Search

Notices
Mesa Airlines Regional Airline

New Mesa Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-14-2016 | 03:37 PM
  #4451  
squawkoff's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
From: ????
Default

Originally Posted by Xdashdriver
Most junior CA awarded on the latest award was hired Aug 2015.
On standing bid 16-02 two upgrades were selected that were hired 9/2015.
Old 02-14-2016 | 05:31 PM
  #4452  
Line Holder
10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,674
Likes: 0
Default

Yup...upgrade DOH bounces around like that.
Old 02-14-2016 | 06:45 PM
  #4453  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 977
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by iFlyRC
Attrition will help the new guys, keep hearing that 15 CA's left this month, but can't confirm.
Ok so that attrition represents 1.25% of the pilot group. If we maintain an overall roster of 1200-1500 pilots (that's about where we'll be after the 18th additional EJet arrives), and if we maintain an attrition rate of ~15-20 pilots/month, the math perfectly supports my assertion that a new hire FO with zero 121 time is looking at a 40-45% bump in FO seniority over a three year period, and a 1-2 year wait for upgrade after that.

Assuming that most of the people above them will be hitting 1,000 hours 121 time over that three year period as an FO, and subtracting off the lifer FOs, I'm very confident that unless there is a significant uptick in attrition (as a fraction of the pilot group), my statement holds--a new hire with zero 121 is looking at a 4-5 year upgrade time.

A lot of Houston pilots (particularly us Houston Captains) have developed a very skewed perspective on how fast things are moving systemwide, because we're a small base that's still receiving new birds on a regular basis (and because the CRJ guys are essentially ring-fenced off from our operation by the current contract).

1.25% global average attrition looks and "feels" like a lot more movement to an IAH CA or FO than it does to an IAD CA or FO--just saying. You have to look at the math to really understand what a new hire can actually expect in progression.
Old 02-14-2016 | 07:09 PM
  #4454  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 977
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by BeatNavy
Estimations on movement and upgrade times aren't factual information, even if flaps says it. Facts are that 2/3 of the seniority list at DL and I think AA/UA as well will retire in the next 10 years. A lot of that will happen in the next 5 years. Everyone who is still stuck in the lost decade mindset that there is no hiring and movement outside of regional growth hasn't absorbed that yet. Movement is happening. Attrition off the top at Mesa is happening. Lifers are changing their mind. Lateral moves aren't the only moves FOs are making either. LCCs are growing, legacies are growing, and retirements are happening. Even an economic downturn and the rise of oil prices in 9-12 months can't stop the retirements, and regional pilots (even Mesa ones) will move to LCCs and legacies (Until age 67 happens and delays it a couple more years). Until the right seats aren't filled, upgrades will remain quick (<2 years) here.
1.25% attrition from the Captain ranks between January 1st and now. Until I see that number climbing, I will be in a "lost decade" mindset.
Old 02-14-2016 | 07:22 PM
  #4455  
Covfefe
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,001
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by flapshalfspeed
1.25% attrition from the Captain ranks between January 1st and now. Until I see that number climbing, I will be in a "lost decade" mindset.
The number has to climb. It's science.
Old 02-15-2016 | 12:56 AM
  #4456  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 977
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by BeatNavy
The number has to climb. It's science.
So, a potential new hire should give up ~5-15k in signing bonus and ~15-28k more per year salary for 2-5 years as an FO (with equalizing upgrade times at all regionals), because of your unfounded assertion that "the number has to climb."

Sounds more like astrology than science to me.
Old 02-15-2016 | 03:11 AM
  #4457  
Navmode's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 774
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by BeatNavy
The number has to climb. It's science.
Originally Posted by flapshalfspeed
So, a potential new hire should give up ~5-15k in signing bonus and ~15-28k more per year salary for 2-5 years as an FO (with equalizing upgrade times at all regionals), because of your unfounded assertion that "the number has to climb."

Sounds more like astrology than science to me.
I think he meant that with no real reason to come here, the attrition is going to increase. It's still no reason to come here on a gamble that you'll upgrade in slightly less time than somewhere that has an acceptable contract.
Old 02-15-2016 | 03:27 AM
  #4458  
Covfefe
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,001
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by flapshalfspeed
So, a potential new hire should give up ~5-15k in signing bonus and ~15-28k more per year salary for 2-5 years as an FO (with equalizing upgrade times at all regionals), because of your unfounded assertion that "the number has to climb."

Sounds more like astrology than science to me.
It's an Anchorman quote. Maybe it's before your time...forgot you were so young. But, just for kicks, mark the post and check back at years 1-5 on Feb 14th and we can go over actual attrition stats. Just because I didn't show the math in my post doesn't mean it's unfounded. And equalizing upgrade times at all regionals? Ha. Tell that to the prior SKW/XJT/RAH/9E/GoJet/Wisky guys who just started here.
Old 02-15-2016 | 04:39 AM
  #4459  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 519
Likes: 0
Default

Based on posts I read in this thread, those must be some really dumb pilots, leaving those places to go fly for Mesa. There is nothing to be offered at Mesa other than low pay, right?

Originally Posted by BeatNavy
It's an Anchorman quote. Maybe it's before your time...forgot you were so young. But, just for kicks, mark the post and check back at years 1-5 on Feb 14th and we can go over actual attrition stats. Just because I didn't show the math in my post doesn't mean it's unfounded. And equalizing upgrade times at all regionals? Ha. Tell that to the prior SKW/XJT/RAH/9E/GoJet/Wisky guys who just started here.
Old 02-15-2016 | 04:56 AM
  #4460  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by BobJenkins
Based on posts I read in this thread, those must be some really dumb pilots, leaving those places to go fly for Mesa. There is nothing to be offered at Mesa other than low pay, right?
Bob, with all due respect, you just kind of lurk around here and lob second or third hand information into conversations that you really don't know much about. Your last comment really highlights that fact.

Everyone has different circumstances and goals, and there is no one size fits all approach to working for the regionals. Yes, much has changed in the past 8-9 months, but before that making a move from one of the airlines listed above to Mesa wasn't a bad deal. Doing so today may not be as great, but it's none of my business. To each his own.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nwa757
Regional
31
07-31-2018 04:58 PM
winglet
Regional
45
12-18-2008 05:06 PM
Past V1
Regional
6
06-23-2008 08:40 AM
Squawk8800
Regional
5
04-08-2008 08:50 PM
calcapt
Regional
17
12-27-2006 06:34 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices