Notices
Mesa Airlines Regional Airline

Mesa

Old 06-09-2015 | 11:46 AM
  #8661  
ScottyDo's Avatar
Chief Engineer
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 815
Likes: 0
From: CRJ FO
Default

Originally Posted by tinman1
Our gate agent didn't want to face the pax during the delays, so she just came down to the A/C to hang with the crew and grab something to drink.
I yelled at a gate agent for doing that once. The plane was down for MX the rest of the crew was already on the aircraft. I arrived late from another flight I was working. I stood at the gate for 20 minuets waiting to go down along with 20 passengers waiting for the gate agent as well. She finally came up after I called dispatch. I was not very nice.

As far as the company acknolgment goes, of course it's not enough, but it's a step in the right direction.
Old 06-09-2015 | 11:57 AM
  #8662  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
From: Captain - Retired
Default

Originally Posted by 24/48
RV is correct. Qualifications matter not, I would argue that once you've been on-line in the 121 world for about 6-12 months then you've got the qualifications to do the job whether it's a regional or a major. Majors just have the luxury to be selective whereas regionals don't. When UA began their big hiring boom we were seeing average hours for new hires north of 10,000, now it's probably 6,000-7,000 and dropping.

Additionally, you go from the left seat of an RJ to the right seat of a 737 or Airbus because that's what your new seniority can hold. Sure you went from the left seat back to the right seat but chances are you'll be making more in the right seat of major than the left seat of a regional. Starting pay at UA is $70/hr 1st year and jumps over $100/hr 2nd year. Not to mention the work rules, retirement, etc.

I will agree that it is backward, and I'm all for the flying done by regionals coming back to the mainline. In fact, it slowly is. The 319's at UA are moving in to cover what the 70-76 seaters are doing, and the 70-76 seaters are moving to cover the 50 seaters that are getting parked. Word is DAL's TA lowers the cap for DCI from 450 hulls to 425, and UA is next up at the plate so we'll hopefully drop to 425 or better.
Both of you seem to have missed my point entirely. I'm not talking about qualifications and minimum hiring experience...I didn't even mention it. I'm talking about how much experience is needed as a first officer before becoming a captain.

24/48...the way you responded to my statement it seems you are saying that it only takes 6-12 months of being a copilot before being qualified to be a captain regardless of previous experience!!? That's a bit insane.

I understand that modern jet airliners are designed to be idiot proof and don't require nearly as much skill to fly as the job used to require but 6-12 months?

My point is that a large jet is a large jet is a large jet when it comes to the level of skill and experience needed to fly it. Yes it's possible to take a low time pilot and make them a captain in a few years and it doesn't matter if it's a EMB-175 or a B-787...you can teach a reasonably capable pilot to fly just about any modern airliner...the size doesn't have much to do with it.

My point is to ask the question.... do you really want to?

Theoretically, an airline needs almost as many co pilots as captains to fill a schedule...not accounting for modest industry growth and fluctuations in the hiring and retirement ages of pilots, a typical airline will hire a first officer and that average first officer will spend almost the first half of their entire career as a co pilot, gaining valuable experience before the position of captain is available.

This is what seniority was designed for...this was how it was supposed to work and this is the way it used to work. The problem is that it doesn't work this way any more and we have a system of "regionals" which are in fact full scale large national airlines that cover schedules coast to coast flying large jets that used to be flown by the mainline. Commuter airlines don't really even exist anymore (there are a very few left and they're slowly dying).

The so called "regionals" are putting low time captains in the left seat with very little career experience....They are earning wages that aren't even as good in many cases as the first officers on mainline fleets.

Seniority is a tool perpetuated by the unions and used by big airline management to disrupt the natural flow of experience and put low paid and (mostly) low time pilots in the left seats of half the flights in the US while much higher time pilots (again generally speaking) often with many years experience as large jet captains will wallow in the right seat of Boeing and Airbus jets at higher (but still artificially low) pay.

It's a total waste of experience and an inefficient distribution of the available talent in the US. But...it saves millions of dollars in labor costs at the expense of pilots.
Old 06-09-2015 | 12:20 PM
  #8663  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by NineGturn
It's a total waste of experience and an inefficient distribution of the available talent in the US. But...it saves millions of dollars in labor costs at the expense of pilots.
Well said, sir.
Old 06-09-2015 | 12:31 PM
  #8664  
deltajuliet's Avatar
Living the Dream
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,795
Likes: 0
Default

I think 24/48 was saying after 6-12 months you have enough experience to adequately perform the duties of a First Officer at a regional or major, not to be a Captain.

