Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Delta New Hires/Class Dates/Cleared to Train >

Delta New Hires/Class Dates/Cleared to Train

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Delta New Hires/Class Dates/Cleared to Train

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-01-2010 | 05:11 PM
  #41  
Razorback flyer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
From: Uncoveraged...
Default

Isn't there somewhere on Deltanet that they post the newhire class drops (AC/base,) when they are assigned? Anybody know where that is? Used to be a "pilot - newhire" link, but I don't know where that is now.
Reply
Old 08-01-2010 | 06:10 PM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
From: SAAB
Default

Originally Posted by iceman49
Would you allow a flow down if there was not an equal flow up?
What part of my previous post didn't explicitly answer your question? As per the current LOA only a equal number of the pilots that flow up to Delta may flow down to Mesaba. There are already provisions that give unequal protection to the mainline pilots in the event of a flowback. They automatically take all captain positions and the seniority number of the pilots who previously flowed up. Right now they would replace mesaba pilots #63-134 seniority, from day one of ground school. That's an equivalent of instant 14-18 years of seniority, wouldn't you love instant 18 years at Delta?? Those who elect not to flow will lose QOL because of the flow back. Delta mainline pilots lose nothing by allowing pilots to flow up. You speak of quality control being lost with a flow up. News flash we've already been flying the NWA/Delta "product" since 1986 (for Republic Airlines since 1983). Mesaba Airlines has a 66 year perfect safety record!!! The average passenger knows no difference between my little 900 and your maddog. They both have Delta painted on the side. I realize you have sacrificed a lot to get where you are. To see a person not "sacrifice" and attain a mainline number is what really urks most flow-thru opponents on the mainline side. Quality control is pure lip service. If you truly worried about the safety and "integrity" of Delta you would bring all flying back under ONE seniority list. Until then (which I won't hold my breath for) I will proudly give my best customer service/safety for Mesaba Airlines dba Delta Connection.

Last edited by xjsaab; 08-01-2010 at 06:48 PM.
Reply
Old 08-02-2010 | 03:40 AM
  #43  
RockyBoy's Avatar
Doesn't Get Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,599
Likes: 2
Default

Originally Posted by xjsaab
Mesaba pilots won't allow a flow down without a flow up. It must remain equal on both ends. I highly doubt DALPA would even put this insult on the table.
It won't be DALPA that will put it on the table it will be Delta doing it so they don't have to reduce the number of 76 seat jets. Our scope section says there has to be a flow-down but does not specify there must be a flow-up. I lived through the unfair flow-down of CAL pilots to XJT so I support your opinion that it should be fair both ways and I hope it ends up that way. However, Delta will do what they need to do without regards to what is fair and how it effects any of our careers...that is just the way it is and right now it just says they need a flow-down so I'm sure they don't care about a flow-up just because it is fair and the right thing to do.
Reply
Old 08-02-2010 | 04:28 AM
  #44  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Moreover, if there is only a flow down, what is the likeliness that a flow down will flow in to a hostile environment. Read the LOA's; get fired from Mesaba or CPS and lose your DAL number. With language like that, it is important that if the flow downs are kept, we make sure the environment is not hostile for the pilots that opt to flow down. That said, one way to do it, is to not irk the LCA's and APD's by taking the flow up away. The other way is to nuke all of them. Be careful how you craft your argument. The same pilots than can have their flow unilaterally canceled by management can make your life a living nightmare in the even of a flow down.

