Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Age 67 bill

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-24-2023 | 11:43 AM
  #221  
PineappleXpres's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2022
Posts: 1,735
Likes: 110
Default

What extra screening are they referring to. Pilots already get a medical every 6 months. Is it an extra EKG, blood work, or what?
Reply
Old 03-24-2023 | 11:51 AM
  #222  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 302
Likes: 29
From: A330 FO
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
A4A doesn't want it. RAA and NACA do want it, so management is divided. A4A is the 800 lbs gorilla of course, but RAA serves the small towns which are losing service.
As I stated a few times before, there is no reason to have 7 to 12 flights a day to cities that people can drive in 2 hours or less like GSP to CLT and COS to DEN. If the airlines truly wanted to service some of the small towns I am sure they could maybe take a few flights from drivable ones.
Reply
Old 03-24-2023 | 01:11 PM
  #223  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,480
Likes: 1,052
Default

Here's an interesting twist. The bill explicitly forbids any medical exam that other pilots don't already get EXCEPT you have to get a 1st class every 6 months. That's the additional rigorous testing.
Reply
Old 03-24-2023 | 01:29 PM
  #224  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,344
Likes: 41
From: 765A
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy
Here's an interesting twist. The bill explicitly forbids any medical exam that other pilots don't already get EXCEPT you have to get a 1st class every 6 months. That's the additional rigorous testing.
there is no reason to give a 66 year old a more detailed physical than a 64 year old. Honesty, looking at all the out of shape new hires coming through our doors, we should lower the age to start getting a yearly ekg.
Reply
Old 03-24-2023 | 01:46 PM
  #225  
Giordano Bruno's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Default

To the guys claiming "age discrimination," how is it that 65 is "age discrimination," and 67 is not?

If you think age discrimination is, in fact, happening no, and you support anything other than no age restrictions whatsoever, you are a hypocrite in search of justification for a money grab.
Reply
Old 03-24-2023 | 02:18 PM
  #226  
PineappleXpres's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2022
Posts: 1,735
Likes: 110
Default

Originally Posted by Giordano Bruno
To the guys claiming "age discrimination," how is it that 65 is "age discrimination," and 67 is not?

If you think age discrimination is, in fact, happening no, and you support anything other than no age restrictions whatsoever, you are a hypocrite in search of justification for a money grab.
How about the 23 year old ATP requirement? The 18 year old commercial requirement? The 17 year old private requirement? The 16 year old student requirement? How many retired 66 year olds today even care about the 64 year olds of today extending their career?
Reply
Old 03-24-2023 | 02:27 PM
  #227  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,480
Likes: 1,052
Default

Originally Posted by Xray678
there is no reason to give a 66 year old a more detailed physical than a 64 year old. Honesty, looking at all the out of shape new hires coming through our doors, we should lower the age to start getting a yearly ekg.
Of course there is. There is decrease in cognitive function as you age. So there should be a cognitive exam for aged pilots.

And don't worry. Those new hires get an EKG at 35. That's plenty young enough, even for the largest pilots.
Reply
Old 03-24-2023 | 04:55 PM
  #228  
madmax757's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,226
Likes: 30
From: seated - facing forward
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy
Of course there is. There is decrease in cognitive function as you age. So there should be a cognitive exam for aged pilots.

And don't worry. Those new hires get an EKG at 35. That's plenty young enough, even for the largest pilots.
unless they changed it, the EKG at 35 is a base they use for later years. The next one isn’t until 40.
Reply
Old 03-24-2023 | 05:24 PM
  #229  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 44,888
Likes: 684
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by Moonbeam
As I stated a few times before, there is no reason to have 7 to 12 flights a day to cities that people can drive in 2 hours or less like GSP to CLT and COS to DEN. If the airlines truly wanted to service some of the small towns I am sure they could maybe take a few flights from drivable ones.
The reason is $. If lots of people buy tickets, airlines will provide service. If they're short of resources (pilots), they'll do triage based on revenue & profitability... that's what's happening at the regionals.

They're not going to allocate service based on what's "fair" or how far people have to drive, and lose their arse in the process.
Reply
Old 03-24-2023 | 06:50 PM
  #230  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Apr 2022
Posts: 109
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by PineappleXpres
How about the 23 year old ATP requirement? The 18 year old commercial requirement? The 17 year old private requirement? The 16 year old student requirement? How many retired 66 year olds today even care about the 64 year olds of today extending their career?
I agree with everything above. The era of age discrimination needs to go away both on low side and high side. How the powers that be come up with a solution would be the big legal question.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bla bla bla
Regional
49
09-30-2007 07:56 AM
Airsupport
Regional
105
09-27-2007 05:04 AM
fireman0174
Major
79
01-07-2007 08:46 AM
fireman0174
Major
46
11-19-2006 05:49 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices