Notices
PSA Airlines Regional Airline

PSA info

Old 03-02-2016 | 07:21 AM
  #981  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by pagey
Do you work at PSA? Were you at PSA during the 2013 vote?



The vote was never about "we really wanna fly those jets" it was about surviving to fight another day. That day has now come. This airline will not be staffed unless major improvements are made.



You don't win every battle of a war. With our "concessions" we locked in critical pay which, while being honored by the company, made us the 2nd highest paying regional. It also locked in the most powerful tool in the industry for QoL, for 10 years.



Those ***** made a strategic decision that is now paying off.

I agree with this completely. Now hopefully we will force the company to pony up a better offer than the retention bonus they seem to be talking about.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 03-02-2016 | 07:21 AM
  #982  
chrisreedrules's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,601
Likes: 0
From: CRJ FO
Default

Originally Posted by Slick111
In other words, my union reps don't care what I think. They're just going to tell me what I'm getting. Why tell the pilot group what topics are being discussed/negotiated and encourage their input PRIOR to the negotiations.

Hell, they just had a call-in conference. Was any of this discussed and feedback solicited from the pilot group, as a whole? Maybe we should expect to learn more about our future pay from facebook.




Let's be clear here. The Envoy "hiring and retention bonus" program will NOT benefit any pilots currently employed at Envoy. Nor will it benefit any pilots currently employed at PSA, if adopted. This program is solely and entirely aimed at pilots who are currently employed at OTHER 121 CARRIERS!!!!! NOT CURRENT PSA OR ENVOY FIRST OFFICERS (or Captains)!!!

Here's the language, directly from Envoy's ad: (with my emphasis added)
"Envoy will now offer up to $10,000 for **NEW HIRE** pilots who have Part 121 commercial air carrier experience. In return for a two-year commitment to Envoy,...."
Honestly, I don't think you "get it". The company and the NC negotiate on things. Once the NC feels that they have something worth sending to the pilots for a vote, then and only then do they do so. There is a reason that the MEC outright rejected the original proposal of a 10K signing bonus for new hires and 10K retention bonuses for FOs only. Because NO BONUSES SHOULD BE CONSIDERED unless they include ALL of the pilots. This is what you elect your fellow pilots to represent you for.
Reply
Old 03-02-2016 | 07:23 AM
  #983  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 1stCivDivPilot
The way they've handled the flow is enough proof that taking this pathetic offer is a bad idea.

The flow was supposed to solve everything. It didn't and that knew that almost immediately. Have they come back yet? Nope. They are still waiting until June. Maybe out of stubbornness, pride, delusion? I don't know. They will feed us this scrap and keep marching like its the solution despite all the evidence to the contrary. Meanwhile, we've sold ourselves short and given them a new reprieve.
The flow was never suppose to solve everything? Who told you that. It was part of the 900 deal and the agreement to revisit it was part of that deal. That was the there to get the existing captains to pass 12/4. The upgrades is what tilted the FO's to pass it.
Reply
Old 03-02-2016 | 07:24 AM
  #984  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by IceManCRJ
I agree with this completely. Now hopefully we will force the company to pony up a better offer than the retention bonus they seem to be talking about.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You know the CCP was NOT in the 900 TA
Reply
Old 03-02-2016 | 07:26 AM
  #985  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Waitingformins
I know beyond all doubt if it went only to the captains and not to the FO's this wouldn't be a conversation it would have already been passed.
Bonuses to Captains only means nothing if FOs never show up or bolt for another carrier.
Reply
Old 03-02-2016 | 07:28 AM
  #986  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by chrisreedrules
Honestly, I don't think you "get it". The company and the NC negotiate on things. Once the NC feels that they have something worth sending to the pilots for a vote, then and only then do they do so. There is a reason that the MEC outright rejected the original proposal of a 10K signing bonus for new hires and 10K retention bonuses for FOs only. Because NO BONUSES SHOULD BE CONSIDERED unless they include ALL of the pilots. This is what you elect your fellow pilots to represent you for.
Well the company has already given new hires a bonus without the union's approval, so they can raise it to 10k without their approval. This is ABOUT GIVING FO'S ON PROPERTY A RAISE ABOVE POVERTY.
Reply
Old 03-02-2016 | 07:32 AM
  #987  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Waitingformins
I think your confusing the wet dream you keep having with reality.

Your confusing your greed, as nobel selflessness. At least the captains that voted this down clearly understand its their basic jealously that they weren't included.
Please explain this reality as you seem to have a monopoly on it.

There was no vote.

I never said I wasn't being greedy or selfless. I knew the pay when I came here however, the market has changed.

But please be happy just sitting back selling yourself short. I guess when you've been kicked for so long a slap seems like a good thing.
Reply
Old 03-02-2016 | 07:38 AM
  #988  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Waitingformins
The flow was never suppose to solve everything? Who told you that. It was part of the 900 deal and the agreement to revisit it was part of that deal. That was the there to get the existing captains to pass 12/4. The upgrades is what tilted the FO's to pass it.
I understand the flow was part of the 12/4 deal. You don't think AA was selling the flow so hard in October, before it was even voted on, because they figured it would solve the personnel issues? It certainly isn't helping their retention yet they refuse to come back to the table early and admit their failure.
Reply
Old 03-02-2016 | 07:39 AM
  #989  
chrisreedrules's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,601
Likes: 0
From: CRJ FO
Default

Originally Posted by Waitingformins
Well the company has already given new hires a bonus without the union's approval, so they can raise it to 10k without their approval. This is ABOUT GIVING FO'S ON PROPERTY A RAISE ABOVE POVERTY.
They knew what the pay was when they (myself included) came to PSA. I deal in real estate, and I've both bought and sold successful businesses. I know a thing or two about contracts and negotiations. The fact that the company released that email before the union had a chance to come to the pilot group with something concrete (like a finalized deal) is indicative of subversive politics in and of itself. They are trying to be divisive and get away with attracting new hires as cheap as they possibly can. They know that a lot of FOs will vote for the bonuses with or without the CAs being included. And they know that by releasing that email, timed with the announcement by Envoy, will leave a lot of pilots at PSA salivating for that money (as evidenced by some of the replies here). Don't play into their hand. We have a union because they represent a UNIFIED pilot group. Not just the FOs or just the CAs. I support a bonus. But I support a bonus for all.
Reply
Old 03-02-2016 | 07:40 AM
  #990  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
Default

I love how the company can release info but somehow our representation has their hands tied. I'm sure they do but where's the punishment for the company? The union would get in trouble, wouldn't they?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Joliet
PSA Airlines
47
02-23-2017 07:35 PM
JetJock16
Regional
63
04-08-2016 05:05 PM
Jetstream 823JS
PSA Airlines
157
03-21-2016 02:53 PM
FirstClass
PSA Airlines
32
03-19-2016 04:42 PM
AnotherEagleGuy
PSA Airlines
52
12-02-2015 04:58 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices