Originally Posted by DOGIII

I think it is about time we expose some of Crusader's hypocrisy: It is malicious for PSA's union to do something that is less beneficial for his group (even though there was no concrete proof in the letter that there is any intention to inflict harm upon envoy pilots, but for the sake of the argument lets say there was), BUT - in his capacity as Cujo's lapdog PilotCrusader is allowed to continue a malicious campaign of scare tactics, spin, and manipulation to maliciously, relentlessly, and directly damage the hiring effort at PSA in-order to get some slight delay in aircraft transfer to help benefit HIS airlines shrinking schedule. I would argue that can also be seen as "less beneficial for another ALPA carrier" - PSA. Even Crusader will admit his deep seeded hatred toward another carrier but than expects their union to follow the moral compass that he himself dropped some miles back down the road.

I will refer you to one important excerpt that is representative of PilotCrusaders flip flops, hypocrisy and double standards: (the context is Crusader has turned a 180 and now understands the pragmatic urgency of a yes vote at Envoy on the last TA. Morals be damned, it now effects PilotCrusader himself; PSA is not allowed to have self preservation guide their decisions, but once again - anything is allowed for Crusader)

Originally Posted by RJ Pilot

This thread should be renamed 'Wheels falling off at PSA'.

Goodluck!

Originally Posted by pagey

How do you feel about it?

Originally Posted by Dunkin

I feel that letter should not have been written. We still have plenty of eligible pilots that can upgrade whether it be current FOs or new hires in training. If some upgrade spots go unfilled they should just hire street captains and let whoever wants to come over do so instead of bringing Envoy pilots with the airplanes. If staffing gets too tight they could delay some of the 700s or park some 200s, but that will be management's decision and not ours'. I say change the SSP to a flow and increase the numbers so that the only way to AA is through one of the wholly owned carriers and the staffing issue will go away.

Originally Posted by PilotCrusader

Oh and this made its debut on Eagle social media today. I would be surprised if you got anything but spit on from this point. It looks like a lot of ****ed off gear swingers and they are even more upset with how the PSA pilots are acting like it is no big deal on here.

Originally Posted by PilotCrusader

Wow. Discredit the source. Straight from the Jerry GlASS playbook. Who would go sift through 6 months of posts to pull something like this out? Mmmhmmmm.

First off kiddo nothing affects me. My name, as it suggests, is to help my fellow pilots. That is why I am so vocal. I'm ou of here sooner than later and bothIf can affect us that much to matter.

My "flip flop", as you put it, is from me realizing that we were not going to win the battle and a continued no vote by our pilots only helped scum like you. Voting yes was the better decision in the end. I wish we had done it sooner, so I definitely made a mistake there.

Keep being a tool and go back and dig for mor exciting PilotCrusader soundbytes taken out of context. Lol.

Originally Posted by PilotCrusader

First off kiddo nothing affects me. My name, as it suggests, is to help my fellow pilots. That is why I am so vocal. I'm ou of here sooner than later and bothIf can affect us that much to matter.

My "flip flop", as you put it, is from me realizing that we were not going to win the battle and a continued no vote by our pilots only helped scum like you. Voting yes was the better decision in the end. I wish we had done it sooner, so I definitely made a mistake there.