Any "Latest & Greatest" about Endeavor?

Subscribe
773  1273  1673  1723  1763  1769  1770  1771  1772  1773  1774  1775  1776  1777  1783  1823  1873  2273 
Page 1773 of 2545
Go to
Quote: There is no 7-20 in the CFM (unless you’re privy to a new CFM the rest of us don’t have yet).

That’s not a Rev 4 thing, it’s in our current manuals, and has been for quite some time now. The FOM page 8-12 tells us LDI & FD are required for RNAV departures, and A/P is recommended.
It is revision 4 thing, it's in the publications library. For all takeoffs, not just RNAV.
Reply
interview
Can someone PM me (or post here) what to expect in an interview... coming in with previous 121. Is it different from if you're coming in having flown nothing but 172s? more casual because they know you've been a 121 pilot? or more intense because they know you're going to potentially be a captain for them within a few months?
Reply
Quote: Can someone PM me (or post here) what to expect in an interview... coming in with previous 121. Is it different from if you're coming in having flown nothing but 172s? more casual because they know you've been a 121 pilot? or more intense because they know you're going to potentially be a captain for them within a few months?
There are quizlet sets for 9E and general regional interview questions which do a good job of preparing 121 and non 121 for the 9E interview.
Reply
I found it to be more the latter. They don't cut you breaks because you're prior 121 but it's not a ball breaker interview either.
Reply
The interview is pretty low key. They want good people. That being said, I wouldn't go in complacent... we have sent prior 121 folks home with no CJO a few times this year.

Quote: Can someone PM me (or post here) what to expect in an interview... coming in with previous 121. Is it different from if you're coming in having flown nothing but 172s? more casual because they know you've been a 121 pilot? or more intense because they know you're going to potentially be a captain for them within a few months?
Reply
Quote: So if a raw data takeoff is too dangerous to practice when it's on your own terms (you choose the conditions such as weather, tiredness, lack of other distracting factors, etc.) then what makes it safe enough to be allowable when you just showed up to a cockpit on leg 4 to discover a yellow sticker on the FCP and it's go-time, and you are about to do this for your first time ever?

This is bizarre.
Let me guess you're against bugging. V-speeds also
Reply
What did he say to give you that ridiculous notion? He makes a valid point that falls under the umbrella of safety.

Quote: Let me guess you're against bugging. V-speeds also
Reply
Quote: Let me guess you're against bugging. V-speeds also
How do you draw that conclusion from what was stated?
Reply
Quote: Good...I don't want any new hires taking off raw data regardless. Way too many people over rotate even with the FD for some guidance.
Yeah let’s further advocate for the degradation of our hand flying skills. Smart!
Reply
Are you sure about that page number? 7-19 thru 7-21 is the take off procedures in “block” format. No verbiage about RNAV anywhere.

7-22 talks about RNAV, but nothing has changed from Rev3B that I can find. (CFM 10-2)

7-16 does get rid of the requirement to select HDG or NAV mode at 400’. (Rev3B CFM 10-19) Now to be selected right after speed mode at V2+10, at V2+10-15 KIAS.

FOM 8-12 already requires the FD and LDI for all RNAV SIDs, and recommends use of A/P.

Quote: Yeah 7-20 in the CFM. The FD must be on for takeoff unless you have an Mel or a lcp.
Reply
773  1273  1673  1723  1763  1769  1770  1771  1772  1773  1774  1775  1776  1777  1783  1823  1873  2273 
Page 1773 of 2545
Go to