Anything New At AWAC?
06-16-2015 | 12:09 PM
#521
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
From: E145 FO
Because it's a Airline Pilot Forum! If you don't want any other airlines posting on a Thread then start your own AWAC Website. 
Plus I have more then a few friends that work there and I see the writing on the wall in Terms of AAG. Piedmont will be taking over all the AWAC flying.
Plus I have more then a few friends that work there and I see the writing on the wall in Terms of AAG. Piedmont will be taking over all the AWAC flying.
06-16-2015 | 12:12 PM
#522
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 441
Likes: 0
From: everywhere but nowhere
Keep in mind AWAC is swimming in cash. Thinking they will stay a 50 seat operator is also short-sighted. They could buy PDT's fleet several times over. Like I've been saying, they may be playing dead but they will remain a player. Nobody is claiming change is easy.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
06-16-2015 | 12:22 PM
#523
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
You do understand that you cannot replace something by taking from the source that you are trying to replace, right? The erjs are coming from American eagle and therefore creating a vacuum in the AAG system. Oh that and you're only getting 20 (while retiring dashes) and AWAC has 70...
06-16-2015 | 12:31 PM
#524
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Keep in mind AWAC is swimming in cash. Thinking they will stay a 50 seat operator is also short-sighted. They could buy PDT's fleet several times over. Like I've been saying, they may be playing dead but they will remain a player. Nobody is claiming change is easy.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
06-16-2015 | 12:33 PM
#525
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
From: E145 FO
In these town hall meetings you refer to, Parker says he "prefers" to keep flying in house- no where does he state that he has ruled out doing otherwise.
06-16-2015 | 12:40 PM
#526
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
You people really need to hear yourselves talk sometimes. You get on here and defend crappy contracts by saying that if you voted them down the flying would go to other carriers, but then turn around and say that all the flying is going to be kept "in house" and that has been their master plan all along... So which is it??
In these town hall meetings you refer to, Parker says he "prefers" to keep flying in house- no where does he state that he has ruled out doing otherwise.
In these town hall meetings you refer to, Parker says he "prefers" to keep flying in house- no where does he state that he has ruled out doing otherwise.
06-16-2015 | 12:44 PM
#527
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
From: E145 FO
You said a lot in that barely intelligible group of words you tried to pass off as a sentence. You did say most, but your tone implies otherwise.
Despite what you are trying to convince everyone, you most certainly do not have it all figured out.
Despite what you are trying to convince everyone, you most certainly do not have it all figured out.
06-16-2015 | 01:44 PM
#528
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,450
Likes: 0
Keep in mind AWAC is swimming in cash. Thinking they will stay a 50 seat operator is also short-sighted. They could buy PDT's fleet several times over. Like I've been saying, they may be playing dead but they will remain a player. Nobody is claiming change is easy.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
06-16-2015 | 01:48 PM
#529
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 441
Likes: 0
From: everywhere but nowhere
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
