Mesa
#8604
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Then just type in your origin and flight number. Also works on the iPad, which FTWeb doesn't.
#8605
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
I NEVER thought in a million years I would even consider Mesa but with the easy bases and changes in 117 now it might not be a bad option. Could anyone tell me about the training program(recent) and how bad is that contract?
#8606
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
And all of those were aircraft where you could legally go from the dash to the jet. If they put 175 in IAD there are contractual ways to switch from the crj to the erj then. Should have clarified that.
#8607
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,674
Likes: 0
You could move from DH8 FO to jet CA regardless of base so that doesn't really make any difference. The problem was not being to go from CRJ FO to DH8 CA, or any FO to FO moves. Having aircraft co-based opens up all of those possibilities in a domicile displacement. My point is that the company will obviously try to avoid co-basing whenever it can, however there are times where it can't reasonably be avoided (such as UAL saying 175s are going to IAD).
#8608
Incorrect, only way contractually for a CRJ CA to bid E75 CA is if both aircraft have an IAD base and there is a closure of CRJ or bump and flush, allowing a CRJ CA to bid E75 CA if their seniority can hold it to avoid being bumped out of the base.
#8609
Way easier: http://mesanet.mesa-air.com/CrewKiosk/ftWebDocs/
Then just type in your origin and flight number. Also works on the iPad, which FTWeb doesn't.
Then just type in your origin and flight number. Also works on the iPad, which FTWeb doesn't.
#8610
Anybody know what happened with one of our 700s going off the runway in BUF? Only report I've seen so far is that they circled a bunch of times then could not get the plane stopped on the runway. Flap failure?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