I agree with everyone it would make more sense to go from CRJ FO to A320 FO, as opposed to CRJ FO to CRJ Captain to A320 FO. But we'd need flying back at mainline for that. As it stands, it's worked okay so far because upgrade times were usually a few years, now it's often as fast as you can get 1000 121 SIC. I still think an American pilot who upgraded at 1000 hours is safer than a lot of foreign 3rd/2nd world Captains, but we'll see if it creates any problems over the next year or two.
Old 06-09-2015 | 12:40 PM
  #8665  
Harpyr's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by RB211
Mesa has no staffing issues with the pilots. Read between the lines.
This. Its primarily an issue with how often the aircraft can get rotated into MX, compounded by the rampers themselves. Staffing isn't the problem. Lack of spare aircraft is also a problem, but future deliveries will help, I think.
Old 06-09-2015 | 12:53 PM
  #8666  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ScottyDo
acknolgment
Dude......
Old 06-09-2015 | 12:57 PM
  #8667  
deltajuliet's Avatar
Living the Dream
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,795
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Harpyr
This. Its primarily an issue with how often the aircraft can get rotated into MX, compounded by the rampers themselves. Staffing isn't the problem. Lack of spare aircraft is also a problem, but future deliveries will help, I think.
Sounds like 407 could be put to better use in Dallas.
Old 06-09-2015 | 12:58 PM
  #8668  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,602
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by RV5M
Dude......
Haha I thought I was the only one to catch that.
Old 06-09-2015 | 01:04 PM
  #8669  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ScottyDo
I yelled at a gate agent for doing that once. The plane was down for MX the rest of the crew was already on the aircraft. I arrived late from another flight I was working. I stood at the gate for 20 minuets waiting to go down along with 20 passengers waiting for the gate agent as well. She finally came up after I called dispatch. I was not very nice.

As far as the company acknolgment goes, of course it's not enough, but it's a step in the right direction.
YELLED at a gate agent? In front of pax?
Sorry but that's just unprofessional.
Unless by "yelled" you mean admonished and you did it in a low voice away from the public. (?)
Old 06-09-2015 | 03:18 PM
  #8670  
24/48's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by NineGturn
Both of you seem to have missed my point entirely. I'm not talking about qualifications and minimum hiring experience...I didn't even mention it. I'm talking about how much experience is needed as a first officer before becoming a captain.

24/48...the way you responded to my statement it seems you are saying that it only takes 6-12 months of being a copilot before being qualified to be a captain regardless of previous experience!!? That's a bit insane.

I understand that modern jet airliners are designed to be idiot proof and don't require nearly as much skill to fly as the job used to require but 6-12 months?

My point is that a large jet is a large jet is a large jet when it comes to the level of skill and experience needed to fly it. Yes it's possible to take a low time pilot and make them a captain in a few years and it doesn't matter if it's a EMB-175 or a B-787...you can teach a reasonably capable pilot to fly just about any modern airliner...the size doesn't have much to do with it.
As deltajuliet pointed out, I was merely referring to 6-12 months of 121 time is sufficient to perform duties as an FO regardless of the size of the aircraft, regional or mainline.

Originally Posted by NineGturn
My point is to ask the question.... do you really want to?
Which point? Huh?........sorry couldn't resist

In all seriousness, the screening process at the regional level leaves a lot to be desired. At mainline, the screening is a lot more stringent, and not as many "bad apples" get through, but we still have our douche bags, most are scabs that stole their jobs or former Skywest pilots.

Either way, everyone learns and absorbs the necessary skill set to do the job at different rates. I remember a designated examiner I used all the time as a CFI that got hired at CAL around the same time as me and he struggled in training. In fact, I don't think he made it. Meanwhile, some of the 2500TT/0TPIC XJT kids were smoking through training without issue.

Originally Posted by NineGturn
Theoretically, an airline needs almost as many co pilots as captains to fill a schedule...not accounting for modest industry growth and fluctuations in the hiring and retirement ages of pilots, a typical airline will hire a first officer and that average first officer will spend almost the first half of their entire career as a co pilot, gaining valuable experience before the position of captain is available.
An international airline, like all US majors carry more FO's than Captains. For instance, at UAL the IAH 777 base has just over 50 CA's and about 110 FO's. Since we augment on every fleet except the Airbus, we have more FO's.

Originally Posted by NineGturn
This is what seniority was designed for...this was how it was supposed to work and this is the way it used to work. The problem is that it doesn't work this way any more and we have a system of "regionals" which are in fact full scale large national airlines that cover schedules coast to coast flying large jets that used to be flown by the mainline. Commuter airlines don't really even exist anymore (there are a very few left and they're slowly dying).

The so called "regionals" are putting low time captains in the left seat with very little career experience....They are earning wages that aren't even as good in many cases as the first officers on mainline fleets.

Seniority is a tool perpetuated by the unions and used by big airline management to disrupt the natural flow of experience and put low paid and (mostly) low time pilots in the left seats of half the flights in the US while much higher time pilots (again generally speaking) often with many years experience as large jet captains will wallow in the right seat of Boeing and Airbus jets at higher (but still artificially low) pay.

It's a total waste of experience and an inefficient distribution of the available talent in the US. But...it saves millions of dollars in labor costs at the expense of pilots.
To your point about seniority, etc. Are you saying that you would prefer a merit based system? If so, just look around the forum and you can read the passion of airline pilots. We are all A types willing to do what it takes to achieve a goal. A merit based system is ripe for manipulation by both management and the pilot. Favorites will be played and at the end of the day it still won't be the most qualified individual using the tiller.

Not sure what your background is, but you come across as a senior RJ Captain that wouldn't/couldn't make the leap to first year FO pay at a major. Meanwhile, many of the folks who pulled gear for you are flying made the sacrifice to go to mainline and it just chaps you a bit.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nwa757
Regional
31
07-31-2018 04:58 PM
AirbornPegasus
Regional
14
04-08-2009 07:17 PM
Spanky189
Regional
10
05-16-2008 09:38 AM
familyguy
Regional
49
04-11-2008 12:03 AM
LOW FUEL
Regional
104
08-17-2007 04:41 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices