Search

Notices

Why I'm voting Yes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-02-2018 | 08:35 AM
  #21  
CaptCoolHand's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,150
Likes: 0
From: Left,Right, Left, Right,Right,Left, Right, Left
Default

Originally Posted by BunkerF16
Not taking it personally I know what you meant. I think towards the end, just before we agreed to the AIP, we were headed in that exact direction. We're never going to get 100% compliance, but we had enough where it was making an impact. Plus we were headed into the busiest part of the year where our SOP flying would have crippled this company. We had the upper hand, or at least significant leverage for the first time in this entire process and I feel we let them off the mat. We left money on the table, I'm convinced of that.
We may have, maybe not. All I know is we've all gotta make a call yes or no. The hard numbers are the hard numbers. I'm trying to quantify the extra time off and better QOL that I'll have. This isn't necessarily all about the W2.
Reply
Old 07-02-2018 | 08:37 AM
  #22  
CaptCoolHand's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,150
Likes: 0
From: Left,Right, Left, Right,Right,Left, Right, Left
Default

Originally Posted by O2pilot
The future is always “uncertain”. Also a trade war would not good for the EU, Canada, or China. We have massive trade imbalances with those blocs that benefit them. We spend our money buying their goods. They refuse to buy ours, as they have massive tariffs already on US goods to protect their industries. Now its their turn and they don’t like it.
WHAT! why would we want trade deals that benefit the USA? we should just pay for the rest of the worlds problems. Maybe Bart Roberts has it right? How's Lagos this time of year?

sarcasm, off... just in case that wasn't clear.
Reply
Old 07-02-2018 | 08:56 AM
  #23  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,154
Likes: 24
Default

Originally Posted by CaptCoolHand
We may have, maybe not. All I know is we've all gotta make a call yes or no. The hard numbers are the hard numbers. I'm trying to quantify the extra time off and better QOL that I'll have. This isn't necessarily all about the W2.

True. It is what it is at this point. The decision is whether this is something you can stomach for the next 6-7 years or whether we're willing to fight to make this a contract we can be proud of.
Reply
Old 07-02-2018 | 11:14 AM
  #24  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Default

The upcoming downturn shouldn’t have any weight on your decisions. 2 easy things to keep in mind. If it does go south, half of us are furloughed anyway so we won’t have the chance to enjoy our TA. And second, you do realize every contract was thrown out in court in 2002. Nice try Shu.
Reply
Old 07-02-2018 | 11:23 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by hyperboy
You gonna back my family financially if things go south in your scenario? Thought so I like gambling...alot!....not that much!
Never let fear mongers dictate these decisions, no one can or ever has predicted economic ups or downs with absolute certainty. Make the decision if this is good for you now, if not vote no. Fear factoring is childish, stop trying to instill fear into the equation. Is the deal that bad, that it can’t stand on its own merits, but rather must rely on fear to sell it? Shameful. Good luck guys.
Reply
Old 07-02-2018 | 11:44 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by dogpilot
Never let fear mongers dictate these decisions, no one can or ever has predicted economic ups or downs with absolute certainty. Make the decision if this is good for you now, if not vote no. Fear factoring is childish, stop trying to instill fear into the equation. Is the deal that bad, that it can’t stand on its own merits, but rather must rely on fear to sell it? Shameful. Good luck guys.
I don't think anyone is relying on fear. A calculus of risk vs reward should be part of the decision. Some are more risk tolerant than others. Someone who isn't risk tolerant isn't somehow a bad person or shameful for voting in accordance with their own needs, nor are they for sharing their perspective.

It is shameful to attack/ridicule other pilots for not voting how you think they should vote.
Reply
Old 07-02-2018 | 11:57 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Default

Isn't the unemployment rate hugely tied to airline success? Poor people don't buy airline tickets. Struggling businesses don't hire people, therefore the macrocosm of US business is much different than the OP suggested. The unemployment rate has steadily improved during Trump, as much as I disagree with a lot of the things he does. It's at it's lowest point since 2000.
Reply
Old 07-02-2018 | 12:01 PM
  #28  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,154
Likes: 24
Default

Originally Posted by Southerner
I don't think anyone is relying on fear. A calculus of risk vs reward should be part of the decision. Some are more risk tolerant than others. Someone who isn't risk tolerant isn't somehow a bad person or shameful for voting in accordance with their own needs, nor are they for sharing their perspective.

It is shameful to attack/ridicule other pilots for not voting how you think they should vote.

Not true. Many people are taking into consideration what happens if the economy tanks tomorrow. That's fear, irrational fear. And it's even been propagated by many of the MEC members and several other top union officers.
Reply
Old 07-02-2018 | 12:03 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by BunkerF16
Not true. Many people are taking into consideration what happens if the economy tanks tomorrow. That's fear, irrational fear. And it's even been propagated by many of the MEC members and several other top union officers.
It isn't irrational at all. If the economy tanks and we are still negotiating, our position will likely be worse. That absolutely should be considered.

The fact that you accept that risk is fine. Others do not accept that risk, which is fine also. But to deny that it exists as a risk at all is incorrect.
Reply
Old 07-02-2018 | 12:07 PM
  #30  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,445
Likes: 0
Default

So, we should accept a sub standard contract now, when we have a choice and things are good. That way we won't get a substandard contract later?

Genius.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DALFA
Delta
295
05-06-2017 09:04 AM
Fr8 Pup
Cargo
170
06-21-2012 10:03 PM
Bluto
Major
41
06-02-2012 10:00 AM
RockBottom
Regional
3
06-05-2008 04:44 PM
DLax85
Cargo
9
08-05-2007 06:07 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices