Quote:
CRJ 200 for the last 8 monthsOriginally Posted by M20EPilot
I suggest looking at the pairing statistics year over year, or make comparisons starting in March of 2015 when that pairing optimizer first started to be used. The RSR reports are archived on the SAPA website. In my opinion things got much better after the software change.
Credit per DP (March was highest, Oct was 3 min less)
Credit per Day (Gained 3 minutes from March to Oct)
Block per DP (March was highest, Oct was 9 minutes less)
Block per Day (March was highest, Oct was 2 minutes less)
2% less SDO, 4.5% less locals, same 2 days, 4% more 3 days and 2% more 4 days (roughly 50%)
CRJ 700/900
Credit per DP (5 minute gain from March to Oct)
Credit per Day (10 minutes gain from March to Oct)
Block per DP (13 minute gain from March to Oct)
Block per Day (15 minute gain from March to Oct)
1% more SDO, same locals, 3% less 2 days, 8.5% more 3 days and 7% less 4 days (51% down to 44%)
E175 - No big differences other than going from 49% of total pairings being 4 days in March to 73% for October.
So at a quick glance, I can't see much improvement in the 200 flying, in fact it looks like we lost in almost every category. 7/9 looks like we got some efficiency and was able to drop some of the 4 days down to 3 days. E175 looks like you should just plan on being gone for 4 days unless you are in the top 15-20% Locals improved on credit per day but at only 7% of the total pairings, it doesn't really help anyone.
Unless I am missing something, I just don't see it system wide. Even the graphs look pretty flat over the past 8 months. For my domicile layovers dropped a little but SDO's and locals took a huge dive and we got more 4 days because that seems to be what everyone is asking for /sarcasm