![]() |
Looks like they stopped way short of the projected erj FO number in sfo this month.
|
Originally Posted by sleepy1456
(Post 2332415)
There is no ERJ MSP base. It was labeled wrong in the award.
I saw the same a was bummed, they didn't award anyone really whilst increasing the DVR by 8, I thought they were saving for the new hires but, it sounds like they're not done awarding...? When will they be done.. Bueller? |
Anyone been through AQP on the 175 recently? Recurrent is coming up and was curious if they've worked the initial kinks out. PM me if you have anything you wouldn't mind sharing.
|
Originally Posted by CaptSwift
(Post 2332705)
I saw the same a was bummed, they didn't award anyone really whilst increasing the DVR by 8, I thought they were saving for the new hires but, it sounds like they're not done awarding...? When will they be done.. Bueller?
|
Would anyone happen to know how many of the remaining one hundred E175 options will be added into our fleet after 2018? Asking for a friend....
|
Originally Posted by Duesenflieger
(Post 2332906)
Would anyone happen to know how many of the remaining one hundred E175 options will be added into our fleet after 2018? Asking for a friend....
AKA if Compass ***** the bed and Delta gives us more flying out west |
Originally Posted by N1234
(Post 2332520)
Given the way we all assume the XJT/ASA scenario is playing out I am surprised they are excluded.
If this enables ten senior CA's to leave but only one comes back, SGU is much money ahead. If they give it away XJT, they'll have lots of them coming over next Monday. They'd probably rather they stay at XJT for now. Also, more importantly for SKW pilots...that might be something which could be used to justify a common carrier petition, to force seniority list integration (by DOH of course!). |
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 2332147)
Maybe for the metroliner. I think the bro upgrade at one point went as junior as six months with the company, which would be a few months out of training.
|
Originally Posted by rickair7777
(Post 2332942)
The company agreed to soft-landing because it encourages senior folks to leave. Many of them would not otherwise risk failing out of a new employer, but this way they can return and be back in high-seniority CA money in two years if they need to.
If this enables ten senior CA's to leave but only one comes back, SGU is much money ahead. If they give it away XJT, they'll have lots of them coming over next Monday. They'd probably rather they stay at XJT for now. Also, more importantly for SKW pilots...that might be something which could be used to justify a common carrier petition, to force seniority list integration (by DOH of course!). We won't merge, XJT won't give up ALPA, and SGU won't accept ALPA. |
Originally Posted by EFBprobs
(Post 2332988)
We won't merge, XJT won't give up ALPA, and SGU won't accept ALPA. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:14 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands