Mesa
#7301
I'm sure you already have your answer, but to clarify the previous answers provided, most 121 regionals do not seek an authorization in their ops specs to conduct circling approach manuevers in IMC anymore, and thus they don't typically train for it. (it is one less thing to do in that costly sim).
Additionally, in 2013 the FAA modified TERPS criteria, expanding the visibility required to shoot a circle-to-land approach in IMC. For a Cat C/D aircraft, the new visibilities required are often 3 SM or greater, so it's essentially a pointless manuever for a Cat C/D operator who primarily operates US domestic 121 flights.
XDashDriver I'm not sure what the approach speed of the Dash is, but if it was Cat A/B perhaps that helps to explain why Mesa actually authorized and trained for IMC circling in the Dash.
Cargo operators and operators who frequent countries like China where such procedures are more common are probably more likely to train for it. And the CAAC in China does require all circling limitations to be removed from the type and the ATP before validating your license/privileges.
Hope that provides more depth on the topic. Go read here if you're bored and geeking out on this Saturday night:
FAA Expands Size of Protected Airspace for Circling Approaches | NBAA - National Business Aviation Association
Additionally, in 2013 the FAA modified TERPS criteria, expanding the visibility required to shoot a circle-to-land approach in IMC. For a Cat C/D aircraft, the new visibilities required are often 3 SM or greater, so it's essentially a pointless manuever for a Cat C/D operator who primarily operates US domestic 121 flights.
XDashDriver I'm not sure what the approach speed of the Dash is, but if it was Cat A/B perhaps that helps to explain why Mesa actually authorized and trained for IMC circling in the Dash.
Cargo operators and operators who frequent countries like China where such procedures are more common are probably more likely to train for it. And the CAAC in China does require all circling limitations to be removed from the type and the ATP before validating your license/privileges.
Hope that provides more depth on the topic. Go read here if you're bored and geeking out on this Saturday night:
FAA Expands Size of Protected Airspace for Circling Approaches | NBAA - National Business Aviation Association
#7302
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,674
Likes: 0
Yup, it is CAT B...just didn't go to such great lengths to explain it like you did. We actually needed to do circling approaches to get into the mountain airports too.
#7303
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
I'm sure you already have your answer, but to clarify the previous answers provided, most 121 regionals do not seek an authorization in their ops specs to conduct circling approach manuevers in IMC anymore, and thus they don't typically train for it. (it is one less thing to do in that costly sim).
Additionally, in 2013 the FAA modified TERPS criteria, expanding the visibility required to shoot a circle-to-land approach in IMC. For a Cat C/D aircraft, the new visibilities required are often 3 SM or greater, so it's essentially a pointless manuever for a Cat C/D operator who primarily operates US domestic 121 flights.
XDashDriver I'm not sure what the approach speed of the Dash is, but if it was Cat A/B perhaps that helps to explain why Mesa actually authorized and trained for IMC circling in the Dash.
Cargo operators and operators who frequent countries like China where such procedures are more common are probably more likely to train for it. And the CAAC in China does require all circling limitations to be removed from the type and the ATP before validating your license/privileges.
Hope that provides more depth on the topic. Go read here if you're bored and geeking out on this Saturday night:
FAA Expands Size of Protected Airspace for Circling Approaches | NBAA - National Business Aviation Association
Additionally, in 2013 the FAA modified TERPS criteria, expanding the visibility required to shoot a circle-to-land approach in IMC. For a Cat C/D aircraft, the new visibilities required are often 3 SM or greater, so it's essentially a pointless manuever for a Cat C/D operator who primarily operates US domestic 121 flights.
XDashDriver I'm not sure what the approach speed of the Dash is, but if it was Cat A/B perhaps that helps to explain why Mesa actually authorized and trained for IMC circling in the Dash.
Cargo operators and operators who frequent countries like China where such procedures are more common are probably more likely to train for it. And the CAAC in China does require all circling limitations to be removed from the type and the ATP before validating your license/privileges.
Hope that provides more depth on the topic. Go read here if you're bored and geeking out on this Saturday night:
FAA Expands Size of Protected Airspace for Circling Approaches | NBAA - National Business Aviation Association
It is understandable, I don't think I ever did a circling approach in IMC even though we are allowed to do them, and train them in the sim.
I guess it is one less thing to potentially Fk-up in the sim. 😊
#7304
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Why do you care so much about this limitation if you've never done it? Does it give you a hard on knowing you have the ability to circle? Go apply at cape air bro.
#7305
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Any Mesa folks commuting from Phoenix or Dulles to Houston? Or, even better, from Austin? I've heard intra-Texas commuting is tough.
#7306
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
I thank people like flapshalfspeed for taking the time to provide good information.
You on the other hand are totally useless in this forum.
Good luck!
#7308
Not trying to air out our dirty laundry on here, but is there any place where you can "report" FA's? I was just on a trip with some ghetto ass FA who constantly cursed in front of passengers, yelled at me for asking a question referring to the pax count. And after first introducing herself she referred to herself as a "pilot hater". It was quite ridiculous.
#7309
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
Not trying to air out our dirty laundry on here, but is there any place where you can "report" FA's? I was just on a trip with some ghetto ass FA who constantly cursed in front of passengers, yelled at me for asking a question referring to the pax count. And after first introducing herself she referred to herself as a "pilot hater". It was quite ridiculous.
#7310
Not trying to air out our dirty laundry on here, but is there any place where you can "report" FA's? I was just on a trip with some ghetto ass FA who constantly cursed in front of passengers, yelled at me for asking a question referring to the pax count. And after first introducing herself she referred to herself as a "pilot hater". It was quite ridiculous.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



