Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

PDT News and Rumors

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-18-2015 | 11:51 AM
  #7181  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 843
Likes: 0
From: DHC-8 100/300
Default

Billy, lurker and sublime are just mad that what we've said appears more and more likely to happen here. And yes I am happy to bring the Republic planes back in house! Anyone that thinks PDT is merging or going away has poor listening comprehension, delusional or isn't really a pilot.

And yes, the 190 thing was a joke by one of our instructors. So sublime, lurker... continue crying into your ramen. We don't care about your opinions.

We're on a 2 year plan to up our staffing then begin to transition 175's here from RAH. So saying I'm wrong is all you can do until it plays out. Here's an idea... take a look at the changes to the RAH scope and successorsship language changes in their TA. That was no accident.
Reply
Old 10-18-2015 | 11:59 AM
  #7182  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by PDTpilotXX
Billy, lurker and sublime are just mad that what we've said appears more and more likely to happen here. And yes I am happy to bring the Republic planes back in house! Anyone that thinks PDT is merging or going away has poor listening comprehension, delusional or isn't really a pilot.

And yes, the 190 thing was a joke by one of our instructors. So sublime, lurker... continue crying into your ramen. We don't care about your opinions.

We're on a 2 year plan to up our staffing then begin to transition 175's here from RAH. So saying I'm wrong is all you can do until it plays out. Here's an idea... take a look at the changes to the RAH scope and successorsship language changes in their TA. That was no accident.
What is the benefit to AAG of bringing 175's onto the certificate?

I can't see where it is even close to cost effective. Enlighten me.

Also, addressing the "comprehension, delusional, or isn't really a pilot" bit, let me remind you that the people making these decisions aren't pilots either. Take off your epaulets and think like an accountant, because that what the decision makers do.
Reply
Old 10-18-2015 | 12:12 PM
  #7183  
Lvlng4Spd's Avatar
Happy at PDT
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 983
Likes: 0
From: EMB-145 CA
Default

Originally Posted by sublime259
They're in survival mode over there. Listen to Parker's townhall meeting where one of the PDT employees makes a comment about sending the 190's to them. Was it a joke? Maybe. But it doesn't diminish the fact that barring a merger, the future is grim at PDT with only 20 old 145's and a fleet of rickity dash 8's. I'd be very wary of going to PDT right now as a new hire, although I would say it's ok for the guys currently on property.
If the staffing goals can be met, there will be more than 20 145s transferred. This has been stated by AAG officers and echoed by our new President. He expects that if the staffing is there we will see as many 145s as we can handle as time goes on. Contrary to popular belief, or the mongering of the Eagle *****ing brigade, they will be needed for quite some time. Oh and then there is the 175s...
Reply
Old 10-18-2015 | 12:21 PM
  #7184  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Ex lurker
What is the benefit to AAG of bringing 175's onto the certificate?

I can't see where it is even close to cost effective. Enlighten me.

Also, addressing the "comprehension, delusional, or isn't really a pilot" bit, let me remind you that the people making these decisions aren't pilots either. Take off your epaulets and think like an accountant, because that what the decision makers do.
Tell us oh great one...what shall happen? If you know so much why arent you at mainline or running your own regional? Remind me again what one of your predictions has been proven true?
Reply
Old 10-18-2015 | 12:23 PM
  #7185  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Lvlng4Spd
If the staffing goals can be met, there will be more than 20 145s transferred. This has been stated by AAG officers and echoed by our new President. He expects that if the staffing is there we will see as many 145s as we can handle as time goes on. Contrary to popular belief, or the mongering of the Eagle *****ing brigade, they will be needed for quite some time. Oh and then there is the 175s...
Maybe you can answer a question for me. What is PDT's plan when the 145's hit 40000 cycles. I know what envoys plan was. I want to see if it is different.
Reply
Old 10-18-2015 | 12:24 PM
  #7186  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by payingdues
Tell us oh great one...what shall happen? If you know so much why arent you at mainline or running your own regional? Remind me again what one of your predictions has been proven true?
Wow, it was a simple question.

But since you asked my predictions are:

Envoy will get the firm 175 orders, exercise some options, and take back the Compass aircraft. RAH MAY lease the 175s to Envoy that are sitting due to staffing. They won't divest the whole fleet. Envoy will keep some 145's until they become pumpkins. The Bombardier fleet will go to PSA at some point unless there is a staffing meltdown there.

PDT will get the twenty 145's to trigger the concessions. If taking more means they can continue to get guys through the door with the quick upgrade carrot, you will get more. If guys aren't coming through the door, you merge with envoy and PDTpilotxx gets his 175 seat.

TSA and XJT give back the aircraft transferred to them. AAG says, "hey, your shrinking, we are growing, come on over" in an attempt to poach pilots from airlines that now fly only for their competitors.

Last edited by Ex lurker; 10-18-2015 at 12:53 PM.
Reply
Old 10-18-2015 | 12:48 PM
  #7187  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by PDTpilotXX
We're on a 2 year plan to up our staffing then begin to transition 175's here from RAH. So saying I'm wrong is all you can do until it plays out. Here's an idea... take a look at the changes to the RAH scope and successorsship language changes in their TA. That was no accident.
AAG has made a big deal of single-type fleets at their wholly-owneds. PSA got the CRJs, Envoy got the 175s. So why on earth would they put 175s at Piedmont when they could put them at Envoy (and, if they need to, send more of Envoy's 145s over to Piedmont)?

The changes to the RAH scope and successorship language applies just as easily to moving those planes to Envoy as it does to moving them to Piedmont.
Reply
Old 10-18-2015 | 12:55 PM
  #7188  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
Default

All this back and forth about planes and whats going to happen in 3 years are really useless guys, enjoy your sunday!
Reply
Old 10-18-2015 | 12:57 PM
  #7189  
billyho's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,450
Likes: 0
Default

Really?????????? Who the hell cares???????? LOL This is too funny!! Piedmont will get what AAG wants them to have. Why the hell would Envoy people even care what's going on here at Piedmont??

Yes we are getting used up 145's and yes we're flowing and yes our upgrade time just dropped before a year.
Reply
Old 10-19-2015 | 04:02 PM
  #7190  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Default

EFB's in 2016. Company is buying them. Check the website.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
aviator01
Horizon Air
47
06-24-2008 11:56 AM
triflyier
Cargo
28
05-02-2008 05:26 AM
tankerpuke
Cargo
2
09-23-2007 08:37 AM
Freighter Captain
Hiring News
3
05-16-2005 12:45 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices