Search

Notices

Hawaiian Hiring FOs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-01-2025 | 09:13 AM
  #981  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,841
Likes: 652
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by Hawaii808
that’s not accurate. If there is a fence and no Hawaiian pilots bid for the vacancy slots then Alaska pilots would have the opportunity bid for the openings. Could new hires get 787? Yes, but Alaska pilots on property would get a crack at it before new hire Alaska pilots.
This.

99% that fences would simply give legacy HAL pilots first shot at WB's. Exceptionally unlikely they would exclude legacy AS pilots to the point where the company would have to hire people for WB vacancies once they run out of HAL pilots.

While legacy HAL folks might hypothetically prefer that, since AS pilots bidding unfilled vacancies would likely be senior, the SLI will likely mitigate that with super-seniority for WB CA's anyway.

I'm also 99% certain that the AS CBA requires that vacancies be made available to old hires before new hires. Allowing the company to set aside vacancies for new hires would invariably screw pilots, as the company would then do things like give desirable base slots to new hires in the interest of recruiting/retention, on the assumption that old hires are less likely to quit.
Reply
Old 06-01-2025 | 09:37 AM
  #982  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,375
Likes: 216
From: 737 FO
Default

Originally Posted by Neosporin
That’s up for debate also, if there’s a fence for the plane, who knows how it will defined, but in theory only Hawaiian legacy could bid it, unless new hires could then be assigned it as a new hire if it goes unfilled during a position/vacancy bid, depending how long a fence is in place…sorry there will a thousands “ifs”.
This conversation will cover the next 5 or so pages of comments.
So, I think new hires could get it. Primarily because we’ll need 100’s more FOs for augmented flights.
Yeah that's not how that works.
Reply
Old 06-01-2025 | 04:21 PM
  #983  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 667
Likes: 217
Default

Originally Posted by Neosporin
That’s up for debate also, if there’s a fence for the plane, who knows how it will defined, but in theory only Hawaiian legacy could bid it, unless new hires could then be assigned it as a new hire if it goes unfilled during a position/vacancy bid, depending how long a fence is in place…sorry there will a thousands “ifs”.
This conversation will cover the next 5 or so pages of comments.
So, I think new hires could get it. Primarily because we’ll need 100’s more FOs for augmented flights.

Hundreds and hundreds of FOs! So many FOs
Reply
Old 06-01-2025 | 11:33 PM
  #984  
Neosporin's Avatar
Line Holder
Veteran: Navy
20 Years
On Reserve
50 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 871
Likes: 17
From: outside
Default

Originally Posted by word302
Yeah that's not how that works.
Oh really how does it work?
See this is where this is going….

No one knows what language will dictate assignments.
If FO vacancies go unfilled, they can hire into it. Its possible.
If Captain vacancies go unfilled….what? One of you seem to know exactly ….
Then the company can junior assign into that seat, although we have no language for that specifically.
This will be up to the arbitrator and writing the language for these scenarios, none of know.
Reply
Old 06-01-2025 | 11:37 PM
  #985  
Neosporin's Avatar
Line Holder
Veteran: Navy
20 Years
On Reserve
50 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 871
Likes: 17
From: outside
Default

Originally Posted by Hawaii808
that’s not accurate. If there is a fence and no Hawaiian pilots bid for the vacancy slots then Alaska pilots would have the opportunity bid for the openings. Could new hires get 787? Yes, but Alaska pilots on property would get a crack at it before new hire Alaska pilots.
Yes, not accurate. We don’t know if Alaska pilots will have a crack at it.
It’ll be in the language for the SLI.
Reply
Old 06-02-2025 | 05:43 AM
  #986  
PineappleXpres's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2022
Posts: 1,732
Likes: 102
Default

Originally Posted by Neosporin
Yes, not accurate. We don’t know if Alaska pilots will have a crack at it.
It’ll be in the language for the SLI.
I don’t see moral standing to put new hires in 787s before Alaska pilots from their side of the fence in first. I don’t think you wrote what you meant.
Reply
Old 06-02-2025 | 08:00 AM
  #987  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,841
Likes: 652
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by Neosporin
Yes, not accurate. We don’t know if Alaska pilots will have a crack at it.
It’ll be in the language for the SLI.
Originally Posted by PineappleXpres
I don’t see moral standing to put new hires in 787s before Alaska pilots from their side of the fence in first. I don’t think you wrote what you meant.
While I think the broad strokes of SLI are pretty much a done deal based on precedent, this is the kind of detail that could be presented to the arbitrator and it seems very unlikely to me that an arbitrator would see any basis in policy or "fairness" to completely exclude AS pilots from WB's under all circumstances. I know there's at least some historical precedent for people bidding WB FO slots which went unfilled from the fenced group.
Reply
Old 06-02-2025 | 08:24 AM
  #988  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2023
Posts: 295
Likes: 44
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
While I think the broad strokes of SLI are pretty much a done deal based on precedent, this is the kind of detail that could be presented to the arbitrator and it seems very unlikely to me that an arbitrator would see any basis in policy or "fairness" to completely exclude AS pilots from WB's under all circumstances. I know there's at least some historical precedence for people bidding WB FO slots which went unfilled from the fenced group.
If history is any indication then Alaska pilots will have the opportunity prior to any new hires. This is why it’s extremely unlikely to see new hires get the 787 in SEA. It’s possible you could see new hires in the 330 in HNL due to the commute, but Alaska pilots will most certainly have priority to new hires for all the fenced widebody positions.
Reply
Old 06-02-2025 | 08:55 AM
  #989  
On Reserve
 
Joined: May 2025
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Default

As a potential new hire this discussion has given me a lot to think about.. like what flight bag is best for the 787? Needs to be able to fit camera gear so I can film my "day in the life of a 787 pilot" series for instagram.
Reply
Old 06-02-2025 | 03:00 PM
  #990  
Neosporin's Avatar
Line Holder
Veteran: Navy
20 Years
On Reserve
50 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 871
Likes: 17
From: outside
Default

Originally Posted by aceyexpress
As a potential new hire this discussion has given me a lot to think about.. like what flight bag is best for the 787? Needs to be able to fit camera gear so I can film my "day in the life of a 787 pilot" series for instagram.
Dude, this is the best post all day!!!

I hope Akamai and the rest of you are correct and everyone gets the seat they want out of this thing! My intent on any comment wasn’t that I know, just that the one poster asked about getting into a 787!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MelodieM
Hiring News
1
06-09-2022 03:41 AM
Flyby1206
Major
41
12-28-2012 10:35 AM
racemey
Hiring News
35
06-18-2010 02:52 PM
ProceedOnCourse
Hiring News
23
08-16-2009 06:40 PM
FlywithStyle
Regional
40
06-28-2009 12:20 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices