilot cost, negotiate the savings or, if unsatisfied with the results of the negotiation go to the courts for CBA savings through an 1113 hearing. They took what they considered their best option. If F9 thought they could have secured a better deal in an 1113 hearing, they would have gone that route. Here's your pat on back!
Here's your pat on the back for being a hypocrite:

Originally Posted by RockyMntAV8R View Post
Really! My career (10+ years) at F9 have been much better than it would have been at most legacy carriers during the same time period. Who knows what the future holds at F9 or any company. Tell a Southwest pilot that LCCs are not where you want to hang your hat! This industry is a wild card.
F9 Driver is offline  
Old 07-04-2016, 08:35 PM
  #4868  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: Airbus F/O
Posts: 333
Default

Any thoughts on JetBlue interested in frontier?
phoenix 23684 is offline  
Old 07-04-2016, 09:36 PM
  #4869  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: 1900D CA
Posts: 3,394
Default

Originally Posted by phoenix 23684 View Post
Any thoughts on JetBlue interested in frontier?
Always fun to get a new rumor.

JetBlue buying frontier probably makes less sense then them buying Virgin. Virgin would have given them more west coast capacity than frontier offers. Frontier however is much more profitable and has a really strong order book. 10 more A321s, and 80 early NEOs on order.

If JetBlue was willing to pay 2+ Billion for Virgin they just might be willing to buy frontier too. For Indigo, it would be one heck of a good investment. I think they paid less then 40 million in cash to buy frontier, and assumed about 100 million in debt. To turn around a sell for 2+ billion seems like a pretty good return on investment to me!
Aero1900 is offline  
Old 07-05-2016, 03:58 AM
  #4870  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Posts: 71
Default

Originally Posted by F9 Driver View Post
Here's your pat on the back for being a hypocrite:
Driver,
That post was from 3 years ago and was in reply to a statement that all should leave the LCC companies and go to a legacy. If you don't see a difference (in everything but our pay and benefits) here at F9 in the last 3 years you must remove your blinders, lots have changed. My entire point was to demonstrate that LCC companies in general would be no more of a gamble than a legacy which was the statement I was replying to. Notice how the thread referenced LCC's not ULCC's. We had not even begun our current venture as a ULCC. Ask a WN pilot if the LCC model of the past could not turn into a lucrative career. Not being a hypocrite just calling it like it is. Of course you know that that because instead of defending your position you would rather pull past post out of threads that have nothing to do with LOA 67 and current CBA discussions. I have never said my career at F9 has not had any positives, quite the opposite. I think this solidifies my record of calling it how I see it, positive or negative. However the same cannot be said for you. You will remain a cheerleader for our CBA shortcomings, the very ones you voted for or maybe even sold to this great group of pilots. I don't fault you for voting your conscience but to try to squash any dissenting view is a disservice to this pilot group and yourself. For the record I did not vote for 67 nor any of the concessions associated with the BK. But thanks for keeping the company going and for securing a growing network in DEN -atta-boy!

Last edited by RockyMntAV8R; 07-05-2016 at 04:16 AM.
RockyMntAV8R is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bucking Bar
Frontier
15
07-24-2011 07:07 PM
lolwut
Major
24
12-01-2010 03:21 AM
4 Fan Trashcan
Mergers and Acquisitions
7
01-28-2009 09:27 AM
Ak Pilot
Major
7
07-10-2008 09:30 AM
Freight Dog
Hiring News
3
09-29-2005 04:02 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices