Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Southwest
737 MAX - Safe or Unsafe? >

737 MAX - Safe or Unsafe?

Search
Notices

737 MAX - Safe or Unsafe?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-14-2019, 09:28 AM
  #51  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Posts: 348
Default

Originally Posted by hoover View Post
Wasn't it VMC? Why not look outside, use pitch and power and get your head out of the cockpit?
Foreign carriers rely heavily on automation. When it doesn't work planes crash.
Not saying there wasn't a problem with a system but there sure is a problem with lack of flying skills in countries developing avaiation.
Because you can’t use pitch and power when MCAS is doing what it’s doing unless you kill the trim switches. The MCAS is operative WHILE handflying
The issue is recognition of what’s happening.
Air speed unreliable while the stick shaker is going crazy nose pitches down at 1k feet AGL?
You’re telling me that with the current training, you’d figure out what’s going on? You click off autopilot and it gets WORSE? Unless you’ve had training on the system...aside from a CBT.
terminal is offline  
Old 03-14-2019, 09:32 AM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 353
Default

I think that a lot of the Monday morning quarterbacks here should wait for the final results of both investigations before judging the pilots' skills. How easy to criticize those who can't defend themselves. Try also imagining the situation at low altitude when your airplane is aggressively trimming forward, your attitude indicator is showing excessive pitch up, stick shaker is going on, you continuously keep overriding the nose down pitch with your stab trim. As I understand from the little information we got about the MCAS, you can override the auto trim forward with your stab trim switch, but the moment you let go off the switch it immediately trims back down. So you have the trim spinning back and forth (thus the oscillations in both accidents) at low altitude and low airspeed. No memory items to turn of the stab trim cutout switches. Not too much time to run QRH, not enough training and information about the system. Some say the other crew that brought the Lion Air airplane the day prior successfully ran the checklist and turned the stab trims switches off. It's true, but they were much higher, during a descent with completely different aircraft energy and attitude. Think what you want, but I consider blaming the crews for being not experienced or not well trained as scapegoating. I think Boeing created the problem and they should assume the responsibility. And for all you great aviators that have so much experience, think about what they went through right after you take off. Add night conditions or IMC if you like...
barabek is offline  
Old 03-14-2019, 10:13 AM
  #53  
At your mom's house
 
hoover's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: cpt 737
Posts: 2,656
Default

I wouldn't say .27°/second of nose down pitch is aggressive. We take off using 2-3° of nose up pitch per second and that is in no way aggressive.
http://www.b737.org.uk/mcas.htm
hoover is online now  
Old 03-14-2019, 10:20 AM
  #54  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2009
Position: 737
Posts: 190
Default

Try to imagine being a low altitude and not knowing how to manually trim the airplane. If either of these crews had been able to do that, the airplanes would still have been flyable.

They had the ability to correct the trim--but some pilots method of trimming an airplane is to turn on the autopilot. As far out of whack that the MCAS seems to put the trim, the autopilot would not be able to turn on--or not have authority to keep the airplane in level flight.

TTFA -- if you're a pilot and don't know that acronym, you're part of the problem.
Bwipilot is offline  
Old 03-14-2019, 01:42 PM
  #55  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Oct 2011
Posts: 24
Default

I had to look it up.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
1621212_TTFA.jpg (14.0 KB, 503 views)
desmo33 is offline  
Old 03-14-2019, 02:17 PM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Position: 777 Left
Posts: 347
Default

Originally Posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post
They're not nearly as dusty in the MAXes, for some reason.
You sir are evil.... funny, but evil
FastDEW is offline  
Old 03-14-2019, 02:27 PM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Position: 777 Left
Posts: 347
Default

Originally Posted by barabek View Post
I think that a lot of the Monday morning quarterbacks here should wait for the final results of both investigations before judging the pilots' skills. How easy to criticize those who can't defend themselves. Try also imagining the situation at low altitude when your airplane is aggressively trimming forward, your attitude indicator is showing excessive pitch up, stick shaker is going on, you continuously keep overriding the nose down pitch with your stab trim. As I understand from the little information we got about the MCAS, you can override the auto trim forward with your stab trim switch, but the moment you let go off the switch it immediately trims back down. So you have the trim spinning back and forth (thus the oscillations in both accidents) at low altitude and low airspeed. No memory items to turn of the stab trim cutout switches. Not too much time to run QRH, not enough training and information about the system. Some say the other crew that brought the Lion Air airplane the day prior successfully ran the checklist and turned the stab trims switches off. It's true, but they were much higher, during a descent with completely different aircraft energy and attitude. Think what you want, but I consider blaming the crews for being not experienced or not well trained as scapegoating. I think Boeing created the problem and they should assume the responsibility. And for all you great aviators that have so much experience, think about what they went through right after you take off. Add night conditions or IMC if you like...
Agree with this very much ^^^^^
FastDEW is offline  
Old 03-14-2019, 02:48 PM
  #58  
On Guard!
 
Meow1215's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2019
Posts: 1,181
Default

Originally Posted by desmo33 View Post
I had to look it up.
Also looked it up - Thenoyltrifluoroacetone

Still no idea what that is.
Meow1215 is offline  
Old 03-14-2019, 03:19 PM
  #59  
Gets Weekends Off
 
fireman0174's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: Retired 121 pilot
Posts: 1,032
Default

Originally Posted by Adlerdriver View Post
On another note - Runaway stabilizer as a result of MCAS issues or runaway that’s always been a potential failure on every 737 ever produced is still basically...... runaway stabilizer.
Question: when MCAS is operating, does the "stab wheel" also turn?

I assume it does.
fireman0174 is offline  
Old 03-14-2019, 03:29 PM
  #60  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Adlerdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 767 Captain
Posts: 3,988
Default

Originally Posted by fireman0174 View Post
Question: when MCAS is operating, does the "stab wheel" also turn?

I assume it does.
Seems logical. It's trimming and the wheel turns any other time it's happening. But, I don't know for certain.
Adlerdriver is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
STXDrew
United
48
09-10-2018 06:18 PM
Shortbase
Southwest
5
08-08-2018 05:31 AM
Martin404
United
476
04-07-2018 03:24 PM
flyingtigermco
Safety
8
02-13-2011 08:23 AM
Freight Dog
Major
61
02-26-2007 07:06 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices