![]() |
Originally Posted by JB22
(Post 2142922)
2 things. The 65 737s and 30 320s UA is getting are not allowed to up scope numbers. Only aircraft such as E190. Second thing is if you read and watch their outline, they say these aircraft are specifically to REPLACE 50 seat aircraft. They know passengers don't like them and they know there will be issues staffing them. They are going away. In the next 3 years. And DL has its own agenda.
I agree that there are some routes that shouldn't be RJ operated and it is a good thing that they are going mainline. But here is the conversation that will go down eventually - as long as the 200 can be staffed: SkyWest: "Hey, United, we want to fly a 200 at-risk from DEN to Nowhere, NE. We expect your share to be $20K per month. Did I mention it is at-risk, i.e. the $20K is pure profit going straight to your bottomline and absolutely no downside?" Is UA gonna say: "Oh no, I will pass on that because our passengers want to travel in style (mainline) or not at all" Or will they say: "Sure go right ahead. Thanks for completing our leading network." Either way, I am not sure what message are your trying to bring across. Everyone who wants to move is certainly trying to do so - regardless of some mainline fleet plan. And those people who prefer to stay for whatever personal reason are likely gonna stay regardless of "impending doom". |
Originally Posted by OkStateBryan
(Post 2142890)
I applied Monday at 1:00 and had a call by 4:00.
|
Originally Posted by Honda400F
(Post 2142960)
By the time this happens, most of you will have moved on...
Hopefully. But those planes have already started arriving. |
20 pilots gone so far in June. 12 CA this week alone. The freeze on CRJ to E-175 transitions should cause more concern because it appears that training cannot keep up with upgrades\new hires. We have 2 CRJ bases that have 0 FO reserves (Nice job opening DTW strong out of the gate) and MSP with 3 (2%)
SkyWest may eventually shrink, but only after a couple regionals have gone out of business and their pilots have gone to mainline or here. But by parroting the company line of potential shrinkage, we only give strength to their fear tactics. We still have like 3 or 4 regionals that need to go out of business before I would worry too much. I can hear it now as they meet with our Student Body about raising new hire pay "We don't care if you guys don't agree to raising new hire rates. Even though we can't hire enough to keep up with attrition, we will just stop hiring tomorrow if you don't agree. We don't care if we grow anymore and increase our stock and market value. It's up to you guys. Here is another golden day and we promise to work on the reserve re-write in the next 10 years" SAPA's response "Well, we will go sell this to our pilot group and tell them this is the absolute best you guys can do. But we are going to tell them that we are very angry!! Can you throw in some negotiation training that we can use for the next round?" |
It was important that new hire pay was brought inline with the rest of the longevity scale. Now we can all move on in step and spend no energy or time messing with it moving forward.
|
Originally Posted by Honda400F
(Post 2142960)
By the time this happens, most of you will have moved on...
|
Originally Posted by WesternSkies
(Post 2143021)
It was important that new hire pay was brought inline with the rest of the longevity scale. Now we can all move on in step and spend no energy or time messing with it moving forward.
|
Originally Posted by regionalslave
(Post 2143081)
No it was not important that 1st year pay was raised and everyone else got nothing. Your delusional and part of the problem.
This round, 2nd year and up needs to get their share. |
Originally Posted by WaterRooster
(Post 2143082)
You did get something.... Not much, but something. You need new hires and raising the 1st year pay to be in line with others was a needed move. So YES, it was important.
This round, 2nd year and up needs to get their share. |
Originally Posted by WaterRooster
(Post 2143082)
You did get something.... Not much, but something. You need new hires and raising the 1st year pay to be in line with others was a needed move. So YES, it was important.
This round, 2nd year and up needs to get their share. We need to stop trying to help a certain group and work on gains for all the pilots. Every pay package we get pits the pilot group against each other. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:28 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands