JetBlue Latest and Greatest
01-27-2021, 04:59 PM
Line Holder
Joined APC: May 2014
Posts: 42
It's funny to think about all the time spent debating about how we should be getting PS or 3% COLA for this before the final language came out. Throw in PS and 3% COLA and industry leading Health Care and its still not worth it.
01-27-2021, 05:05 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Posts: 208
Originally Posted by Wounded Duck
It's funny to think about all the time spent debating about how we should be getting PS or 3% COLA for this before the final language came out. Throw in PS and 3% COLA and industry leading Health Care and its still not worth it.
NO DAMN WAY!!
N
O
FREAKING WAY!
01-27-2021, 05:09 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 918
Originally Posted by Bluedriver
Why would allowing RJ's hub-to-hub EVER be considered or included in this agreement?
Also, pilots can't prevent an airline merger, but if JB pilots allow these outsourcing provisions into the CBA with AA, and then JB+AA enter a merger agreement, I don't believe JB pilots have any scope leverage in joint CBA negotiations, as they would have already allowed outsourcing with AA regionals.
Also, pilots can't prevent an airline merger, but if JB pilots allow these outsourcing provisions into the CBA with AA, and then JB+AA enter a merger agreement, I don't believe JB pilots have any scope leverage in joint CBA negotiations, as they would have already allowed outsourcing with AA regionals.
Additional restrictions (4.C.ii)
The Company Code shall not be placed on any Codeshare Flight(s) under any form of Wet-Leasing Arrangement.
How is this understood? Because my understanding is that this section would prevent our code being on an Eagle RJ
01-27-2021, 05:11 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,512
Originally Posted by Bgood
So I am a viagra stiff no after seeing this LOA, but I have been seeing a lot of people saying this. However under
Additional restrictions (4.C.ii)
The Company Code shall not be placed on any Codeshare Flight(s) under any form of Wet-Leasing Arrangement.
How is this understood? Because my understanding is that this section would prevent our code being on an Eagle RJ
Additional restrictions (4.C.ii)
The Company Code shall not be placed on any Codeshare Flight(s) under any form of Wet-Leasing Arrangement.
How is this understood? Because my understanding is that this section would prevent our code being on an Eagle RJ
Yet in the very first section it specifically says American and flights operated as American Eagle.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
01-27-2021, 05:39 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Position: 190 captain and “Pro-pilot”
Posts: 2,918
Originally Posted by RiddleEagle18
Keep up the pressure. The LEC is pushing this and telling people it’s a good deal.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
01-27-2021, 05:41 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2020
Posts: 128
Originally Posted by RiddleEagle18
Yet in the very first section it specifically says American and flights operated as American Eagle.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
01-27-2021, 06:04 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 705
Originally Posted by PotatoChip
Remember back in March and April of last year when FAs were prohibited from wearing masks on board...
And now we’re looking at codesharing with Envoy.
It’s been a wild ride...
And now we’re looking at codesharing with Envoy.
It’s been a wild ride...
01-27-2021, 06:32 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: UNA
Posts: 4,417
Originally Posted by nuball5
I don’t think they can send WARN letters until March 1st (60 days prior to May 1st.) Voting closes in February.
01-27-2021, 06:40 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,512
Would they have been allowed to do this had we been growing. Or next year when we grow off of 2021 ASM.
If the answer was Yes? I would’ve considered that relief.
However the answer is no. We aren’t giving them time relief, we are waiving major sections of our scope.
Vote no!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If the answer was Yes? I would’ve considered that relief.
However the answer is no. We aren’t giving them time relief, we are waiving major sections of our scope.
Vote no!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