Not going to express my opinion on this issue. I just want us to realize it is not cut and dry. If you cancel any part of the flow, the quality and the value of what we "had" prior to the sale has materially changed.
Reply
Old 08-02-2010 | 06:44 AM
  #45  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 5
Default

Anyword on the class drop? I guess it isn't really a drop since the class is all returnees, but be nice to know where they are going.
Reply
Old 08-02-2010 | 06:57 AM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
From: SAAB
Default

Originally Posted by RockyBoy
It won't be DALPA that will put it on the table it will be Delta doing it so they don't have to reduce the number of 76 seat jets. Our scope section says there has to be a flow-down but does not specify there must be a flow-up. I lived through the unfair flow-down of CAL pilots to XJT so I support your opinion that it should be fair both ways and I hope it ends up that way. However, Delta will do what they need to do without regards to what is fair and how it effects any of our careers...that is just the way it is and right now it just says they need a flow-down so I'm sure they don't care about a flow-up just because it is fair and the right thing to do.
The good thing is that the Flow is based upon a LOA, if Mesaba Pilots don't agree to the changes then it's dead. It cannot be imposed legally into our contract. My hope was that this flow-thru would help unify two working groups that produce the same service every-time a person bought a NWA ticket. Overall, when we worked for NWA, the spirit was headed towards that direction. Now that it's under the Delta umbrella, that spirit has been knocked to it's knees. This propagated elitist, protectionism attitude has reared its ugly head. We already fly 1000+ departures a day under the "Delta" banner. I'm already working as a Delta pilot, the only difference is who cuts my check and my benefits, and I wear silver bars. PS gold is for sailors, silver is for aviators I fly the same passengers, the same rampies park in SLC, SFO, LGA, EWR, etc.. push/park me. Look at the big picture, we are subcontractors providing the same service.
Reply
Old 08-02-2010 | 07:12 AM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by xjsaab
My hope was that this flow-thru would help unify two working groups that produce the same service every-time a person bought a NWA ticket. Overall, when we worked for NWA, the spirit was headed towards that direction. Now that it's under the Delta umbrella, that spirit has been knocked to it's knees. This propagated elitist, protectionism attitude has reared its ugly head.
I think if you asked your MEC Chair, your negotiating committee, your former MEC Chair or anyone else connected with the process if the "spirit has been knocked to its knees" they would disagree. I've seen a pretty strong relationship built through the connection alliance.

There's no question that the sale has caused some consternation, and that going forward there are going to be changes for pilots flying under the Pinnacle Airlines Holdings brands. However, please don't let the rantings of a few elitists (and they exist on both sides of the issue) cloud the issue.
Reply
Old 08-02-2010 | 07:35 AM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
From: SAAB
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
I think if you asked your MEC Chair, your negotiating committee, your former MEC Chair or anyone else connected with the process if the "spirit has been knocked to its knees" they would disagree. I've seen a pretty strong relationship built through the connection alliance.

There's no question that the sale has caused some consternation, and that going forward there are going to be changes for pilots flying under the Pinnacle Airlines Holdings brands. However, please don't let the rantings of a few elitists (and they exist on both sides of the issue) cloud the issue.
I hope you are correct.
Reply
Old 08-02-2010 | 07:35 AM
  #49  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,655
Likes: 0
From: Narrow/Left Wide/Right
Default

Originally Posted by xjsaab
PS gold is for sailors, silver is for aviators.

Right there you show that you are not a Delta caliber pilot..... Wings of lead have no place on the Delta uniform. Just because the AF needed to differentiate themselves back in.... what...1960.... when they were created does not make a tradition.
Reply
Old 08-02-2010 | 07:48 AM
  #50  
Ferd149's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,457
Likes: 0
From: LAX ERA
Default

Originally Posted by full of luv
Right there you show that you are not a Delta caliber pilot..... Wings of lead have no place on the Delta uniform. Just because the AF needed to differentiate themselves back in.... what...1960.... when they were created does not make a tradition.
Actually it's 1947, but the wings go back to the Army Signal Corp design which, of course, predates WWI.

Oh, and yes, they are a part of a Delta uniform. I proudly wear a pair as a tie tac

Ferd
USAF, ret
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
Babur
Regional
158
09-15-2009 07:14 AM
FL450
Mesa Airlines
554
06-07-2009 10:04 AM
ToiletDuck
Major
6
04-21-2009 06:33 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
03-10-2005 10:55 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices